- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01683604
Observational Study of Tocilizumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Australia
June 10, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Multi-National, Multi-Center Non-Interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab (ACT-UP)
This multi-center, observational study will evaluate the treatment patterns in clinical practice, efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response (or were intolerant to) treatment with non-biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with one biological agent.
Data will be collected from each eligible participant initiated on tocilizumab treatment by their treating physician according to approved label for 6 months from start of treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
37
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New South Wales
-
Campsie, New South Wales, Australia, 2194
-
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, Australia, 2450
-
New Lambton, New South Wales, Australia, 2305
-
-
South Australia
-
Woodville, South Australia, Australia, 5011
-
-
Victoria
-
Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia, 3084
-
Morwell, Victoria, Australia, 3842
-
-
Western Australia
-
Shenton Park, Western Australia, Australia, 6008
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
RA participants treated with tocilizumab
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Severe RA.
- Inadequate response (or intolerant) to non-biological DMARDs or one biologic agent
- Participants initiating treatment with tocilizumab on their physician's decision (in accordance with the local label), including participants who started treatment with tocilizumab within the 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tocilizumab treatment more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit.
- Previous tocilizumab treatment in a clinical trial or for compassionate use.
- Enrolled in an ongoing clinical trial and/or treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with tocilizumab.
- History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than RA.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Participants (All Groups)
Participants with severe RA were prescribed with tocilizumab in accordance with routine clinic practice, and were observed for 6 months.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Percentage of participants on tocilizumab treatment at Month 6 was calculated as: [(participants on tocilizumab treatment at Month 6) divided by (participants evaluable for primary objective)] multiplied by 100.
|
Month 6
|
|
Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participants measured the pain intensity due to RA on a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no pain to 100 = unbearable pain.
|
Baseline
|
|
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = managing very well to 100 = managing very poorly.
|
Baseline
|
|
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Physician global assessment of disease activity was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity to 100 = extremely active arthritis.
|
Baseline
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire that measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life.
It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks.
The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities.
These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities over past week.
Each question is evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale.
Total score for HAQ-DI is the average of all questions and ranges from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do.
|
Baseline
|
|
Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion.
Tenderness was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.
SJC was determined by examining 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present.
Swelling was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
|
Baseline
|
|
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation.
The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube.
Normal range is 0-30 millimeters per hour (mm/hr).
A decrease in the level indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
|
Baseline
|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay.
A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDs
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Baseline
|
|
|
Median Dose at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
|
Month 6
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for Change
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
|
Percentage of participants with increase or decrease in tocilizumab administration according to the reason for dose modification was reported.
|
Baseline up to Month 6
|
|
Mean Dosing Interval at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
|
The time interval between two successive doses in days was reported.
|
Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued Tocilizumab
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
|
Baseline up to Month 6
|
|
|
Time to Restoration of Initial Dosing Regimen
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
|
Baseline up to Month 6
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Reason for Choice of Monotherapy at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
|
Baseline up to Month 6
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
|
Baseline, Month 6
|
|
|
Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
|
Baseline up to Month 6
|
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning Stiffness
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was able to resume normal activities without stiffness.
The participant assessment of morning stiffness was measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS by 1 of the six categories: less than (<) 30 minutes, between 30 and 240 minutes, greater than (>) 240 minutes and whole day.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning Stiffness
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. The participant assessed morning stiffness based on the following criteria:
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
|
Percentage of participants who adhered to local label/protocol for the management of adverse events is reported.
|
Baseline up to Month 6
|
|
Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The DAS28 score is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores representing higher disease activity, and calculated as DAS28 = 0.56 x √TJC28 + 0.28 x √SJC28 + 0.70 x natural logarithm (ln) (CRP + 1) + 0.014 x PGH + 0.96, where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein (after converting units to mg/dL), PGH = patient global assessment of disease activity, which was measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly.
A score of less than 2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of greater than or equal to 2.6 and less than or equal to 3.2 represents low disease activity, a score of greater than 3.2 and less than or equal to 5.1 represents moderate disease activity, and a score of greater than 5.1 represents high (or severe) disease.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6
Time Frame: Month 3 and Month 6
|
Clinical response was assessed according to EULAR criteria that classified the participant according to individual changes in DAS28 score as good, moderate, or no response.
The DAS28 score is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores represent higher disease activity, and calculated as DAS28 = 0.56 x √TJC28 + 0.28 x √SJC28 + 0.36 x ln(CRP + 1) + 0.014 x PGH + 0.96, where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein (after converting units to mg/dL), PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, which was measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly.
