Impact of the Radiographic Examination on Diagnosis and Treatment Decision of Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth (CARDEC-1)

May 21, 2020 updated by: Fausto Medeiros Mendes, University of Sao Paulo

CARies DEtection in Children - Impact of the Radiographic Examination on Diagnosis and Treatment Decision of Caries Lesions in Primary Teeth

Radiographs have been used to aid dentists in detecting the presence of cavities in the deciduous teeth of children. This procedure is globally recommended because the conventional clinical examination usually overlooks some cavities. However, the real benefit of performing dental radiographs for this purpose is still unclear. Besides the hazards of ionizing radiation, the radiographs could provoke overtreatment of the children; hence, dentists would tend to restore more teeth than would be really necessary. Nowadays, it is preferable to overlook some cavities than treat the teeth unnecessarily. Therefore, the investigators aimed to perform this study to compare two different strategies for detecting cavities in deciduous teeth of children: one based on clinical examination performed alone and other using radiographs adjunct to the clinical examination. To compare these strategies, the investigators will consider outcomes related to children's health and welfare.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Despite most clinical guidelines throughout the world indicate that the clinicians take two bitewings for detecting caries lesions in primary molars of asymptomatic children, the evidence for this recommendation is based in cross-sectional studies performed in laboratorial setting or using convenience samples. The benefits and impact of performing radiographs on diagnosis and treatment decision of caries lesions in primary teeth, considering relevant outcomes for the patients, have not been evaluated yet. Thus, the aim of this study will be to evaluate the impact of performing radiographic examination for detecting caries lesions in primary teeth compared with the visual inspection performed alone, considering different outcomes related to the validity and children's health and welfare. For this, three different studies will be carried out according the following specific aims: (1) to evaluate the validity of radiographic examination adjunct to the visual inspection in detecting proximal caries lesions in primary molars in children with low and high caries experience through a cross-sectional design; (2) to evaluate the impact of radiographic examination adjunct to the visual inspection on the diagnostic and treatment decision of caries lesions in primary teeth in a before and after study; and (3) to evaluate the impact of radiographic examination adjunct to the visual inspection for detecting caries lesions in primary teeth on operative needs in the follow-ups and impact of oral health on the quality of life through a randomized clinical trial. To reach these objectives, 250 children aged 3 to 6 years who looked for dental treatment in our dental school will be randomly allocated in two groups according to the diagnostic strategy used for caries detection: visual inspection performed alone (control group) or visual inspection associated to radiographic examination (experimental group). After elaboration of treatment decision plan for two examiners, the children will be treated and followed-up for 2 years, with evaluations after 12 and 24 months after the ingress of the children in the study. The primary outcome will be the number of dental surfaces with dental treatment need in the follow-up, considering the aim (3). Then, children allocated in the control group will be reevaluated using radiographic examination, and the performance of two strategies for detecting proximal caries lesions will be evaluated, using temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers for one week as reference standard method. Moreover, a new treatment plan will be performed and compared with the treatment plan based on visual inspection alone. These two parts of the research will be carried out to reach the aims (1) and (2), respectively. Our working hypothesis is that the radiographic examination would actually exert little influence on outcomes related to the validity and children's health and welfare, and that visual inspection would be enough as diagnostic strategy for caries detection in primary teeth.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

252

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sao Paulo, Brazil, 05508-000
        • School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children who sought dental treatment in our dental school (School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil)
  • Children aged 3 to 6 years
  • Children with al least one primary molar in the mouth.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children whose parents refuse to participate of the research
  • Children presenting behavior problems during the treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Visual inspection
Dental treatment performed according to the caries diagnosis obtained with visual inspection performed alone
Dental treatment of all dental needs present in the children related or not to the dental caries.
Experimental: Radiographic examination
Dental treatment performed according to the caries diagnosis obtained with visual inspection and additional radiographic method.
Dental treatment of all dental needs present in the children related or not to the dental caries.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of dental surfaces with operative treatment needs
Time Frame: 24 months
The number of dental surfaces with operative treatment needs after the follow-ups will be composed by number of surfaces with new caries lesions; number of restored surfaces with necessity of replacement; tooth with pain episode and/or necessity of endodontic treatment and tooth indicated for extraction.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of surfaces with new caries lesions
Time Frame: 24 months
Dental surfaces presenting caries lesions in the foloow-up examinations that require operative treatment.
24 months
Number of restored surfaces with necessity of replacement
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of restored dental surfaces that requires repair or replacement.
24 months
Episodes of dental pain and/or primary teeth with pulpal involvement
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of primary teeth that presented pain episodes or that require endodontic treatment in the follow-up examinations
24 months
Primary teeth indicated for extraction due to caries
Time Frame: 24 months
Number of primary teeth indicated for extraction due caries involvment.
24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Impact of Oral Health on quality of life
Time Frame: 24 months
Impact of Oral Health on quality of life of the children participants in the study, measured by a validated questionnaire (ECOHIS)
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Dental treatment

Subscribe