Sub-Study of the PREVIEW Study Australia

Sub-Study of the PREVIEW Study Australia: Effects of Weight Loss on Appetite, Bone Mass and Muscle Strength

The aim of this study is to investigate possible enduring effects of a standard 2-month weight loss program on appetite regulation, bone homeostasis and muscle strength in younger and older adults, as well as the impact of differences in dietary composition during weight maintenance.

Study Overview

• Status: Active, not recruiting
• Conditions: Obesity; Pre-diabetes
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Low calorie diet administered from 0 to 2 months; Behavioral: High Protein / Low Glycaemic Index; Behavioral: Moderate Protein / High Glycaemic Index

Detailed Description

This sub-study consists of 2 parts:

PART 1. Durability of changes in appetite and appetite-regulating hormones after weight loss in overweight or obese pre-diabetic adults: impact of diet during weight maintenance.

A major reason for the failure of many lifestyle-based weight loss attempts is that the body responds to energy restriction and weight loss with a series of adaptive responses that prevent ongoing weight loss and promote weight regain (Sainsbury and Zhang 2010; Sainsbury and Zhang 2012). This 'famine reaction' includes increased appetite and alterations in circulating concentrations of gut-derived hormones that tend to stimulate appetite and promote fat accumulation. Recent evidence suggests that these alterations are sustained for as long as the lower body weight is maintained (Sumithran et al 2011). This finding - if validated in other populations - has enormous implications for clinical practice. For instance, if we know for certain that the weight loss-induced increase in appetite cannot be reversed without weight regain, or if we can identify those individuals for whom the increase in appetite does not subside, then multiple fruitless and heartbreaking efforts to lose excess weight via lifestyle interventions could be circumvented, and those individuals could immediately be channelled into more aggressive - albeit still imperfect - treatment options (i.e. long-term appetite-suppressing medications, bariatric surgery). If, on the other hand, we know that the increased appetite following weight loss does subside following a period of weight maintenance at the lower weight, or if we could identify those individuals for whom this is possible, then this information could be used to promote compliance with weight maintenance strategies after weight loss, with patient messages such as; "Keeping weight off will be difficult in the beginning, but don't give up because it will likely become easier with time".

A substantial body of research shows that a diet that is higher in protein (Westerterp-Plantenga et al 2004) and lower in glycaemic index (Brand-Miller et al 2002) than the diet that is conventionally recommended for health may help people to maintain a lower body weight post weight loss, and that this benefit may occur by reducing the drive to eat. These findings raise the possibility that a higher protein and lower glycaemic index weight maintenance diet could be used to reduce the intensity of the famine reaction in overweight or obese people after completion of weight loss diets, thereby improving their likelihood of keeping the weight off. While there is ample research showing the benefits of a higher protein diet for reducing appetite, enhancing weight loss and preserving lean body mass loss when applied during energy restricted weight loss programs, as recently reviewed (Soenen et al 2013), there is relatively little work to date about the emerging benefits of a higher protein diet applied during a weight maintenance program after weight loss. The importance of this Sub-Study (Part 1) is that it not only seeks to confirm a controversial new finding that has potentially enormous implications for the clinical management of overweight and obesity (Sumithran et al 2011), it also investigates the potential benefit of a higher protein and lower GI diet - applied during the weight maintenance phase after a standardized weight loss program - to prevent the apparently permanent increase in appetite that overweight and obese people have been reported in one study (Sumithran et al 2011) to experience in response to weight loss.

Part 1 Hypothesis:

• Both overweight and obese individuals will demonstrate increases in appetite and corresponding changes in appetite-regulating hormones in response to a standardized low calorie diet weight loss program, and these effects will be normalized within 4-10 months on a weight maintenance program in overweight but not in obese individuals.
• In both overweight and obese individuals, a higher protein and lower glycaemic index weight maintenance diet after a weight-reducing diet will improve normalisation of appetite and appetite-regulating hormones compared to a moderate protein and moderate glycaemic index weight maintenance diet.