Good responders experienced a change from baseline of greater than 1.2 with a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2.
|
Month 3 and Month 6
|
|
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The CDAI is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA and calculated as CDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + PGH (in centimeters) + PhGH (in centimeters), where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly, and PhGH = physician global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis; with a total score ranged from 0-76.
Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.
CDAI score of less than or equal to 2.8 represents clinical remission, score of less than or equal to 10.0 represents low disease activity, score of less than or equal to 22.0 represents moderate disease activity, and score of greater than 22.0 represents high (or severe) disease.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion.
The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1.
SJC was determined by examination of 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present.
The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The SDAI is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA and calculated as SDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + PGH (in centimeters) + PhGH (in centimeters) + CRP (in mg/dL), where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly, PhGH = physician global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein; with a total SDAI score ranged from 0-86.
Higher scores indicate greater disease activity.
SDAI scores of less than or equal to 3.3 represents clinical remission, less than or equal to 11.0 represents low disease activity, less than or equal to 26.0 represents moderate disease activity, and greater than 26.0 represents high (or severe) disease.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab Treatment
Time Frame: Month 3 and Month 6
|
ACR 20,50 or 70 response=an improvement of ≥ 20%, ≥ 50% or ≥ 70% respectively, as compared to baseline in TJC28 and SJC28, and 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following measures: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours, PGA, PhGA, HAQ, and acute phase reactant (either CRP or ESR).
TJC and SJC, based on 28-joint assessments.
Number of tender joints and swollen joints were recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0 and tenderness = 1, no swelling = 0 and swelling =1, respectively.
HAQ measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life with 20 questions, summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities over past week, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do.
Patient's assessment of pain assessed using a VAS; 0=no pain, 100=unbearable pain; PGA and PhGA, assessed using VAS ; 0= no disease activity, 100=maximum disease activity.
|
Month 3 and Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The physician global assessment of disease activity was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis.
Higher scores indicated increased level of disease.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The patient's global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0= managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire that measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life.
It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks.
The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities.
These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities over past week.
Each question was evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do.
Total score is the sum of each question, which ranges from 0 to 60, where higher scores represent higher disease activity.
The change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Month 3 and Month 6 was calculated as the difference between HAQ-D1 score reported at baseline and the HAQ-D1 score reported at Month 3 and Month 6.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
Participants measured the level of fatigue due to RA using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no fatigue to 100 = extreme fatigue.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
Participants measured the pain intensity due to RA using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no pain to 100 = unbearable pain.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
|
Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
The participant assessment of morning stiffness was measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no stiffness and 100 = maximum stiffness.
|
Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
June 1, 2014
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 5, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 7, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
September 12, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
July 21, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 10, 2016
Last Verified
June 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ML28144
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCWithdrawnActive Rheumatoid Arthritis; Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Centocor, Inc.CompletedRheumatoid Arthritis, Juvenile
-
Yuanyuan ZhangRecruitingRheumatoid Arthritis (RA) | Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease | Difficult-to-Treat Rheumatoid ArthritisChina
-
AmgenTerminated
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)CompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid ArthritisUnited States
-
AmgenImmunex CorporationCompletedJuvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSociete Francaise de RhumatologieRecruiting
-
University Hospital, ToulouseCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisFrance
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcEuropean CommissionCompletedRheumatoId ArthritisNetherlands, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia
-
David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical CenterCompleted
Clinical Trials on Observational study
-
Taysha Gene Therapies, Inc.Withdrawn
-
University of Castilla-La ManchaRecruitingKnee OsteoarthritisSpain
-
University of ManitobaCompletedObesity | Pregnancy | Cesarean SectionCanada
-
Drexel UniversityCompletedOsteoporosisUnited States
-
Oslo University HospitalThe Research Council of NorwayRecruitingMesothelioma | Pseudomyxoma Peritonei | Colorectal Carcinoma | Ovarian CarcinomaNorway
-
Oslo University HospitalThe Research Council of NorwayActive, not recruiting
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCRecruitingMalignant Solid Neoplasm | Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System NeoplasmUnited States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteRecruitingCigarette Smoking-Related CarcinomaUnited States
-
Children's Oncology GroupNot yet recruitingChildhood Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm | Childhood Malignant Solid Neoplasm
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterAmerican Association for Cancer ResearchRecruitingAnatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Breast Carcinoma | Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast CarcinomaUnited States