Evaluation of RIBAvirin Plasma COncentrations in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Infection Routinely Treated With Modern DAA Regimens (RIBACOP)

December 4, 2020 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center
The aim of this study is to evaluate RBV plasma concentrations when used in combination with newly developed DAA combinations. If possible, its correlations with SVR rates and incidence of anaemia will be assessed in HCV-patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Ribavirin (RBV) is a synthetic guanosine analogue that is used to treat patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). For many years, RBV has been the cornerstone of the HCV treatment in combination with peg interferon (PEG-IFN). Since the development of direct-acting antivirals (DAA), PEG-IFN free treatment regimes became first choice of HCV treatment in the Netherlands. RBV still plays an important role in some of these regimens. The European Association for the Study of the liver (EASL) included RBV in PEG-IFN free regimens in combination with sofosbuvir, simeprevir and daclatasvir for HCV genotype (GT) 1, 3 and 4. Patients with predictors of poor response are candidates for DAA therapy combined with RBV, for instance prior null responders and/or patients with cirrhosis. For the treatment of genotype 2 (GT2) and 3 RBV is used in combination with sofosbuvir.

Chronic HCV infection is treated with combination therapy, therefore manufacturers developed combination tablets such as Gilead's Harvoni (ledipasvir + sofosbuvir) and Abbvie's 3D combination (paritaprevir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir and ritonavir). Possibly, RBV will be added to these regimes in the future when the patient is a prior null responder or suffering from cirrhosis.

As RBV is a guanine analogue it is not specific for HCV and some severe adverse effects are known. The most important adverse effect is haemolytic anaemia,which usually occurs during the first weeks of treatment (>10% of the treated patients, depending on co-medication). Other adverse reactions that were frequently reported were: neutropenia, anorexia, depression/insomnia, headache, dizziness, dyspnea, and cough 5.

In dual (PEG-IFN + RBV) HCV therapy RBV concentrations were associated with efficacy and toxicity. Also in former studies in HCV-infected patients treated with telaprevir (TVR) or boceprevir (BOC) in combination with PEG-IFN, the plasma concentration of RBV was associated with Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) and anaemia (defined as Hb<8,5 g/dL). We have tried to determine an optimal therapeutic range for RBV when combined with these DAAs. The plasma concentration of RBV at week 8 should be 2.2-5.3 mg/L in combination with TVR. 48% of the HCV patients in the cohort had these plasma concentrations of which 81% achieved SVR and 5.2% reported anaemia. In combination with BOC the plasma concentration should be 2.2-3.6 mg/L, 50% of patients had these concentrations. In this group 69% of patients achieved SVR and 46% anaemia. So, for these therapies, therapeutic ranges for RBV could be defined for the optimal SVR rates and the lowest incidence of anaemia 6, 7.

As TVR and BOC have now been replaced by novel DAAs, we would like to investigate this described relationship between RBV concentrations, SVR and anaemia also with the newer DAAs that were licensed in the last year (simeprevir and sofosbuvir) and that are going to be available in 2015 in The Netherlands (daclatasvir, Harvoni, Abbvie 3D combo).

The aim of this study is to evaluate RBV plasma concentrations when used in combination with newly developed DAA combinations. If possible, its correlations with SVR rates and incidence of anaemia will be assessed in HCV-patients.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

252

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
        • Radboud University Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

chronicHCV infected patients treated with direct acting antivirals (daclatasvir, simeprevir, sofosbuvir, paritaprevir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir, ledipasvir) and ribavirin.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HCV-infected patients
  • Patient must be treated with ribavirin. The dosage of ribavirin may vary, as the different centers have different protocols for RBV dosing.
  • Patient must be treated with one or more DAAs (simeprevir, sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, ledipasvir, paritaprevir, ombitasvir, or dasabuvir).
  • At least 18 years of age at start of treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
HCV patients
HCV patients treated with direct acting antivirals and ribavirin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ribavirin concentration
Time Frame: Ribavirin concentraition at week 8 of treatment
Analysis ribavirin concentration in plasma
Ribavirin concentraition at week 8 of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sustained virological response (SVR12)
Time Frame: Change from baseline virological resonse, 12 weeks after treatment.
HCV RNA analysis in plasma
Change from baseline virological resonse, 12 weeks after treatment.
Hemoglobin concentrations
Time Frame: Change from baseline hemoglobin concentrationes, 8 weeks after treatment.
Analysis Hb plasma concentration
Change from baseline hemoglobin concentrationes, 8 weeks after treatment.
Ribavirin concentration
Time Frame: Ribavirin concentraition at week 2 of treatment
Analysis ribavirin concentrations in plasma
Ribavirin concentraition at week 2 of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: David Burder, PharmdD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 21, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

July 22, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Subscribe