Words Generation in Compulsives Gamblers and Parkinson's Disease Patients (FLUENCE)

June 10, 2015 updated by: University Hospital, Toulouse

Study of Words Generation in Compulsives Gamblers and Healthy Volunteers: Comparison With a Study of Parkinson's Disease Patients

The pathophysiology of compulsive disorders as gambling could be close to behavior problems encountered in Parkinson's disease associated with a hyperactivity of the motivational system.

Thanks to the words generation test, which reflects the cortico-subcortical loop functioning, involved in motivation, we want to evaluate and compare using tools (words generation and behavioral tests) the motivational functioning of gamblers and healthy volunteers that we can then compare to that of Parkinson's patients with and without behavioral hyperdopaminergic disorders which were explored in another study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The main objective of this study is to evaluate performance during words generation in gamblers and healthy volunteers compare to those of PD patients with and without hyper-dopaminergic behaviors collected during another study.

2 groups of subjects will be recruited for the study: 20 compulsive gamblers and 20 healthy volunteers

Each subject will realize twice each test during 2 sessions with one hour in between :

During the session 1 :

  • The test of words generation, which is to produce action verbs in response to 40 nouns, and noun in response to verbs.
  • The test of Stroop that assesses selective attention

During the session 2:

  • The test of words generation, which is to produce action verbs in response to 40 nouns, and noun in response to verbs.
  • The task of the casino (Iowa Gambling Test)
  • The task of landing
  • The test of Stroop

We supposed that the performance of compulsive gamblers in words generation test will be higher than those of healthy volunteers, themselves superior to those of PD patients with a hyper-dopaminergic behavior, themselves superior to those of PD patient without hyper-dopaminergic behavior.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

37

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • CHU Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For healthy volunteers :

  • Subject from 30 to 75 years old (Male and female)
  • Subject with French mother tongue
  • Subject who give their informed and signed consent.
  • Subject affiliated to a social protection program

For compulsive gamblers :

  • Subject from 30 to 75 years old (Male and female)
  • Subject with French mother tongue
  • Subject with at least 5 criteria of 10 DSM IV diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling
  • Subject who give their informed and signed consent.
  • Subject affiliated to a social protection program

Exclusion Criteria:

For healthy volunteers and compulsive gamblers :

  • Presence of apathy defined as a score greater or equal to 14 on the scale of Starkstein
  • Presence of severe depression defined as a score greater or equal to 25 on the scale BDI (Beck Depression Inventory)
  • Presence of dementia defined as a score below 25 on the MMSE
  • Subject with vision problems making it impossible for the tests
  • Pregnant women
  • Subject under tutelage, curatelle or law protection
  • Subject included in an other clinical study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: healthy volunteers
evaluation of word generation and of motivation

Each subject will realize twice each test during 2 sessions with one hour in between :

During the session 1 :

  • The test of words generation, which is to produce action verbs in response to 40 nouns, and noun in response to verbs.
  • The test of Stroop that assesses selective attention

During the session 2:

  • The test of words generation, which is to produce action verbs in response to 40 nouns, and noun in response to verbs.
  • The task of the casino (Iowa Gambling Test)
  • The task of landing
  • The test of Stroop
Other: compulsive gamblers
evaluation of word generation and of motivation

Each subject will realize twice each test during 2 sessions with one hour in between :

During the session 1 :

  • The test of words generation, which is to produce action verbs in response to 40 nouns, and noun in response to verbs.
  • The test of Stroop that assesses selective attention

During the session 2:

  • The test of words generation, which is to produce action verbs in response to 40 nouns, and noun in response to verbs.
  • The task of the casino (Iowa Gambling Test)
  • The task of landing
  • The test of Stroop

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changement of number of mistake during the words generation test
Time Frame: one hour
one hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
changement of number of uncorrected errors during the Stroop test which reflects the incapacity to inhibit the reading and that evaluates attention
Time Frame: one hour
one hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christine Brefel, MD, Uh Toulouse

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

June 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2015

Last Verified

June 1, 2015

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on evaluation of word generation and of motivation

3
Subscribe