The Healthy Start Project: Primary Prevention of Overweight in Preschool Children Susceptible to Future Overweight

May 13, 2020 updated by: Berit Lilienthal Heitmann, Bispebjerg Hospital

Prevention of Weight Gain Among Normal Weight, Obesity Susceptible, Pre-school Children - a Randomized Controlled Interventions Study.

Obesity prevention should remain a priority, although there is some evidence of a possible leveling off in some age groups across European countries and in USA, Japan and Australia. Besides adult health problems such as type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases, obesity in childhood is associated with psychological and social problems, low self-esteem, stigmatization and being teased and bullied by friends. Danish research suggests that the causes behind the increase in obesity occurrence are present already in early childhood, and that prevention of obesity therefore has to start early. Research has suggested that at least three sub-groups can be considered susceptible to develop obesity: Children with obesity among their 1st degree relatives; children with a high birth weight or children coming from socially disadvantaged families (low socioeconomic status). Earlier intervention programs has showed little effect in preventing excessive weight gain and knowledge on how to develop effective intervention programs that reduce overweight and obesity remains limited. It has been suggested that future prevention programs may be more successful if specifically targeting groups that are at high risk, as mention above, of excessive weight gain.

Based on these suggestions, the "Sund Start" project was initiated. The purpose of the study was to determine whether aiming prevention towards 2-6 years old Danish children who were yet normal weight, but were considered susceptible to develop overweight or obese could prevent later on risk of becoming overweight or obese. Furthermore, to investigate if it was possible to improve diet habits, increase physical activity, reduce stress and improve sleeping habits among children at high risk for later on overweight and obesity.

The "Sund Start" project will contribute with knowledge about whether targeting normal weight, predisposed children is effective in preventing overweight and obesity, and if reduced stress and improved sleep, should be considered important new obesity prevention tools. Moreover, the project will contribute with knowledge about how to change lifestyle and its effects on development of overweight and obesity in high risk Danish preschool children.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

In 2009, data on all births between 2004 and 2007 in 11 selected municipalities from the greater Copenhagen area was obtained from the Danish national birth register at the National Board of Health. This register contains information on all births, whether at hospital or home, on factors such as birth weight and length, height and pre-pregnant weight of the mother, parity, and Central Personal Registry number (CPR-number). Data on socioeconomic status was obtained from the administrative birth forms. This was done manually using the CPR-numbers obtained from the birth register.

After selection of the children eligible for participation, the children were allocated to three groups, (intervention group, control group, shadow group) using computer based randomization. All siblings were allocated to the same group. After the random allocation, children from the intervention group and the control group were sent a letter with an invitation to participate in the project. Children from the shadow group were also identified, and their general practitioners were contacted and asked for information on each child's height and weight.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1202

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Frederiksberg, Denmark, 2000
        • Parker Institute, Research Unit for Dietary Studies

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Born between 2004-2007
  • Born in 11 selected municipalities in the greater Copenhagen area
  • Classified as susceptible to overweight and obesity (At least one of the following risk factors present: A high birth weight (> 4000 grams), maternal pre-pregnancy obesity (BMI > 28 kg/m^2), or maternal low education (<= 10 years)
  • Normal weight at baseline examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moved to another municipality after birth,
  • Had requested protection from participation in statistical or scientific surveys based on data delivered from the Danish Central Person Registry
  • No permanent address
  • Lived in a children's home
  • Had died
  • Had emigrated
  • Registered in the Danish Central Person Registry as being disappeared or had unknown life status
  • Not speaking Danish
  • Overweight (including obesity) at baseline examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Improved lifestyle
The intervention group was offered up to 10 individual consultations focusing on improving diet, physical activity and sleep habits and reducing stress. Moreover, the intervention group was offered participation in monthly cooking classes and playing arrangements
No Intervention: Control group
The control group was seen at baseline and follow-up, but not in between.
No Intervention: Shadow group
The shadow group was followed in registers exclusively

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anthropometric measurements
Time Frame: 1.3 years

Changes between baseline and 1.3 years follow.up per intervention year in:

Height in cm Weight in kg BMI in kg/m^2 BMI z-score in SD Waist circumference in cm Hip circumference in cm Sum of four skinfolds (biceps, triceps, subscapular and suprailiac) in cm Body composition measured by bio-electrical impedance

1.3 years
Anthropometric measurements
Time Frame: 5 years

Changes between baseline and 5 years follow.up per intervention year in:

Height in cm Weight in kg BMI in kg/m^2 BMI z-score in SD

5 years
Anthropometric measurements
Time Frame: 10 years

Changes between baseline and 10 years follow.up per intervention year in:

