Home Care Medication Management Program for the Frail Elderly

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a home care medication management program which includes nurse coordination and use of the MD.2 medication-dispensing machine will affect older adults' health outcomes, satisfaction, use of health care services, and health care costs over a one year period. The investigators propose a longitudinal three group repeated measures design, enrolling, and randomly assigning, clients who are discharged from a home health care agency with documented problems in medication management. One group will receive the MD.2 medication dispensing device and nurse coordination, the second group will receive a Medplanner: a simple box that has separate compartments for individual medication times over the course of a week plus nurse coordination, and the final group will receive Usual Care.

The study hypotheses are the following:

H1: With respect to health status outcomes, the MD.2 group will exhibit a more positive trajectory in physical and mental health status, functional status, cognitive status and depressive symptoms over the course of a year than will the Medplanner Group.

H2: With respect to health status outcomes, the Medplanner Group will exhibit a more positive trajectory in physical and mental health status, functional status, cognitive status and depressive symptoms over the course of a year than will the Usual Care Group.

H3: The rate of hospitalization, hospital days and emergency department visits will be significantly lower for the MD.2 Group as compared to the Medplanner Group.

H4: The rate of hospitalization, hospital days and emergency department visits will be significantly lower for the Medplanner Group as compared to the Usual Care Group.

H5: The nursing home admission rate will be significantly lower for the MD.2 Group as compared to the Medplanner Group.

H6: The nursing home admission rate will be significantly lower for the Medplanner Group as compared to the Usual Care Group.

H7: The total cost of care will be significantly lower for the MD.2 Group as compared to the Medplanner Group.

H8: The total cost of care will be significantly lower for the Medplanner Group as compared to The Usual Care Group.

H9: There will be incremental savings in terms of costs per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained in the MD.2 group compared with the Medplanner Group.

H10: There will be incremental savings in terms of costs per QALY gained in the Medplanner group compared with the Usual Care Group.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cognitive Impairment; Chronic Illness
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: MD2 machine and nurse care coordination; Other: Medplanner and Nurse Care Coordination

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 414
• Phase: Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Wisconsin
    • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States, 53201
      • University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 60 and older
• Medicare Primary Payer
• Impaired Medication Management ability as indicated by a score of 1 or higher on OASIS discharge assessment item M0780
• Impaired Cognitive Functioning but able to follow directions with prompting as indicated by a score of 1 or 2 on OASIS discharge assessment item M0560
• working telephone line
• Discharge from home health care

Exclusion Criteria:

• Not English speaking
• Terminal diagnosis or hospice care
• Use of other device for medications
• Medicare via managed care
• Use of private home care agency for medication management

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Machine and NCC; Medications dispensed to subject via MD2 machine and nurse care coordination used to coordinate care among providers and fill machine at least every 2 weeks.	Other: MD2 machine and nurse care coordination; MD2 machine filled at least every 2 weeks and subjects monitored for changes in condition. Additional visits made as needed. Care is coordinated with other providers such as the primary care physician and pharmacist.
Experimental: Medplanner and NCC; Medications loaded in medplanner by nurse care coordinator who coordinates care among providers and visits subject at least every 2 weeks	Other: Medplanner and Nurse Care Coordination; Medications are dispensed via a medplanner filled by a nurse at least every 2 weeks and subjects monitored for changes in condition. Additional visits made as needed. Care is coordinated with other providers such as the primary care physician and pharmacist.
No Intervention: Usual Care Group; Admitted post home health care with no intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Geriatric Depression Scale	The Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) was developed to identify depression in older adults. The original GDS was 30 questions, however, fifteen- and five-question versions also exist. When tested on the oldest old in the community, the 15-item scale was demonstrated to have favorable reliability and validity results. Impaired cognitive function (MMSE < 28) reduced the tool's specificity, but sensitivity was not affected by lower MMSE scores. The tool is scored into depression categories of "none/mild", "moderate" and "major".	12 months
Physical Performance Test (PPT)	This functional status test has demonstrated reliability and validity, is easy to administer, can be performed in a reasonable period of time, and imposes little burden on the individual being tested. Even men and women with mild to moderate dementia are capable of understanding the test and performing activities reliably. There are 7 items on the test that range in difficulty from very easy to perform (writing a sentence) to challenging (picking up a penny), thus encompassing a spectrum of physical capabilities.	12 months
SF-36 Health Survey	This tool is a widely used generic health status questionnaire measuring eight dimensions of health status: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, general mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perceptions. In addition, the SF-36 can be transformed into a Health State Utility Index that allows for health improvements to be stated in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.	12 months
Mental Mental Status Exam (MMSE)	This 11-item measure screens for cognitive abilities in the domains of orientation, memory, attention, recall, language and visual/spatial orientation. The MMSE may be a categorical or continuous-level variable. When used as a categorical variable, the MMSE is broken down into 4 levels: (a) score range 24-30 is considered within normal limits (WNL), (b) score range of 18-23 is considered mild cognitive impairment, (c) score range of 12-17 is considered moderate cognitive impairment, and (d) a score range of 11 or less is considered to be severe cognitive impairment.	12 months
Hospitalization	Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.	12 month enrollment period
Hospital Days	Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.	12 Month Enrollment Period
Emergency Department Visits	Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.	12 month Enrollment Period
Medicare Costs	Medicare claims data will be the source of information for this measure.	12 Month Enrollment Period

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Arizona State University
• Collaborators: National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR); University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Karen S Marek, PhD, Arizona State University

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Marek KD, Stetzer F, Ryan PA, Bub LD, Adams SJ, Schlidt A, Lancaster R, O'Brien AM. Nurse care coordination and technology effects on health status of frail older adults via enhanced self-management of medication: randomized clinical trial to test efficacy. Nurs Res. 2013 Jul-Aug;62(4):269-78. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e318298aa55.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: May 1, 2006
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2010
• Study Completion (Actual): May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 15, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 22, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): March 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): January 6, 2012
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 4, 2012
• Last Verified: January 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Medication adherence; Cognitive impairment; Older adults; Medication Management; Home health care; Care Coordination management
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Mental Disorders; Pathologic Processes; Neurocognitive Disorders; Disease Attributes; Cognition Disorders; Cognitive Dysfunction; Chronic Disease
• Other Study ID Numbers: 144PG09; 5R01NR008911 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)