Part 1 Aim:

• To determine fasting appetite and fasting circulating concentrations of appetite-regulating hormones (ghrelin and peptide YY) after a 2-month standardized low calorie diet in overweight and obese pre-diabetic adults, and to determine whether any effects are attenuated by 4 and 10 months on one of two different weight maintenance programs differing in protein content and glycaemic index.

PART 2. Effect of weight loss on bone homeostasis and muscle strength in younger and older overweight or obese pre-diabetic adults: impact of diet during weight maintenance on long-term durability of effects.

While it is generally recognised that losing excess weight helps to prevent disease development in younger adults, there is some controversy as to whether weight loss programs are indicated for the management of overweight or obesity in older adults, and if so, at what body mass index such programs should be implemented (Chapman 2008). It is noteworthy that weight loss via voluntary or involuntary means in older adults is linked to reduced function, reduced quality of life and increased mortality (Chapman 2008). The reason for this relationship is not clear, but one possibility is that weight loss programs can lead to significant loss of bone and lean tissues under certain circumstances (e.g. inadequate dietary protein, inadequate exercise), and it is unknown if these losses are recuperated. Given that reductions in bone density and lean body mass are risk factors for fractures and falls in older adults, changes in body composition in response to weight loss efforts in older adults could inadvertently produce negative effects. In light of the established role of dietary protein in the maintenance of lean tissues such as bone and muscle in older people or in response to weight loss (Westerterp-Plantenga et al 2012), the PREVIEW trial offers an invaluable opportunity to investigate the effects of a standardised weight loss program on bone homeostasis and muscle function (strength) in younger and older adults, as well as the impact of differences in diet during weight maintenance in attenuating any such effects.

Part 2 Hypothesis:

• That a 2-month standardized low calorie diet weight loss program leads to reductions in bone mass and muscle strength in both younger and older adults, particularly in older adults, and that these parameters return towards baseline values within 3 years in younger but not in older adults.
• That a higher protein weight-maintenance diet improves the restoration of bone mass and muscle strength after weight loss in both younger and older adults.

Part 2 Aim:

• To measure bone mass, bone turnover and muscle strength in younger (25-45 year old) and older (55-70 year old) adults before and after a standardized 2-month weight loss program, as well as at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after commencement of the weight loss program.
• To compare the effects of two different weight maintenance programs differing in protein content on the restoration of bone homeostasis and muscle strength after a standardized 2-month weight loss diet. The weight maintenance programs are of 10 months' duration and are administered immediately after the 2-month weight loss program.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 292
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Australia
  • New South Wales
    • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2006
      • The University of Sydney
    • Darlinghurst, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
      • Garvan Institute of Medical Research
    • Randwick, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2031
      • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 25 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Age 25 - 45 years and 55 - 70 years
• Overweight or obesity status BMI>25 kg/m2
• Pre-diabetes. The criteria from WHO/IDF (International Diabetes Foundation) for assessing pre-diabetes will be used as the formal inclusion criteria, i.e. having: Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG): Fasting venous plasma glucose concentration 5.6 - 6.9 mmol/l or Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT): Venous Plasma glucose concentration of 7.8 - 11.0 mmol/l at 2 h after oral administration of 75 g glucose (oral glucose tolerance test, OGTT), with fasting plasma glucose less than 7.0 mmol/l. Due to potential between-lab variation (local assessments), HbA1c is not used as an inclusion criteria in the screening.
• Informed consent required
• Ethnic group - No restrictions
• Smoking - Smoking is allowed, provided subjects have not recently (within 1 month) changed habits. However, smoking status is monitored throughout the study and used as a confounding variable.
• Motivation - Motivation and willingness to be randomized to any of the groups and to do his/hers best to follow the given protocol
• Other - Able to participate at CID's during normal working hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

Based on interview and/or questionnaire, individuals with the following problems will be excluded:

