- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02197715
Sex and Female Empowerment (SAFE)
October 13, 2017 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Improving Women's Sexual Health While in Drug Addiction Treatment
This study will develop and initially evaluate Sex and Female Empowerment (SAFE), an intervention designed to increase acceptance of and adherence to contraceptive practices among opioid-agonist-maintained women of childbearing age.
The intervention will be delivered in one of two formats: a face-to-face brief intervention approach or a novel computer-adaptive platform.
To the extent that either version of SAFE is found to be efficacious compared with usual care, it has the potential to reduce the number of unintended pregnancies and consequently decrease the need for and the costs of child protective services.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
90
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
- UNC Horizons
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion criteria will be:
- ages 18-40 years old for women;
- able to provide informed consent;
- currently enrolled in a opioid-agonist-maintenance program;
- currently not pregnant (urine testing confirmation);
- report heterosexual orientation;
- no tubal ligation or other sterilization;
- no plans to become pregnant in the next 6 months; and
- provides verifiable locator information.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: computer-adaptive SAFE
Computer-adaptive SAFE will consist of 4 60-minute sessions.
Sessions 1 and 2 will explore participants' reasons to become and rewards for becoming pregnant/having children or avoiding it, introduce reproductive biology in the context of different contraceptive methods and explore the participant's ambivalence toward using different contraceptive methods.
Session 3 will provide in-depth coverage of contraceptive methods and the need for use of a barrier method.
Session 4 will focus on effective strategies to communicate with a sexual partner.
Computer-adaptive SAFE will use an audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) format.
|
|
|
Experimental: Face-to-face SAFE
Face-to-face SAFE will consist of 4 60-minute sessions using motivational interviewing techniques.
Each session will be led by an experienced counselor.
Sessions 1 and 2 will explore participants' reasons to become and rewards for becoming pregnant/having children or avoiding it, introduce reproductive biology in the context of different contraceptive methods and explore the participant's ambivalence toward using different contraceptive methods.
Session 3 will provide in-depth coverage of contraceptive methods and the need for use of a barrier method, and relevant skills regarding how to use and negotiate use of contraceptive methods.
Session 4 will focus on effective strategies to communicate with a sexual partner.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual care comprises four 60-minute provider-led individual care sessions about HIV, STIs, and their risks, as well as prevention methods.
Contraceptive methods are discussed within this context.
There will be no demand on participants to attend these sessions.
Participants will receive written take-home materials to review on their own and/or with their sex partners.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intervention Satisfaction
Time Frame: The earlier of the completion of the 4 interventions sessions or 6 weeks.
|
Summary scale score: Derived from responses to a four-item 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = "not at all help" to 5 = "extremely helpful") of satisfaction with the intervention, administered at the end of each of the four intervention sessions.
|
The earlier of the completion of the 4 interventions sessions or 6 weeks.
|
|
Contraceptive Consultation Appointment
Time Frame: The earlier of the completion of the 4 intervention sessions or 6 weeks.
|
Binary variable: Did or did not the participant schedule and attend an appointment with a obstetrical provider at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Obstetrical/Gynecological Services, determined from medical records.
|
The earlier of the completion of the 4 intervention sessions or 6 weeks.
|
|
Intervention Completion
Time Frame: The earlier of the completion of the 4 interventions sessions or 6 weeks.
|
Binary variable: Completes or fails to complete all four intervention sessions in a 6-week period, determined from study records.
|
The earlier of the completion of the 4 interventions sessions or 6 weeks.
|
|
Contraceptive Method Effectiveness
Time Frame: The earlier of the completion of the 4 intervention sessions or 6 weeks.
|
Percentage: The typical use effectiveness level of the contraceptive method in use at the end of the intervention based on responses to the National Survey of Family Growth contraceptive methods items.
If the participant does not make an appointment and choose a contraceptive method, the typical-use effectiveness level of the contraceptive method indicated at intake in response to the Survey of Family Growth contraceptive methods items will be used.
