Exercise Intervention for Cancer Survivors

January 26, 2017 updated by: Duke University

Exercise Outcome Expectations Among Breast Cancer Survivors

This randomized controlled trial will test a multicomponent intervention to increase exercise Outcome Expectations (OEs) and assess effects of OE changes on exercise intentions and levels of exercise. Sixty early stage breast cancer survivors will be recruited from the Duke Cancer Institute. Participants will be randomized to the exercise OE intervention or an attention control group. Both groups will receive the American Cancer Society diet and exercise guidelines and an accelerometer. The intervention group will also receive an OE workbook containing self-directed activities to increase OEs by focusing on OE importance (value placed on the outcome(s)), certainty (perceived probability outcome(s) will occur); and accessibility (frequency with which the outcome(s) are thought of). The attention control group will receive a workbook containing the same activities focused on diet, rather than exercise.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will test a theory-based intervention to increase levels of exercise among breast cancer survivors, in order to help them self-manage their long-term treatment side effects. The study focuses on outcome expectations (OEs), a significant yet understudied construct that is central to most behavior change theories. OEs refer to what people expect to obtain or avoid by engaging in a behavior; thus, people exercise because they believe it will produce desired outcomes. This randomized controlled trial will test a multicomponent intervention to increase exercise OEs and assess effects of OE changes on exercise intentions and levels of exercise. Sixty early stage (IA to IIB) inactive breast cancer survivors will be recruited from the Duke Cancer Institute. Participants will be randomized to the exercise OE intervention or an attention control group. Both groups will receive the American Cancer Society diet and exercise guidelines and an accelerometer. The intervention group will also receive an OE workbook containing self-directed activities to increase OEs by focusing on OE importance (value placed on the outcome(s)), certainty (perceived probability outcome(s) will occur); and accessibility (frequency with which the outcome(s) are thought of). The attention control group will receive a workbook containing the same activities focused on diet, rather than exercise. OE importance, OE certainty, OE accessibility, exercise intentions, exercise, and self-efficacy (a potential co-variate) will be assessed through online surveys at baseline, 4-, 8-, and 12-weeks post-intervention. At each time point, accelerometer data will be collected as an objective exercise measure. Specific aims of the study are to: (1) examine trajectories of OE importance, certainty and accessibility between participants in the OE intervention arm compared to participants in the attention control arm, across four time points: baseline, 4-, 8- and 12-weeks post-intervention; and (2) examine trajectories of exercise intentions and total weekly minutes of exercise, between participants in the OE intervention arm compared to participants in the attention control arm, across four time points: baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks post-intervention. If the intervention increases exercise among breast cancer survivors it may lead to improved survivorship duration and quality of life. The intervention can be implemented readily in clinic settings to support survivors to exercise more and thus experience better long-term outcomes. This study also provides a foundation for a developing a nurse scientist's program of research focused on designing theory-based exercise interventions for chronically ill populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. stage 1A - 2B breast cancer diagnosis;
  2. 2 months - 10 years status post surgery, radiation and chemotherapy;
  3. inactive (self-reported ≤ 150 min/wk moderate - strenuous-intensity exercise);
  4. no evidence of cancer recurrence;
  5. no pre-existing medical condition(s) that preclude adherence to an unsupervised exercise program (e.g., severe orthopedic conditions, scheduled hip or knee replacement within 6 months, paralysis and/or dementia, unstable angina, history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure);
  6. English-speaking and writing;
  7. access and ability to use a computer for completion of online measures; and
  8. possession of smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: exercise outcome expectation workbook
Intervention arm participants will receive: 1) the ACS exercise and diet guidelines; and 2) an exercise outcome expectation workbook. The workbook contains self-directed activities to increase OE importance, certainty, and accessibility. The workbook will aim to make participants aware of the breadth and depth of OEs by first providing a global overview of the many positive exercise outcomes breast cancer survivors may experience. Importance will be increased through elaboration of why outcomes are important to the participant; and certainty will be increased by narrative messages from other breast cancer survivors and an oncologist. Accessibility will be increased by having the participant think about the association between exercise and its outcomes.
The workbook will aim to make participants aware of the breadth and depth of OEs by first providing a global overview of the many and diverse positive outcomes breast cancer survivors may experience. Participants will then be asked to focus on the three OEs they would most like to experience. Each section of the OE guide contains activities to target specific OE dimensions. Importance will be increased through elaboration of why outcomes are important to the participant; and certainty will be increased by narrative messages from other breast cancer survivors and an oncologist. Accessibility will be increased by having the participant think about the association between exercise and its outcomes
Active Comparator: diet workbook
Attention control participants will receive via mail 1) the ACS exercise and diet guidelines; and 2) a diet workbook. The diet workbook contains the same activities as the exercise outcome expectation workbook but is focused on diet instead of exercise.
The workbook will contain the same activities as the intervention workbook but be focused on diet instead of exercise.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in OE importance, as measured by questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
change in OE accessibility, as measured by questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
change in OE certainty, as measured by questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
change in intentions to exercise, as measured by questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
change in total weekly minutes of exercise
Time Frame: baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention
baseline 4- 8- and 12-weeks post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

January 28, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2017

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Pro00059469

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Exercise OE workbook

Subscribe