• Medical conditions as known by the subjects: Diabetes mellitus (other than gestational diabetes mellitus); Significant cardiovascular disease including current angina; myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 6 months; heart failure; symptomatic peripheral vascular disease; Systolic blood pressure above 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure above 100 mmHg whether on or off treatment for hypertension. If being treated, no change in drug treatment within last 3 months; Advanced chronic renal impairment; Significant liver disease e.g. cirrhosis (fatty liver disease allowed); Malignancy which is currently active or in remission for less than five years after last treatment (local basal and squamous cell skin cancer allowed); Active inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, chronic pancreatitis or other disorder potentially causing malabsorption; Previous bariatric surgery; Chronic respiratory, neurological, musculoskeletal or other disorders where, in the judgement of the investigator, participants would have unacceptable risk or difficulty in complying with the protocol (e.g. physical activity program); A recent surgical procedure until after full convalescence (investigators judgement); Transmissible blood-borne diseases e.g. hepatitis B, HIV; Psychiatric illness (e.g. major depression, bipolar disorder).
• Medication: Use currently or within the previous 3 months of prescription medication that has the potential of affecting body weight or glucose metabolism such as glucocorticoids (but excluding inhaled and topical steroids; bronchodilators are allowed), psychoactive medication, epileptic medication, or weight loss medications (either prescription, over the counter or herbal). Low dose antidepressants are allowed if they, in the judgement of the investigator, do not affect weight or participation to the study protocol. Levothyroxine for treatment of hypothyroidism is allowed if the participant has been on a stable dose for at least 3 months.
• Personal/Other: Engagement in competitive sports; Self-reported weight change of >5 % (increase or decrease) within 2 months prior to screening; Special diets (e.g. vegan, Atkins) within 2 months prior to study start. A lacto-vegetarian diet is allowed; Severe food intolerance expected to interfere with the study; Regularly drinking > 21 alcoholic units/week (men), or > 14 alcoholic units/week (women); Use of drugs of abuse within the previous 12 months; Blood donation or transfusion within the past 1 month before baseline or CID's; Self-reported eating disorders; Pregnancy or lactation, including plans to become pregnant within the next 36 months; No access to either phone or Internet (this is necessary when being contacted by the instructor's during the maintenance phase); Adequate understanding of national language; Psychological or behavioral problems which, in the judgement of the investigator, would lead to difficulty in complying with the protocol.
• Laboratory screening: If all of the above criteria are satisfied, the participant is eligible for a glucose tolerance test (blood at 0 and 120 mins), and blood glucose concentrations are analyzed immediately (Haemocue). In addition full blood count, urea, and electrolytes may be analyzed as a further safety evaluation.
• ONLY IF the glucose tolerance test meets the entry criteria for the study, the remaining samples are sent to the local laboratory for a safety check, with the following exclusion criteria: Hemoglobin concentration below local laboratory reference values (i.e. anemia); Creatinine >1.5 times Upper Limit of Normal (local laboratory reference values); Alanine Transaminase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Transaminase (AST) >3 times the Upper Limit of Normal (local laboratory reference values); Or any other significant abnormality on these tests which in the investigators opinion may be clinically significant and require further assessment.
• Electrocardiography (ECG). Any abnormality which in the opinion of the investigator might indicate undiagnosed cardiac disease requiring further assessment (e.g. significant conduction disorder, arrhythmia, pathological Q waves). This is done in adults 55-70 years of age.
• After LCD phase (in adults): Failure to reach at least 8% weight reduction during the LCD phase. This leads to exclusion from the intervention.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High Protein / Low Glycaemic Index; A 10-month weight maintenance diet, administered from the 2-month to the 12-month time point, where protein intake is 25% of energy intake, carbohydrate intake is 45% of energy intake, dietary glycaemic index is < 55. Please see parent study for further Arm details: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=preview&rank=1	Behavioral: Low calorie diet administered from 0 to 2 months; The 2-month low calorie diet is administered from the 0 months to the 2 months time point. It is designed to elicit a weight loss of 8% of initial body weight. Please see parent study for further intervention details: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=preview&rank=1; Other Names: 2-month low calorie diet; 2-month standardized low calorie diet; 2-month Cambridge Diet; 2-month low energy diet; Behavioral: High Protein / Low Glycaemic Index; Please see description of the Arm by the same name.
