Quality of Life and Depression in Dialysis Patients (QOLD)

August 21, 2015 updated by: Fresenius Medical Care Korea

Quality of Life and Depression in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients and Hemodialysis Patients

The aim of this study is to evaluate quality of life (QOL) and depression in peritoneal dialysis patients compare to hemodialysis patients and assess hydration effect on QOL and depression over time.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In dialysis patients, low QOL and depression affects clinical outcomes such as morbidity and mortality.

Therefore at the point of treating dialysis patients, It is important to provide not only physical health but also psychosocial health.

QOL could be decided by physical health (i.e. sign and symptom, laboratory results, death) and psychological health (i.e. fatigue, pain, consciousness of health and satisfaction).

And also generally it is well known that physical and psychological functions in dialysis patients are decreased.

And especially depression is common disease in dialysis patients. It is also well known that about from 25 to 50 percent of dialysis patients have depression which could result in low QOL moreover hospitalization, complication, and mortality.

But there is no QOL and depression study with hydration status. Therefore the investigators would like to explore it.

The objective of the study is to evaluate quality of life (QOL) and depression in dialysis patients and assess the hydration effect on QOL and depression over time

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1068

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Seocho-gu
      • Seoul, Seocho-gu, Korea, Republic of, 137-701
        • Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. Incident PD patients group : 250 subjects, First treatment for ESRD by any peritoneal dialysis modality within 30 days prior to or following enrollment (patients may be enrolled prior to commencing first treatment if there is clear indication that the treatment modality is CAPD or APD and they consent in advance to enter the study) and patients who don't have any experience of dialysis treatment before this study
  2. Prevalent PD patients : 250 subjects, Prevalent peritoneal dialysis(PD) patients who are under peritoneal dialysis treatment more than 6 months
  3. Prevalent HD patients : 250 subjects, Prevalent hemodialysis(HD) patients who are under hemodialysis treatment more than 6 months

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dialysis patients, age from 18 years to 75 years
  • Incident continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis(CAPD) or automated peritoneal dialysis(APD) patients who don't have any experience of dialysis treatment before this study
  • Prevalent peritoneal dialysis(PD) patients who are getting peritoneal dialysis treatment more than 6 months
  • Prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients who are getting haemodialysis treatment more than 6 months
  • The subjects who are eligible for 1 year follow up
  • Written informed consent before any trial related activities
  • Eligible patients to complete questionnaire

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prognosis for survival less than 3 months
  • Kidney transplantation less than 15 months
  • Ineligible patients for questionnaire
  • Any malignancies and ascites
  • Any condition which could interfere with the patient's ability to comply with the study protocol
  • Ineligible to measure BCM

    1. pacemaker, defibrillator
    2. pregnancy or lactation period
    3. amputation
    4. artificial joint

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Incident PD patients
First treatment for end stage of renal disease (ESRD) by any peritoneal dialysis modality within 30 days prior to or following enrollment (patients may be enrolled prior to commencing first treatment if there is clear indication that the treatment modality is continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) or automated peritoneal dilaysis (APD) and they consent in advance to enter the study) and patients who don't have any experience of dialysis treatment before this study
Prevalent PD patients
Prevalent peritoneal dialysis(PD) patients who are under peritoneal dialysis treatment more than 6 months
Prevalent HD patients
Prevalent hemodialysis(HD) patients who are under hemodialysis treatment more than 6 months

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form 1.3 (KDQOL SF 1.3) Score and Beck Depression Inventory(BDI) Score From Visit 1 Period
Time Frame: Visit 1(zero month) and Visit 2 (12 months after Visit 1)

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is assessed via KDQOL SF 1.3 and depression is assessed via BDI at the visit 1 and Visit 2 period.

KDQOL SF 1.3 and BDI are validated questionnaires to assess HRQOL and depression, respectively.

Visit 2 period is followed 12 months after Visit 1 period. The outcome measure is the difference in averaged scores between Visit 1 and Visit 2; It is calculated as (Score at visit 2 - Score at visit 1).

HRQOL is assessed by three components; physical health score, mental health score and kidney disease health score.

Physical health score, mental health score and kidney disease health score are averaged scores of subscales.

The range of each score and each subscale are 0 - 100, and higher values indicate better HRQOL status.

The BDI score is a summed score of each component of BDI questionnaire, and the range is 5 to 63. Higher BDI scores are considered to represent more severe depression symptoms.

Visit 1(zero month) and Visit 2 (12 months after Visit 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Association Between Hydration Status and Depression and Quality of Life in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients
Time Frame: Visit 1(zero month) and Visit 2 (12 months after Visit 1)

Hydration status is checked via BCM(body composition monitor) at Visit 1 and Visit 2 period, as a Overhydration(OH) value.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is measured via scores of KDQOL SF1.3. Depression was assessed using Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) score. Visit 2 period is followed 12 months after Visit 1 period. HRQOL is assessed by three components; physical health score, mental health score and kidney disease health score.

Physical health score, mental health score and kidney disease health score are averaged scores of subscales.

The range of each score and each subscale are 0 - 100, and higher values indicate better HRQOL status.

The BDI score is a summed score of each component of BDI questionnaire, and the range is 5 to 63. Higher BDI scores are considered to represent more severe depression symptoms.

The outcome measure is the averaged scores at Visit 1 between the Normohydration group and Overhydration group.

Visit 1(zero month) and Visit 2 (12 months after Visit 1)
The Association Between Hydration Status and Depression and Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients
Time Frame: Visit 1(zero month) and Visit 2 (12 months after Visit 1)
Quality of life was measured via scores of KDQOL SF1.3. Hydration status was measured via body composition monitor as an Overhydration (OH) value Depression was assessed using Beck depression inventory (BDI) score
Visit 1(zero month) and Visit 2 (12 months after Visit 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yongsoo Kim, M.D., Ph.D., Division of nephrology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 21, 2015

Last Verified

August 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5

Subscribe