Typical effectiveness rating of contraceptive methods is a percentage between 15% and 99.85%, and will be based on Hatcher, R.A., Contraceptive technology, which reports success and failure rates for contraceptive methods in current use.
|
The earlier of the completion of the 4 intervention sessions or 6 weeks.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge of Reproduction
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
Summary scale score: Derived from eight true-false questions about participants' understanding of the information that was presented in the four intervention sessions about anatomy, menstruation, fertility, and conception, administered at each assessment time point.
|
Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Knowledge of Contraceptive Methods
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-months post-baseline
|
Summary scale score: Derived from twenty true-false questions about participants' understanding of the information presented in the four intervention sessions about contraceptive methods, how hormonal contraceptives work, how to correctly use them; hormonal contraceptive side effects and ways to deal with them; which methods are effective against STIs/HIV; correct condom use, administered at each assessment time point.
|
Baseline, 1-, 3-, 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Contraceptive Self-efficacy Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
Summary scale score: Derived from the Contraceptive Self-efficacy Scale, an eighteen-item 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = "not at all true of me" and 5 = "completely true of me") designed to measure a female respondent's motivational barriers to effective contraceptive use, including obtaining contraceptives, using contraceptives with a partner, talking to a partner about contraceptive use, using contraceptives despite partner approval, and preventing unprotected sexual intercourse, administered at each assessment time point.
|
Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Effective Contraceptive Behavior
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
Ordered polytomous variable: Participant's self-report of their contraceptive behavior obtained at each assessment time point will be classified into 1 of 4 patterns: (1) "uninterrupted effective user" (e.g., implant, injectable, an IUD); (2) "uninterrupted other user" (use of effective methods on an interrupted basis); (3) "sporadic user" (use of some method when at risk for pregnancy); or (4) "nonuser", where "uninterrupted" in (1) means that an effective method was used for the entire time period under assessment; otherwise, categorized as (2).
|
Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Frequency of Use of Barrier Protection in past 30 days
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
Count variable: Self-reported number of times in the past 30 days a participant used a barrier method for protection from HIV/STIs when engaging in sexual activities, collected at each assessment time point.
|
Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Number of Times Engaged in Unprotected Sex in past 30 days
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
Count variable: Self-reported number of times in the past 30 days a participant engaged in unprotected vaginal, oral, or anal sex, collected at each assessment time point.
|
Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-months post-baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Hendrée E Jones, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2014
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 21, 2014
First Posted (Estimate)
July 23, 2014
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 17, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 13, 2017
Last Verified
October 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13-3075
- R34DA033442 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Opioid Use Disorder
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesUniversity of Chicago; Rogers Behavioral Health; University of California Santa...RecruitingSubstance Use | Methamphetamine-dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid-use Disorder | Cocaine Use Disorder | Cocaine Use | Methamphetamine AbuseUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedSubstance Use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder | Heroin Use DisorderUnited States
-
Emory UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Georgia Institute of Technology; CUNYCompletedSubstance-Related Disorders | Substance Abuse, Intravenous | Substance Use Disorders | Opioid Use | Substance Abuse | Opioid-use Disorder | Opioid Use Disorder, Severe | Substance WithdrawalUnited States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompletedOpioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Center for Progressive Recovery, LLCNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Yale UniversityCompletedCriminal Behavior | Opioid Use Disorder, Moderate | Opioid Use Disorder, SevereUnited States
-
Albert Einstein College of MedicineNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Pfizer; National Institutes of Health...CompletedTobacco Use Disorder | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Indivior Inc.CompletedOpioid Use Disorder, Moderate | Opioid Use Disorder, SevereUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalOhio State UniversityActive, not recruitingOpioid Dependence | Opioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Indiana UniversityCompletedOpioid Use | Opioid-use DisorderUnited States
-
Virginia Commonwealth UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedOpioid-use Disorder | Cocaine Use Disorder | Healthy Controls | Marijuana Use DisorderUnited States
Clinical Trials on Usual Care
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | FatigueGermany
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyMammazentrum Hamburg am Krankenhaus Jerusalem, Germany; Dorit und Alexander...Completed
-
European Institute for Evidence Based Osteopathic...Unknown
-
Suzanna ZickUniversity of MichiganTerminatedQuality of Life | Fatigue | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic | Sleep | Pain, ChronicUnited States
-
Centers for Disease Control and PreventionCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedOsteoarthritis | Mindfulness | MBSRFrance
-
Gachon University Gil Oriental Medical HospitalKorea Health Industry Development InstituteCompletedKnee Replacement | AcupunctureKorea, Republic of
-
Mayo ClinicCompleted
-
The Miriam HospitalNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart FailureUnited States
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteUnknownDepression | Quality of Life | Sleep | Anxiety | Dry EyeCanada