Active Comparator: Moderate Protein / High Glycaemic Index; A 10-month weight maintenance diet, administered from the 2-month to the 12-month time point, where protein intake is 15% of energy intake, carbohydrate intake is 55% of energy intake, dietary glycaemic index is > 65. Please see parent study for further Arm details: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=preview&rank=1	Behavioral: Low calorie diet administered from 0 to 2 months; The 2-month low calorie diet is administered from the 0 months to the 2 months time point. It is designed to elicit a weight loss of 8% of initial body weight. Please see parent study for further intervention details: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=preview&rank=1; Other Names: 2-month low calorie diet; 2-month standardized low calorie diet; 2-month Cambridge Diet; 2-month low energy diet; Behavioral: Moderate Protein / High Glycaemic Index; Please see description of the Arm by the same name.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Fasting appetite	Previous research has shown that a weight reducing diet increases appetite in the fasting state. There is some suggestion that this diet-induced increase in appetite is sustained even after following a weight maintenance diet for 12 months. We will assess fasting appetite using visual analogue scales after commencement of the standardized weight loss diet. This primary outcome will demonstrate whether the weight-loss-induced increase in fasting appetite that is anticipated at completion of the diet will be normalized by the 12 month time point, and whether the type of weight maintenance diet (High Protein / Low Glycaemic Index versus Moderate Protein / High Glycaemic Index) influences this.	12 months
Bone mass	We will assess bone mineral density and bone mineral content in the lumbar spine and hip (or wrist for people in whom arthritis interferes with the reading) via dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at 2 months after commencement of the standardized weight loss diet. This primary outcome will help determine whether there is a difference between younger and older participants with respect to changes in bone mass with weight reduction, and whether the type of weight maintenance diet influences this.	2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Fasting appetite		0 months
Fasting appetite		2 months
Fasting appetite		6 months
Fasting appetite		24 months
Fasting appetite		36 months
Fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones	Previous research has shown that a weight reducing diet alters fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite regulating hormones in a way that would be expected to increase appetite (i.e. increased ghrelin and decreased peptide YY). We will assess fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones (ghrelin and peptide YY).	0 months
Fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones		2 months
Fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones		6 months
Fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones		12 months
Fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones		24 months
Fasting plasma concentrations of gut-derived appetite-regulating hormones		36 months
Bone mass		0 months
Bone mass		2 months
Bone mass		6 months
Bone mass		24 months
Bone mass		36 months
Bone turnover	The bone turnover markers to be measured are serum procollagen type-I N-propeptide (P1NP, a marker of bone formation) and serum C-telopeptide of type-I collagen (CTX, a marker of bone resporption). This outcome will enable us to determine whether there is a difference between younger and older participants with respect to changes in bone turnover with weight reduction, and whether the type of weight maintenance diet (High Protein / Low Glycaemic Index versus Moderate Protein / High Glycaemic Index) influences this. This outcome is important because DXA scanning to assess bone mass can result in artefactual results in people with obesity or who are undergoing changes in body fat mass, as will be the case in this trial.	0 months
Bone turnover		2 months
Bone turnover		6 months
Bone turnover		12 months
Bone turnover		24 months
Bone turnover		36 months
Modulators of bone turnover	Pending funding availability: serum 25-OH vitamin D, serum parathyroid hormone, serum calcium, serum phosphate, serum albumin and serum creatine.	0 months
Modulators of bone turnover		2 months
Modulators of bone turnover		6 months
Modulators of bone turnover		12 months
Modulators of bone turnover		24 months
Modulators of bone turnover		36 months
Muscle (handgrip) strength	Muscle (handgrip) strength will be determined with a handheld dynamometer. This secondary outcome measure aims to determine whether the standardized weight loss diet induces changes in muscle strength, and whether there is any differential effect in younger versus older participants.	0 months
Muscle (handgrip) strength		2 months
Muscle (handgrip) strength	If the investigators see a change from baseline in muscle (handgrip) strength after the low calorie diet in the younger or older participants, then they will measure muscle (handgrip) strength again at 6 months, to determine whether any such change from baseline is maintained after the two different weight maintenance programs. This secondary outcome will enable determination of whether any effects of the standardized low calorie diet on muscle (handgrip) strength are sustained at 6 months, and whether the type of weight maintenance diet (High Protein / Low Glycaemic Index versus Moderate Protein / High Glycaemic Index) influences this.	6 months
Muscle (handgrip) strength		12 months
Muscle (handgrip) strength		24 months
Muscle (handgrip) strength		36 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Urinary N-terminal telopeptide	Urinary N-terminal telopeptide (NTX) is a marker of bone resorption. While the investigators have selected to measure serum CTX as their marker of bone turnover (resorption), some laboratories in Australia and around the world still use NTX as a marker of bone resorption. The investigators will thus collect urine samples for the potential assay of NTX, should a journal reviewer request this data upon review of our resultant manuscript, and provided that funding is available.	0 months
Urinary N-terminal telopeptide		2 months
Urinary N-terminal telopeptide		6 months
Urinary N-terminal telopeptide		12 months
Urinary N-terminal telopeptide		24 months
Urinary N-terminal telopeptide		36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Sydney
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Amanda Salis (nee Sainsbury), PhD, University of Sydney

