Reducing CVD Risk in Caregivers: A Brief Behavioral Activation Intervention

May 10, 2016 updated by: Brent Mausbach, University of California, San Diego
Cardiovascular disease and depression are some of the most costly illnesses to society, and caring for a loved-one with Alzheimer's disease has been associated with increased risk for both depression and cardiovascular disease. Indeed, depressive symptoms have been linked with elevated plasma concentrations of D-dimer and Interleukin-6 (IL-6), both of which are associated with increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). The present research tests a brief behavioral intervention for reducing both depressive symptoms and CVD biomarkers in Alzheimer caregivers. We hypothesize that caregivers receiving a brief Behavioral Activation (BA) therapy will show greater reductions in depressive symptoms and in CVD biomarkers relative to those randomized to a time-equivalent Information and Support (IS) therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Due to an aging society, the number of people diagnosed with dementia is expected to increase dramatically over the next two decades, with a concomitant rise in the number of family members providing informal care for their loved ones. The stresses associated with this care have been well-documented in the scientific literature, and are noted to be associated with increased risk for psychological and physical morbidity, particularly cardiovascular disease. Indeed, caregiving is associated with elevations in negative affect (e.g., depressive and anxiety symptoms), which in turn is associated with biological indicators that are thought to predict CVD risk (e.g., markers of coagulation and inflammation). The primary goal of this study is to examine the efficacy of a brief Behavioral Activation (BA) Treatment, called the Pleasant Events Program (PEP), for reducing biological CVD risk indicators in a sample of Alzheimer caregivers. We will enroll 100 dementia caregivers and randomly assign them to receive 4-sessions of PEP or 4-sessions of support + information. Our PEP intervention will be conducted in caregivers' homes and will emphasize the importance of monitoring and increasing activities that help individuals make contact with natural reinforcers in their environments, identifying and reducing negative coping responses, and selection and achievement of behavioral goals for healthier living. Caregivers will be assessed for our biological outcomes at baseline, post-treatment, and 1-year to determine intervention efficacy. Given the brief nature of the PEP intervention, the ease with which it can be applied in real-world settings (e.g., community agencies providing services to caregivers), and lack of difficult skills for interventionists and caregivers to acquire, we believe our PEP intervention will be easily transferred to "real-world" settings. If our PEP intervention is efficacious, it may have a considerable impact on both the physical and mental health of caregivers, and will likely have public health implications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • University of California San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 55 or older and providing at-home care for a care recipient (CR) with a physician-diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) or related dementia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving beta-blocking medications at enrollment
  • Receiving treatment with Anticoagulant medications
  • Severe hypertension (>200/120 mmHg)
  • Diagnosed with a terminal illness with a life expectancy <6 months
  • Enrolled in another intervention study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pleasant Events Program (PEP)
The Pleasant Events Program (PEP) is a Behavioral Activation (BA) treatment for depression. Participants receive 4 weekly sessions of face-to-face therapy (60 minutes each) to increase caregiver participation in pleasurable activities. Two additional phone sessions focus on continued behavioral activation for caregivers as well as problem-solving barriers to activation.
Behavioral: Pleasant Events Program (PEP)
Behavioral Activation Therapy
Active Comparator: Information-Support (IS)
Participants in the Information-Support (IS) control condition were provided with a resource manual consisting of topics commonly covered in support groups or information packets provided by community agencies. Topics included problem-solving and communication skills, cognitive reframing and behavioral management, self-care help, caregiver fact sheets on a range of social and mental health issues, placement information, financial and legal issues, and lists of local organizations and community resources available. Each IS session allowed caregivers to select issue(s) from the resource manual to discuss. The therapist covered the material based on the caregivers' needs. When requested by the caregiver, supportive psychotherapy was also provided.
Behavioral: Information Support (IS)
Information-Support (IS) condition consisted of supportive psychotherapy and informational brochures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline CESD at 8-weeks
The Brief CESD is a measure of depressive symptoms. The scale's minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 30. Lower scores represent fewer depressive symptoms and thus better outcomes.
Change from Baseline CESD at 8-weeks
D-dimer
Time Frame: Change from Baseline D-dimer at 8-weeks
D-dimer is an indicator of fibrin formation and its subsequent lysis and is a useful biomarker representing overall activation of blood coagulation. High concentrations of D-dimer have been linked prospectively to onset of Coronary Heart Disease. Blood was collected by a research nurse in the caregivers' homes through a 22 gauge forearm catheter after a 20 minute rest. Blood for D-dimer was dispensed into polypropylene tubes with 3.8 percent sodium citrate and spun at 1600 g for 10 minutes at room temperature. Obtained plasma was stored at minus 80 degrees Celsius until analyzed. Plasma D-dimer (Asserachrom Stago, Asnieres, France) was determined via high sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 5 percent.
Change from Baseline D-dimer at 8-weeks
Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline IL-6 at 8-weeks
IL-6 is one of many biomarkers represented in the inflammatory cascade which is initiated during an immune response. Prospectively, increased plasma IL-6 is also associated with future myocardial infarction in healthy men and increasing concentrations of IL-6 have been associated with both nonfatal myocardial infarction and fatal Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) in longitudinal studies of population-based cohorts. Higher concentrations of IL-6 raise CHD risk. Blood was collected by a research nurse in the caregivers' homes through a 22-gauge forearm catheter after a 20 min rest. Blood for IL-6 was dispensed in Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes and spun at 3000 g for 10 minutes at 4 to 8 degrees Celsius. Obtained plasma was stored at minus 80 degrees Celsius until analyzed. Plasma IL-6 (Meso Scale Discovery, Gaithersburg, MD) was determined via highsensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were less than 5 percent.
Change from Baseline IL-6 at 8-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Positive Affect at 8-weeks
This scales contains ten items assessing Positive Affect. Items included are adjectives, such as "interested," "strong," and "inspired". Participants rated each adjective based on how they felt over the past few weeks using a 5-point scale with responses ranging from 1 (very slightly to not at all) to 5 (extremely). The scale's minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 50. Higher scores represent better outcomes.
Change from Baseline Positive Affect at 8-weeks
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Negative Affect at 8-weeks
This scales contains ten items assessing Negative Affect. Items included are adjectives, such as "distressed," "ashamed," and Participants rated each adjective based on how they felt over the past few weeks using a 5-point scale with responses ranging from 1 (very slightly to not at all) to 5 (extremely). The scale's minimum score is 10 and maximum score is 50. Lower scores represent better outcomes.
Change from Baseline Negative Affect at 8-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of California, San Diego

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brent Mausbach, PhD, University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 1, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2016

Last Verified

May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R01AG031090 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Inflammation

Clinical Trials on Pleasant Events Program (PEP)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Philippines

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe