- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02075801
10-years Clinical Trial of Sealed of Margin Failures (Sealant)
Longitudinal Results of a 10-years Clinical Trial of Sealed Margin Failures of Amalgam Restorations
- Assess the effectiveness of sealing localized marginal defects of amalgam restorations that were initially scheduled for replacement of restorations.
- The hypothesis was that sealed defective margins of the amalgam restorations shows similar performance than replacement amalgam restorations.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Design
Were examined 157 patients with 586 amalgam restorations that were recruited at the Operative Dentistry Clinic, at the Dental School, University of Chile with the indication of amalgam replacements, of them, a cohort of thirty two patients (19 females and 13 males, mean age = 27 years old), with 73 Class I amalgam restorations, that presented one or more localized margin defects (Bravo or Charlie according to modified United State Public Health Service, USPHS criteria), were included in the study. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Research Ethics Committee of the Dental School at the University of Chile, Investigation Project, School of Dentistry (0205) and all patients signed the informed consent form and completed the registration form. Only Faculty members were accepted to provide the treatment.
Treatment Groups Criteria: 73 restorations with defective margins were evaluated in accordance with the modified USPHS criteria and assigned to either the sealant (n=26), repair (n=21) and control groups (n=26).
Restorations Assessment: The quality of the restorations were evaluated using the modified U.S. Public Health System/Ryge criteria. Two examiners assessed the restorations independently and by visual and tactile (mouth mirror number 5) examination using an explorer (N° 23) and indirectly by radiographic, examination, for interproximal observation (Bite Wing). All the restorations were examined at baseline and each year during four and ten years after treatment. The restorations assessment was carried out by five parameters: marginal adaptation (MA), roughness (R), secondary caries (SC), marginal stain (MS) and teeth sensitivity (TS). If any difference was recorded between the 2 independent examiners, and they did not reach an agreement, a third clinician was called to assist with the process decision. If the three clinicians they did not reach an agreement, the lower score was recorded. All three clinicians participated in calibration exercises at the beginning and before the last examination took place and the inter-examiner reliability results were Kappa=0.74 at the baseline and Kappa=0.87 at the ten year.
A change from Bravo to Alpha was considered an improvement and a change from Alpha to Bravo was considered downgrade.
Caries risk assessment: A graphical computed program (CARIOGRAM) was used for individual´s patients caries risk assessed, the program weighted the interaction between the following 10 caries related factors: Caries experience, related general disease, diet contents, diet frequency, plaque amount by Silness Löe Index, semi quantitative detection of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in saliva by Caries Risk Test (CRT), fluoride program, amount of saliva stimulated secretion by CRT Buffer (Vivadent), saliva buffer capacity and clinical judgment. Patients were classifying in high, intermediate and low caries risk. Additionally the results also indicate where targeted actions to improve the situation will have the best effect.
Patients were recalled ten years after the treatment, for clinical assessment by the same examiners, applying the same criteria used at baseline. Failed restorations were removed from the study and treated according to the diagnosed needs.
Statistical analysis The ordinal dependent variable was changed in level of the modified USPHS criteria from the baseline value. The assigned score of each restoration reflected the worst result for any of the parameters. The results of each group in terms of degradation or upgrade were analyzed by Friedman range non-parametric test to compare the pre and postoperative conditions. Additionally, the performance of all groups was contrasted using the Mann Whitney test to determine the differences between the upgrade and downgrade of the restoration´s quality. The statistical significance was set at 95%, α=0.05 and β=0.80 for statistical analysis.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Region Metropolitana
-
Santiago, Region Metropolitana, Chile
- University of Chile
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Patients with amalgam restorations with marginal deficiencies that were judged to be suitable for sealing.
- Older than 18 years of age ¨
- More than 20 teeth in their mouth
- The restorations had to be in functional occlusion with an opposing natural tooth
- With at least one proximal contact area with and adjacent tooth
- Area out of the restoration´s failures in good condition
- Patients who agree and sign the informed consent for participating in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with contraindications for regular dental treatment based on their medical history
- Special aesthetic requirements that could not be solved by this alternative treatment
- Xerostomia or who were taking medication that significantly decreased salivary flow
- High caries risk
- Psychiatric or physical diseases, that interfered with teeth hygiene.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Defective amalgam restorations
Treatment Groups: A. Sealing of amalgam margin defects: Defective areas were acid etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. A resin-based sealant (Sealant, 3MESPE)was applied over the defective area. The sealant was polymerized with a photo curing unit (Curing-Light 2500, 3MESPE) for 40 seconds. Rubber dam isolation was used for this procedure. All treatments were applied by the same clinician. B. Replacement Group: The clinician totally removed and replaces the defective restoration with a new amalgam (Tytin, Kerr, Orange, USA). Rubber dam isolation was used for this procedure. All treatments were applied by the same clinician. C. Control Group: The defective restorations did not receive any treatment. |
Comparison between sealing of amalgam margins defects, replacement and non treated groups.
