Implementation of an Integrated Primary Care Network for Prevention and Management of Cardiometabolic Risks (RCM)

Implementation of an Integrated Primary Care Network for Prevention and Management of Cardiometabolic Risks (RCM)

CONTEXTE: L'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal (ASSS) invited our research team to evaluate the implementation of an integrated and interdisciplinary primary care network for prevention and management of cardiometabolic risks (diabetes and hypertension) (PCR). The intervention is based on the Chronic Care Model and the development of an integrated services network. PCR is to be implemented in 6 territories of "Centre de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS)". A first application for funding was made to Fonds Pfizer-FRSQ-MSSS for an evaluation that has to be completed in the first 24 month after the beginning of the implementation. This application to the PHSI program at CIHR is complementary and will ensure an evaluation of the sustainability of PCR and of long term effects (40 months after the beginning of the implementation) for patients and for their primary care physicians.

In each CSSS, PCR plans for : 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors of "Réseau local de services (RLS)" insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.

OBJECTIVES: 1-evaluate PCR effects according to territory, time and degree of exposure (specifically benefits to registered patients and support to participating primary care physicians); 2- identify the degree of implementation of PCR in each CSSS territory and the related contextual factors; 3- examine the relationship between the effects identified, the degree of implementation of PCR and the related contextual factors; 4- assess the impact of implementing PCR on the strengthening of RLS.

METHODS: The proposed evaluation will be done through a mixed design including two complementary strategies. Using a "quasi-experiment/before-after" design, the first strategy is a quantitative approach looking at the program effects and their variation between territories. This analysis will use data from the PCR clinical database (ex.: HbA1c, BP, lifestyle) and from patient questionnaire inquiring about care experience, utilization of services, chronic care follow-up, self-management and quality of life. Around 3000 patients will be enlisted. A primary care physician questionnaire will enquire about PCR effects on their practice. Using primarily a qualitative and a case study approach, each of the 6 territories being one case, the second strategy will identify the degree of implementation of PCR and the explanatory contextual factors. This analysis with use data obtained from semi-structured interviews with program managers. The results of this analysis will be summarized in a monograph for each territory. According to the type of indicator analyzed, objective 3 will be fulfilled using linear models or longitudinal multilevel models supplemented with an interpretive approach using the information from monographs and discussion groups. The impact of implementing PCR on RLS will be assessed through interviews with key informants.

RESULTS AND EXPECTED IMPACT: Our study will identify the effectiveness of PCR and contextual factors associated with successful implementation and sustainability of PCR. Detailed contextual information will allow application of our results to other environments that have similar context and to other chronic conditions that could benefit from an integrated services network.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: Since decision makers, clinicians and researchers did and will take part in all phases of PRC evaluation (planning, data collection, analysis and interpretation), diffusion of information regarding the program is an integral part of the research process. In addition, results will be presented at local, regional, provincial and national conferences and published in reports and articles widely distributed. More specifically, a regional symposium will be organized to share evaluation results with all CSSS in the region (n=12) and with all our local and regional partners.

Study Overview

• Status: Unknown
• Conditions: Hypertension; Diabetes
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 3000
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Canada
  • Quebec
    • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 1M3
      • Public Health Department

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diabetic adults with borderline fasting blood sugar or glucose intolerance or treated with diet only or treated with only one medication or treated with multiple medications but with Hb A1c ≤ 8%;
• Adults with blood pressure in office ≥ 140/90 mm Hg (if diabetes present, BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg)

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Prevention
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

6

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 1; Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 1 and level of implementation	Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6; 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 2; Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 2 and level of implementation	Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6; 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 3; Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 3 and level of implementation	Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6; 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 4; Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 4 and level of implementation	Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6; 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 5; Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 5 and level of implementation	Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6; 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
Active Comparator: Chronic care management 6; Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 6 and level of implementation	Behavioral: Chronic care management 1-6; 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Diabetes and Hypertension control	Biomedical indicators of diabetes (Hb A1c ≤7%) and hypertension (blood pressure ≤ 140/90) control	24 months after registration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Effects on patient's behavior	Life-style improvement (physical activity, nutrition, smoking)	24 months after registration
Effects on patient's autonomy	Self-care	24 months after registration
Effects on patient's health	Quality of live	24 months after registration
Effects on follow-up of chronic diseases	Chronic care management	24 months after registration
Effects on process of care	Indexes of continuity, accessibility, comprehensiveness and perceived quality of care	24 months after registration
Effects on physician practice	Physician perception regarding effects of program on patients, inter-professional collaboration, development of knowledge, management of diabetes and hypertension	24 months after registration

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Public Health Department, Montreal
• Collaborators: Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec; Ministere de la Sante et des Services Sociaux; Health and Social Services Agency, Montreal
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Pierre Tousignant, MD, Public Health Department, Montreal

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Provost S, Pineault R, Tousignant P, Hamel M, Da Silva RB. Evaluation of the implementation of an integrated primary care network for prevention and management of cardiometabolic risk in Montreal. BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Nov 10;12:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-126.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): June 1, 2014
• Study Completion (Anticipated): June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 28, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 29, 2011
• First Posted (Estimate): March 30, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimate): March 30, 2011
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 29, 2011
• Last Verified: March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Health services research; Chronic care model; Integrated care network
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Cardiovascular Diseases; Vascular Diseases; Hypertension
• Other Study ID Numbers: RisqueCardioMetabolique; FRSQ 22425 (Other Identifier: Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec)