이 페이지는 자동 번역되었으며 번역의 정확성을 보장하지 않습니다. 참조하십시오 영문판 원본 텍스트의 경우.

Implementation of an Integrated Primary Care Network for Prevention and Management of Cardiometabolic Risks (RCM)

2011년 3월 29일 업데이트: Public Health Department, Montreal

Implementation of an Integrated Primary Care Network for Prevention and Management of Cardiometabolic Risks (RCM)

CONTEXTE: L'Agence de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal (ASSS) invited our research team to evaluate the implementation of an integrated and interdisciplinary primary care network for prevention and management of cardiometabolic risks (diabetes and hypertension) (PCR). The intervention is based on the Chronic Care Model and the development of an integrated services network. PCR is to be implemented in 6 territories of "Centre de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS)". A first application for funding was made to Fonds Pfizer-FRSQ-MSSS for an evaluation that has to be completed in the first 24 month after the beginning of the implementation. This application to the PHSI program at CIHR is complementary and will ensure an evaluation of the sustainability of PCR and of long term effects (40 months after the beginning of the implementation) for patients and for their primary care physicians.

In each CSSS, PCR plans for : 1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors of "Réseau local de services (RLS)" insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.

OBJECTIVES: 1-evaluate PCR effects according to territory, time and degree of exposure (specifically benefits to registered patients and support to participating primary care physicians); 2- identify the degree of implementation of PCR in each CSSS territory and the related contextual factors; 3- examine the relationship between the effects identified, the degree of implementation of PCR and the related contextual factors; 4- assess the impact of implementing PCR on the strengthening of RLS.

METHODS: The proposed evaluation will be done through a mixed design including two complementary strategies. Using a "quasi-experiment/before-after" design, the first strategy is a quantitative approach looking at the program effects and their variation between territories. This analysis will use data from the PCR clinical database (ex.: HbA1c, BP, lifestyle) and from patient questionnaire inquiring about care experience, utilization of services, chronic care follow-up, self-management and quality of life. Around 3000 patients will be enlisted. A primary care physician questionnaire will enquire about PCR effects on their practice. Using primarily a qualitative and a case study approach, each of the 6 territories being one case, the second strategy will identify the degree of implementation of PCR and the explanatory contextual factors. This analysis with use data obtained from semi-structured interviews with program managers. The results of this analysis will be summarized in a monograph for each territory. According to the type of indicator analyzed, objective 3 will be fulfilled using linear models or longitudinal multilevel models supplemented with an interpretive approach using the information from monographs and discussion groups. The impact of implementing PCR on RLS will be assessed through interviews with key informants.

RESULTS AND EXPECTED IMPACT: Our study will identify the effectiveness of PCR and contextual factors associated with successful implementation and sustainability of PCR. Detailed contextual information will allow application of our results to other environments that have similar context and to other chronic conditions that could benefit from an integrated services network.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: Since decision makers, clinicians and researchers did and will take part in all phases of PRC evaluation (planning, data collection, analysis and interpretation), diffusion of information regarding the program is an integral part of the research process. In addition, results will be presented at local, regional, provincial and national conferences and published in reports and articles widely distributed. More specifically, a regional symposium will be organized to share evaluation results with all CSSS in the region (n=12) and with all our local and regional partners.

연구 개요

상태

알려지지 않은

연구 유형

중재적

등록 (예상)

3000

단계

  • 해당 없음

연락처 및 위치

이 섹션에서는 연구를 수행하는 사람들의 연락처 정보와 이 연구가 수행되는 장소에 대한 정보를 제공합니다.

연구 연락처

연구 연락처 백업

연구 장소

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, 캐나다, H2L 1M3
        • Public Health Department
        • 연락하다:
        • 수석 연구원:
          • Pierre Tousignant, MD

참여기준

연구원은 적격성 기준이라는 특정 설명에 맞는 사람을 찾습니다. 이러한 기준의 몇 가지 예는 개인의 일반적인 건강 상태 또는 이전 치료입니다.

자격 기준

공부할 수 있는 나이

18년 이상 (성인, 고령자)

건강한 자원 봉사자를 받아들입니다

아니

연구 대상 성별

모두

설명

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic adults with borderline fasting blood sugar or glucose intolerance or treated with diet only or treated with only one medication or treated with multiple medications but with Hb A1c ≤ 8%;
  • Adults with blood pressure in office ≥ 140/90 mm Hg (if diabetes present, BP ≥ 130/80 mm Hg)

공부 계획

이 섹션에서는 연구 설계 방법과 연구가 측정하는 내용을 포함하여 연구 계획에 대한 세부 정보를 제공합니다.

