Insole Sensor to Determine Optimal Limb Loading

October 24, 2017 updated by: David Rothberg, University of Utah

Development and Clinical Trial of an Insole Sensor to Determine Optimal Limb Loading in the Rehabilitation of OTA Type 42IIIB and IIIC Lower Extremity Fractures

The purpose of this study is to use a novel load monitoring technology to correlate limb loading to OTA type 42IIIB and IIIC tibial fracture outcomes. This study will be the first to collect continuous limb loading data and will provide the first objective insight into how limb loading directs fracture healing. To meet this purpose, two specific aims have been developed.

Specific Aim 1: Preclinical validation of a load-monitoring insole

The Hitchcock laboratory has overcome the greatest technical hurdle for continuous limb load monitoring: development of load sensor technology that is affordable, accurate and capable of monitoring for over four weeks. To develop this sensor technology into a load-monitoring insole, the Hitchcock lab will incorporate consumer type electronics into the design, including a microprocessor, battery, and data storage media.

Following construction of a functional load-monitoring insole, a pilot human study with orthopaedic trauma patients from the University of Utah (N=20) will be conducted to identify modes of device failure, improve device interfacing and develop data handling protocols and software for the clinical arm of the proposed study.

Specific Aim 2: Conduct a prospective, direct observational cohort study.

Thirty (30) open tibial fracture patients will be recruited at two centers: University of Utah (N=15) and William Beaumont Army Medical Center (N=15). Participants will wear a walking boot instrumented with the load-monitoring insole that will continuously record limb loading and serve as a step counter. X-rays collected at standard-of-care follow-up visits will be used by Drs. Kubiak and Orr to subjectively evaluate fracture healing. A questionnaire regarding subjective perception of patient compliance will be collected at the first and last follow-up visits. Data collected from the insole sensor will be correlated to objective measures of fracture healing and subjective measures of patient compliance to determine the effect of patient limb loading on injury outcome. The Hitchcock laboratory will develop software to process and summarize data from the load monitoring insole and continually improve human interfacing factors of the load monitoring insole based off of feedback from the clinical team and study participants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84108
        • University of Utah

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who present to the University of Utah with an Open Tibial Fractures.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Specific Aim 1 Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient has below the knee fracture
  • Patient speaks English
  • Patient weighs between 100 and 250 pounds
  • Patient lives in close enough proximity to the the hospital to return for all appointments (~100 miles)

Specific Aim 2 Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient is 18 years of age or older
  • Patient has a tibia fracture
  • Patient speaks English
  • Patient weighs between 100 and 250 pounds
  • Patient lives in close enough proximity to the the hospital to return for all appointments (~100 miles)

Exclusion Criteria:

Specific Aim 1 Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient is younger than 18 years of age
  • Patient does not have a below the knee fracture
  • Patient does not speak English
  • Patient weighs less than 100 pounds or more than 250 pounds
  • Patient does not live in close enough proximity to the hospital to return for all appointments (~100 miles)
  • Patient has another fracture that will alter his/her weight bearing status

Specific Aim 2 Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient is younger than 18 years of age
  • Patient does not have a tibia fracture
  • Patient does not speak English
  • Patient weighs less than 100 pounds or more than 250 pounds
  • Patient does not live in close enough proximity to the hospital to return for all appointments (~100 miles)
  • Patient has another fracture that will alter his/her weight bearing status

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Activity Measure (PAM-13) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Follow Up Visits up to 1-Year
A subjective evaluation of perceived compliance with physician instruction
Follow Up Visits up to 1-Year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
X-ray (AP and Lateral)
Time Frame: Follow Up Visits up to 1 Year
Subjectively evaluate fracture healing
Follow Up Visits up to 1 Year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Rothberg, MD, Orthopedic Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 24, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 58956

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Extremity Fractures

3
Subscribe