Is Far Cortical Locking More Effective Than Bicortical Locking in Treating AO 43A1-3 Fractures?

September 5, 2023 updated by: İsmail Demirkale, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

A Comparison of the Effects of Bicortical Locking and Far Cortical Locking Techniques on Clinical, Functional and Radiological Results During Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis of Tibial Distal Metaphyseal Fracture

Delayed union or nonunion, which is a common complication of periarticular fractures repaired with angled locking plate systems, may be due to the unintentionally rigid formation of this system. This study aimed to compare the results of the treatment of distal tibial fractures made more flexible using the far cortical locking (FCL) technique with the classical bicortical locking screw (BL) technique.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Extra-articular distal tibia fractures are uncommon; it constitutes less than 10% of all lower extremity fractures, but even if the fracture is closed, contusion and fracture blisters may accompany these fractures, which can be very effective in deciding the type of treatment because the soft tissue envelope surrounding the tibia is very thin. Discussions on the method of fixation of these fractures continue and seem to never end. Since comparative studies with two popular methods, intra-medullary nailing (IMN) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO), eventually yielded similar results, the choice based on experience and patient-specific characteristics, described as surgeon comfort, has been more accepted.

Malunion after IMN is a common problem and may be caused by the gradual enlargement of the canal after the isthmus or the incomplete centering of the proximal insertion site of the nail. On the contrary, the most common complications reported after MIPO are delayed union, nonunion and infection. In the MIPO technique, angle-stable locked plates are used, which can prevent shear displacement and provide more than 0.2 mm of axial interfragmentary movement, allowing the formation of natural callus tissue. Different methods can be applied to make the partially rigid mechanical environment created by these plates more flexible. These can be diaphyseal fixation with conventional non-locking screws or far cortical locking (FCL), lengthening the bridging plate, or dynamizing the plate with active plates. The FCL method, which changes the axial load with the more parallel interfragmentary method and provides progressive symmetrical mineralization of the callus tissue, is based on the principle that a system that works like an external fixator but works as an internal fixator.

It is thought that this method, which can be defined biomechanically in this way, can prevent the formation of insufficient callus, which may occur especially between plate and bone, in the treatment of periarticular fractures. However, studies on this subject are insufficient in number. Therefore, we aimed to compare the radiological and clinical results of two different diaphyseal fixation models that we performed in the treatment of extra-articular distal tibial metaphyseal fractures with the MIPO method. Our hypothesis is that fixation with the FCL method will provide faster complete union compared to the classical locking plate technique, where the diaphyseal fixation is fixed at all three points with locking screws.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Keçiören SUAM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Skeletally mature patients with closed extra articular AO 43A1-3 distal tibial fractures

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • closed extra articular AO 43A1-3 distal tibial fractures
  • Skeletally mature patients
  • giving informed consent
  • competent neurological and vascular status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • open fractures
  • intraarticular extension,
  • pathological fractures
  • with poor medical health
  • patients with deep abrasion or extensive skin contusion and crush injury preventing one-satge MIPPO

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
FCL group
Plate fixation performed with the use of far cortical locking (2 point screw fixation into the plate and far cortex of the diaphysis)
Apart from the traditional 3 point fixation of the locking screw this technique compromises two point fixation of the screw where one into the plate and the other is into the far cortex of the diaphysis. The near cortex was widened by 3.2 mm of dirll bit to eliminate the fixation of the screw into the near cortex
BL group
Traditional 3 point fixation of the screw into two cortices of the diaphysis and into the plate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RUST score
Time Frame: between 1.5, 6, 9th month and 12th month control
Radiological Union Score of Tibia with a maximum of 12 points which means full union of all cortices
between 1.5, 6, 9th month and 12th month control

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AOFAS scores
Time Frame: between 1.5, 6, 9th month and 12th month control
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points
between 1.5, 6, 9th month and 12th month control
Johner and Wruhs' Criteria
Time Frame: at 12th month control
final functional evaluation of the ankle that includes the conditions of union and infection, as well as deformity and mobility, categorizes patients as excellent, good, fair, and poor.
at 12th month control

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-KAEK-15/2103

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nonunion of Fracture of Tibia

Clinical Trials on Far Cortical Locking Technique

Subscribe