연구는 어떻게 설계됩니까?

디자인 세부사항

  • 주 목적: 방지
  • 할당: 무작위화되지 않음
  • 중재 모델: 병렬 할당
  • 마스킹: 없음(오픈 라벨)

무기와 개입

참가자 그룹 / 팔
개입 / 치료
활성 비교기: Chronic care management 1
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 1 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
활성 비교기: Chronic care management 2
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 2 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
활성 비교기: Chronic care management 3
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 3 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
활성 비교기: Chronic care management 4
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 4 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
활성 비교기: Chronic care management 5
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 5 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.
활성 비교기: Chronic care management 6
Content of chronic care model implemented in territory 6 and level of implementation
1- an interdisciplinary team in an education center working with primary care physicians and offering to referred patients a pre-determined sequence of clinical interventions over a 2-year-period; 2- a program supporting primary care physicians (continuing education, documentation and clinical guidelines, referral system to second line of care); 3- networking between actors insuring clinical information transfer required for efficient patient management.

연구는 무엇을 측정합니까?

주요 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Diabetes and Hypertension control
기간: 24 months after registration
Biomedical indicators of diabetes (Hb A1c ≤7%) and hypertension (blood pressure ≤ 140/90) control
24 months after registration

2차 결과 측정

결과 측정
측정값 설명
기간
Effects on patient's behavior
기간: 24 months after registration
Life-style improvement (physical activity, nutrition, smoking)
24 months after registration
Effects on patient's autonomy
기간: 24 months after registration
Self-care
24 months after registration
Effects on patient's health
기간: 24 months after registration
Quality of live
24 months after registration
Effects on follow-up of chronic diseases
기간: 24 months after registration
Chronic care management
24 months after registration
Effects on process of care
기간: 24 months after registration
Indexes of continuity, accessibility, comprehensiveness and perceived quality of care
24 months after registration
Effects on physician practice
기간: 24 months after registration
Physician perception regarding effects of program on patients, inter-professional collaboration, development of knowledge, management of diabetes and hypertension
24 months after registration

공동 작업자 및 조사자

여기에서 이 연구와 관련된 사람과 조직을 찾을 수 있습니다.

수사관

  • 수석 연구원: Pierre Tousignant, MD, Public Health Department, Montreal

간행물 및 유용한 링크

연구에 대한 정보 입력을 담당하는 사람이 자발적으로 이러한 간행물을 제공합니다. 이것은 연구와 관련된 모든 것에 관한 것일 수 있습니다.

연구 기록 날짜

이 날짜는 ClinicalTrials.gov에 대한 연구 기록 및 요약 결과 제출의 진행 상황을 추적합니다. 연구 기록 및 보고된 결과는 공개 웹사이트에 게시되기 전에 특정 품질 관리 기준을 충족하는지 확인하기 위해 국립 의학 도서관(NLM)에서 검토합니다.

연구 주요 날짜

연구 시작

2011년 4월 1일

기본 완료 (예상)

2014년 6월 1일

연구 완료 (예상)

2014년 6월 1일

연구 등록 날짜

최초 제출

2011년 3월 28일

QC 기준을 충족하는 최초 제출

2011년 3월 29일

처음 게시됨 (추정)

2011년 3월 30일

연구 기록 업데이트

마지막 업데이트 게시됨 (추정)

2011년 3월 30일

QC 기준을 충족하는 마지막 업데이트 제출

2011년 3월 29일

마지막으로 확인됨

2011년 3월 1일

추가 정보

이 연구와 관련된 용어

추가 관련 MeSH 약관

기타 연구 ID 번호

  • RisqueCardioMetabolique
  • FRSQ 22425 (기타 식별자: Fonds de la recherche en santé du Québec)

이 정보는 변경 없이 clinicaltrials.gov 웹사이트에서 직접 가져온 것입니다. 귀하의 연구 세부 정보를 변경, 제거 또는 업데이트하도록 요청하는 경우 register@clinicaltrials.gov. 문의하십시오. 변경 사항이 clinicaltrials.gov에 구현되는 즉시 저희 웹사이트에도 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. .

Chronic care management 1-6에 대한 임상 시험

3
구독하다