A.Sealing of amalgam margin defects: were acid etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 15 seconds. A resin-based sealant (Clinpro Sealant, 3MESPE) was applied over the defective area. The sealant was polymerized with a photocuring unit (Curing Light 2500, 3M ESPE) for 40 seconds. Rubber dam isolation was used for this procedure. All treatments were applied by the same clinician. B.Replacement Group: The clinician totally removed and replaces the defective restoration with a new amalgam (Tytin, Kerr Corporation, Orange, CA, USA). Rubber dam isolation was used for this procedure. All treatments were applied by the same clinician. C.Control Group: The defective restorations did not receive any treatment.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Changes of Amalgam restorations quality according to United Stated Public Health Service (USPHS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 10 after treatment
|
Restorations Assessment: The quality of the restorations were evaluated using the modified U.S. Public Health System criteria.
Two examiners assessed the restorations independently and by visual and tactile examination.
All the restorations were examined at baseline and ten years after treatment.
The restorations assessment was carried out by five parameters: marginal adaptation, roughness, secondary caries, marginal stain and teeth sensitivity.
All three clinicians participated in calibration exercises at the beginning and before the last examination took place and the inter-examiner reliability results were Kappa=0.74 at the baseline and Kappa=0.87 at the ten year.
|
Baseline and 10 after treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Gustavo Moncada, DDS, University of Chile
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Martin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G. Management of Class I and Class II Amalgam Restorations with Localized Defects: Five-Year Results. Int J Dent. 2013;2013:450260. doi: 10.1155/2013/450260. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
- Martin J, Fernandez E, Estay J, Gordan VV, Mjor IA, Moncada G. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):125-33. doi: 10.2341/12-062C. Epub 2012 Jul 11.
- Moncada G, Angel P, Fernandez E, Alonso P, Martin J, Gordan VV. Bond strength evaluation of nanohybrid resin-based composite repair. Gen Dent. 2012 May-Jun;60(3):230-4.
- Fernandez EM, Martin JA, Angel PA, Mjor IA, Gordan VV, Moncada GA. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J. 2011;22(2):134-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000200008.
- Moncada G, Martin J, Fernandez E, Hempel MC, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009 Apr;140(4):425-32. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0191.
- Moncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008 May-Jun;33(3):258-64. doi: 10.2341/07-113.
- Moncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro MJ, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Gen Dent. 2006 Sep-Oct;54(5):314-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PRI-ODO-0207
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Dental Caries Secondary to Acquired Defects of Tooth Structure
-
Amina Fouad FaragCompletedDental Caries Secondary to Polymorphisms | Polymorphisms in Enamel Encoding GenesEgypt
-
Texas A & M University Baylor College Of DentistryUnknownDental Caries Extending to Pulp
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingPrevalence of Dental Caries and Its Relation to Screen Time and Sugar Consumption | Prevalence,PatientEgypt
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUnknownDental Caries | Secondary Dental CariesBrazil
-
British University In EgyptCompletedDental Implant Failed | Dental Caries Extending to PulpEgypt
-
Jordan University of Science and TechnologyUnknownDental Pulp Capping | Dental Caries Extending to PulpJordan
-
Medical College of WisconsinRecruitingDental Caries in Children | Dental Caries Class II | Dental Caries on Smooth Surface Limited to EnamelUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingPulp Disease, Dental | Dental Caries Extending to PulpTurkey
-
Daniela Prócida RaggioAcademic Centre for Dentistry in AmsterdamCompletedDental Caries Extending Into Dentine | Caries Involving Multiple Surfaces of Tooth | Dental Caries on Chewing Surface of ToothBrazil
Clinical Trials on Sealing of amalgam margin defects
-
Region Örebro CountyThe Scandinavian Obesity Surgery RegistryCompleted
-
NORCE Norwegian Research Centre ASUniversity of Bergen; University of Witten/Herdecke; National Research Centre...CompletedHealth Complaints Attributed to Dental Amalgam RestorationsNorway
-
University of BergenNORCE Norwegian Research Centre ASCompletedAdverse Effects | Dental Restoration, PermanentNorway
-
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical...Not yet recruiting
-
Western University, CanadaCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityTerminated
-
Region Örebro CountyCompletedThe Prevalence of Surgery for Small Bowel Obstruction After LGBP Procedure.Sweden
-
R.P.HerrmannUnknownSurgically-Created Resection CavityAustralia
-
GreenBone Ortho S.p.A.TerminatedBone Substitutes | Bone DefectBosnia and Herzegovina, Israel, Italy, Serbia, Slovenia, United Kingdom
-
Mansoura UniversityCompleted