Height in cm Weight in kg BMI in kg/m^2 BMI z-score in SD

10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dietary intake
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Four day dietary record completed Wednesday-Saturday
1.3 years
Priority of serving fruit and vegetables
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How high do you prioritize that fruit and vegetables are served at the meals? (Scale from 1 to 4, 1 being low and 4 being high. Higher values considered better outcome)
1.3 years
Physical activity
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Children's Physical Activity Questionnaire (C-PAQ. 7-day recording of sports, games and leisure time activities outside daycare. The response options were indicated by doing a particular activity ("yes" or "no") and by an indication of total time used on the activity during the week (minutes per week). All minutes per week were summed to obtain an indication of overall physical activity level. Higher values considered better outcome)
1.3 years
Sleep duration
Time Frame: 1.3 years
7 day sleep record from completed questionnaire (average number of minutes sleep summed from 7 day record on sleep- and wake time points)
1.3 years
Child stress level
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Measured concentration of cortisol in hair samples
1.3 years
Parental stress level
Time Frame: 1.3 year
Measured concentration of cortisol in hair samples
1.3 year
Sleep quality
Time Frame: 1.3 year
Child's sleep is considered (calm all night, a little disturbed, disturbed with occasional awakenings, very disturbed with several awakenings. Calm all night considered best outcome).
1.3 year
Child stress level
Time Frame: 1.3 year
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Scored 0-2 and summed to Total Difficulties score (0-40, lower score indicate better outcome), and Prosocial Behavior score (0-10, lower score indicate worst outcome)
1.3 year
Parental stress level
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Modified version of the Swedish Parental Stress Index (PSI). Each question was scored between 0 and 2 (0 considered best score and 2 the worst), according to its estimated indication of an overall stress level. Analysis of intercorrelations among the 10 questions and a principal component analysis suggested that 9 of the 10 questions could be added together to get a score for the overall family stress level (0-18)
1.3 years
Daily physical activity: Enjoys being active
Time Frame: 1.3 years
If the child enjoyed being physically active (Never, often, some times, usually, always. Always considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Meal habits: Eating breakfast together
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How many times per week does the family eat breakfast together (None, 1 day, 2-3 days, 4-5 days, 6-7 days. 6-7 days considered best outcome).
1.3 years
Meal habits: Eating dinner together
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How many times per week does the family eat dinner together (None, 1 day, 2-3 days, 4-5 days, 6-7 days. 6-7 days considered best outcome).
1.3 years
Meal habits: Mealtime situation
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How would you describe the meals with the child (Very conflictive, little conflictive, very cozy, little cozy, don't know. Very cozy considered best outcome).
1.3 years
Meal habits: Pickiness
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How would you describe your child's way of eating (Picky, open to new tastes, eats everything. Eats everything considered best outcome).
1.3 years
Meal habits: Appetite
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How would you describe your child's appetite (Too big appetite, good appetite, normal appetite, too small appetite, don't know. Normal appetite considered best outcome).
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Difficulties falling asleep
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Difficulties falling asleep (yes/no. No considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Difficulties waking up
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Difficulties waking up (yes/no. No considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Sleep onset latency
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Sleep onset latency (numerical. Lower values considered better outcome)
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Bedtime routines
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Routine activities before bedtime (No, < 1/week, 1-2 times/week, 3-4 times/week, 5-6 times/week, every day. Every day considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Joining parents' bed
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Child joining parents' bed (yes/no. If yes, how often (< 1/month, 1-3 times/month,1-3 times/week, 4-6 times/week, every night)
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Falling asleep
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Child afraid to fall asleep (Never, rarely, some times, often, very often. Never considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Sleep quality: Dreams
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Child has frightening/upsetting dreams (Never, rarely, some times, often, very often. Never considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Daily physical activity: Means of transportation
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Means of transportation to and from day-care, and frequency (Walk, strolling, bike on its own, biked by parent, and bus, train or car, number of times per week (1,2,3,4 or 5. Walking or biking on its own considered best outcome).
1.3 years
Daily physical activity: Activity compared to other children
Time Frame: 1.3 years
How active is the child compared to other children at similar age? (as active, somewhat active, very active, don't know. Very active considered best outcome)
1.3 years
Daily physical activity: Activity with parents
Time Frame: 1.3 years
Frequency of which one or both parents were physically active with the child (once per week, 2-4 times per week, 5-7 times per week, multiple times per day. Multiple times per day considered best outcome)
1.3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Berit L Heitmann, Professor, Parker Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

April 24, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 15, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 13, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Lifestyle habits, including sleep and stress

Subscribe