Behavioral Support Before Anesthesia (STØB)

May 5, 2014 updated by: Marianne K. Thygesen, Odense University Hospital

Behavioral Support to Cancer Patients Before Anesthesia

Studies shows that reduced nervousness before anaesthesia may improve a course past anaesthesia. Therefore it is interesting to investigate how we can best help patients shortly before anaesthesia. A RCT with three intervention arms (with different personal support) and a control arm (with usual personal support) is therefore performed.

Hypothesis: Nervousness is reduced by the new interventions compared to the usual help provided.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All patients receive behavioral support the last half hour before anaesthesia, but at different times and provided by persons with different connection to the patients.

The last two patients in all arms will be interviewed about their experiences with the help offered.

Statistic will provide results in the quantitative part of the study and analysis and interpretation following ideas of the French philosopher Poul Ricoeur will provide results in the qualitative part of the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

350

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fyn
      • Odense, Fyn, Denmark, 5000
        • Gynækologisk obstetrisk afdeling D, Odense Universitetshospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All Danish-speaking expected gynaecological cancer patients, who are offered open surgery at Odense University Hospital, who can speak for themselves and have the opportunity to have close relative to follow before anaesthesia and who accept participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Senility

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: An anaesthetic nurse
Additional staff are only present if required by law.
Other Names:
  • Nursing care from an anaesthetic nurse
Active Comparator: Theatre nurse + An anaesthetic nurse
Support from theatre nurse and an anaesthetic nurse
Theatre nurse stay with the patient, follow her to the operating table and stays with her until she is anaesthetized
Other Names:
  • Care from a theatre nurse
Experimental: A nurse from ward + an anaesthesic nurse
Support from a nurse from the ward and an anaesthetic nurse
A nurse from the ward follows the patient to the operating table and stays with her until she is anaesthetized.
Other Names:
  • Nursing care from a ward nurse
Experimental: Optional relative + an anaesthetic nurse
Support from an optional relative and an anaesthetic nurse
Optional relative follows the patient to the operating table and stays with her until she is anaesthetized
Other Names:
  • Care from an optional relative

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in nervousness at the operating table
Time Frame: Baseline and when the patient is on the operating table, on average 1½ days
VAS score shown by patients and written down by the anesthetic nurse correcte to one decimal place.
Baseline and when the patient is on the operating table, on average 1½ days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction with help from healthcare professionals
Time Frame: A questionnaire at discharge, an expected average of three days
A validated questionnaire is filed out by patients. The questionnaire have six items measuring satisfaction with help from healthcare professionals provided at the hospital.
A questionnaire at discharge, an expected average of three days
Healthcare professional time spent
Time Frame: The last half an hour before anaesthesia
Healthcare professional time spent on interventions: Healthcare professional time used with patient and relative half an hour before anaesthesia byond what is required by law
The last half an hour before anaesthesia

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ole Mogensen, Professor, Southern University of Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AA

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nervousness

Subscribe