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, Purcell K, Shulkes A, Kriketos A, Proietto J. Long-term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 27;365(17):1597-604. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105816.
• Sainsbury A, Zhang L. Role of the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus in regulation of body weight during energy deficit. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2010 Mar 25;316(2):109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.09.025. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
• Sainsbury A, Zhang L. Role of the hypothalamus in the neuroendocrine regulation of body weight and composition during energy deficit. Obes Rev. 2012 Mar;13(3):234-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00948.x. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
• Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Lejeune MP, Nijs I, van Ooijen M, Kovacs EM. High protein intake sustains weight maintenance after body weight loss in humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Jan;28(1):57-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802461.
• Brand-Miller JC, Holt SH, Pawlak DB, McMillan J. Glycemic index and obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):281S-5S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76/1.281S.
• Soenen S, Martens EA, Hochstenbach-Waelen A, Lemmens SG, Westerterp-Plantenga MS. Normal protein intake is required for body weight loss and weight maintenance, and elevated protein intake for additional preservation of resting energy expenditure and fat free mass. J Nutr. 2013 May;143(5):591-6. doi: 10.3945/jn.112.167593. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
• Chapman IM. Obesity in old age. Front Horm Res. 2008;36:97-106. doi: 10.1159/000115358.
• Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Lemmens SG, Westerterp KR. Dietary protein - its role in satiety, energetics, weight loss and health. Br J Nutr. 2012 Aug;108 Suppl 2:S105-12. doi: 10.1017/S0007114512002589.
• Buso MEC, Seimon RV, McClintock S, Muirhead R, Atkinson FS, Brodie S, Dodds J, Zibellini J, Das A, Wild-Taylor AL, Burk J, Fogelholm M, Raben A, Brand-Miller JC, Sainsbury A. Can a Higher Protein/Low Glycemic Index vs. a Conventional Diet Attenuate Changes in Appetite and Gut Hormones Following Weight Loss? A 3-Year PREVIEW Sub-study. Front Nutr. 2021 Mar 22;8:640538. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.640538. eCollection 2021.

Helpful Links

• This is a sub-study of a larger study registered on ClinicalTrials.gov - Effect of Diet and Physical Activity on Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes (PREVIEW): NCT01777893

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: January 1, 2014
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2018
• Study Completion (Anticipated): December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 12, 2013
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 6, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): January 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 30, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 28, 2021
• Last Verified: April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Obesity; Muscle strength; Pre-diabetes; Appetite; Ghrelin; Visual analogue scale; Bone mass; Bone turnover; Peptide YY; Low calorie diet; Diet - reducing
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Metabolic Diseases; Endocrine System Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Prediabetic State; Glucose Intolerance
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2013/535 - SUB-STUDY; KBBE-CALL- 6-Nr. 312057 (Other Grant/Funding Number: EUROPEAN COMMISSION (FRAMEWORK 7 GRANT))