Local Radiotherapy Following Complete Resection of a Brain Metastasis

May 17, 2019 updated by: Anna Bruynzeel, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Postoperative Local Stereotactic Radiotherapy Versus Observation Following a Complete Resection of a Single Brain Metastasis

Objective: To improve local control following complete resection of a single brain metastasis using fractionated local stereotactic radiotherapy, whilst maintaining neurological functioning, neurocognition and quality of life.

Study design: Multicenter randomized phase III, with at least three high-volume Dutch centers participating in the trial. Stratification on primary tumor type and age.

Study population: Patients undergoing complete resection of a single brain metastasis, confirmed by an early (i.e. within 72 hours) postoperative contrast-enhanced MR scan.

Study intervention: Patients will be randomized between observation alone (standard arm) and local stereotactic radiotherapy in three fractions of 8 Gy to the surgical cavity (study arm).

Main study parameters: Primary objective: local control rate at 6 months. Secondary objectives: local control rate at 12 months, neurological functioning, freedom from clinical neurological progression, performance status, quality of life, toxicity, steroid use, neurocognition and overall survival.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to improve local control following complete resection of a single brain metastasis of solid tumors using fractionated local stereotactic radiotherapy, whilst maintaining neurological functioning, neurocognition and quality of life. The study is performed in the form of a multicenter randomized phase III, with at least three high-volume Dutch centers participating in the trial. Stratification will be performed on primary tumor type and age. A total of 70 patients will be included. Inclusion is restricted to patients who underwent a complete resection of a single brain metastasis, confirmed by an early (i.e. within 72 hours) postoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) scan. Patients will be randomized between observation alone (standard arm) and local stereotactic radiotherapy in three fractions of 8 Gy to the surgical cavity (study arm).The main study parameters are: local control rate at 6 months (primary outcome measure) and local control rate at 12 months, neurological functioning, freedom from clinical neurological progression, performance status, quality of life, toxicity, steroid use, neurocognition and overall survival (secondary outcome measures). Follow up will be performed at three-monthly interval during the first two years, including MRI scans. Quality of life questionaires and neurocognitive functioning tests will be performed at fixed intervals during follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066CX
        • Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1081HV
        • VU University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age of 18 years or older.
  • Radiologically confirmed complete resection of a single brain metastasis on a contrast-enhanced MRI within 72 h after resection.
  • Primary solid tumor, excluding hematologic malignancy, germ cell tumor, small cell lung cancer.
  • Stable extracranial tumor (primary tumor and/or systemic metastases) during the last three months with or without treatment or progressive extracranial tumor and/or systemic metastases for which effective treatment is available.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) performance score 0-2.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment for brain metastases (i.e. surgery, stereotactic radiotherapy or WBRT).
  • Distant brain metastases or radiological findings on MRI suspected for leptomeningeal tumor spread on the postoperative MRI.
  • Concurrent use of systemic therapy during local stereotactic radiotherapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: observation
Watchful waiting
Active Comparator: local stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)
local SRT in three fractions of 8 Gy to the surgical cavity
local stereotactic radiotherapy in three fractions of 8 Gy to the surgical cavity
Other Names:
  • stereotactic radiotherapy
  • radiosurgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
local control rate
Time Frame: at 6 months
as assessed on follow-up MRI scans
at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Decrease in neurocognitive test results using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R), in full cohorts
Time Frame: baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Neurocognitive testing will be performed at baseline, at three, six and twelve months follow-up using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R). The HVLT-R is one of the components used to form the core set of cognitive tests recommended to use in oncology trials. This test measures immediate memory span, provides a learning curve, measures both short-term and longer-term retention, and allows for a comparison between retrieval efficiency and learning. This version includes 3 learning trials of a 12-word list, an interval of 20 minutes a delayed recall, and a recognition trial consisting of the target words interspersed with distractor words. The score on the recognition trial is the total number of correct response. This measure has adequate psychometric properties and 6 multiple forms.
baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Decrease in specified neurocognitive test results using the Trail Making A and B, in full cohorts
Time Frame: baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Neurocognitive testing will be performed at baseline, at three, six and twelve months follow-up using the Trail Making A and B. This test is one of the components used to form the core set of cognitive tests recommended to use in oncology trials. This is a test of visual conceptual and visuomotor tracking. It measures psychomotor speed and aspects of executive function. It is given in two parts, A and B. The subject must first draw lines to connect consecutively numbered circles on one work sheet (part A) and then connect the same number of consecutively numbered and lettered circles on another worksheet by alternating between the two sequences (part B). The subject is urged to connect the circles as fast as possible
baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Decrease in neurocognitive test results using the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA), in full cohorts
Time Frame: baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Neurocognitive testing will be performed at baseline, at three, six and twelve months follow-up using the Controlled Oral Word Association (COWA). The COWA is one of the components used to form the core set of cognitive tests recommended to use in oncology trials. This test measures speeded verbal fluency and aspects of executive function. In this test, subjects are asked to generate as many words as possible in 1 minute beginning with "B", "D," and "H". It has two forms.
baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Decrease in neurocognitive test results using using the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) III Digit Span and WAIS III Digit Symbol, in full cohorts
Time Frame: baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Neurocognitive testing will be performed at baseline, at three, six and twelve months follow-up using the WAIS III Digit Span and WAIS III Digit Symbol. These added cognitive tests are also chosen based on their proven sensitivity to measure change in neuro-oncology patients. The subtest of the WAIS-III (Digit Span) involves forward and backward repetitions of series of digits and provides measures of concentration. This measure has adequate psychometric properties.

The subtest of the WAIS III (Digit Symbol) involves a symbol substitution task that requires visual-motor coordination, motor persistence, and sustained attention. The test is used as a test for information processing speed. The task consists of pairing numbers to nonsense symbols as quickly as possible.

baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Decrease in neurocognitive test results using the Grooved Pegboard, in full cohorts
Time Frame: baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months
Neurocognitive testing will be performed at baseline, at three, six and twelve months follow-up using the Grooved Pegboard. This added cognitive test is also chosen based on its proven sensitivity to measure change in neuro-oncology patients. This test measures motor speed and dexterity and is an adjusted version of the Purdue Pegboard test. The test consists out of plywood with 2 columns of 30 holes and a zinced bowl filled with metal pegs above each column. Subjects are offered one minute to put as many pegs as possible into the holes. The test has two different trials: dominant hand only and non-dominant hand only.
baseline, at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

April 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on local SRT

3
Subscribe