- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02741310
Study to Evaluate the Effect of Erenumab on Blood Pressure When Given Concomitantly With Subcutaneous Sumatriptan
Phase 1, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Single-Dose Study to Evaluate the Effect on Blood Pressure of AMG 334 Given Concomitantly With Subcutaneous Sumatriptan (Imitrex™) in Healthy Subjects
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy male and female subjects ≥ 18 to ≤ 55 years old
- Good general health
- Laboratory results within range
- Other Inclusion Criteria May Apply
Exclusion Criteria:
- Female subjects pregnant or breastfeeding
- An unstable medical condition
- History of cancer
- Active liver disease
- Positive Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C
- Unwilling or unable to limit alcohol consumption
- Unable to refrain from strenuous exercise
- Other Exclusion Criteria May Apply
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants received a placebo intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 then 12 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan on day 2 (Part 1).
After a 2-day washout participants received another placebo IV infusion on day 4 followed by 12 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan on day 5 (Part 2).
|
Administered by intravenous infusion
Administered by two 6 mg subcutaneous injections 1 hour apart on day 2 and day 5
Other Names:
|
Experimental: Erenumab
Participants received a placebo intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 then 12 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan on day 2 (Part 1).
After a 2-day washout participants received 140 mg erenumab IV infusion on day 4 followed by 12 mg subcutaneous sumatriptan on day 5 (Part 2).
|
Administered by intravenous infusion
Administered by two 6 mg subcutaneous injections 1 hour apart on day 2 and day 5
Other Names:
Administered by intravenous infusion
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time-weighted Averages of Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: Days 2 and 5 from predose to 2.5 hours after sumatriptan dosing.
|
Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is the average arterial pressure during a single cardiac cycle. MAP was calculated as diastolic blood pressure (DBP) + 0.33 * (systolic blood pressure [SBP]-DBP). Individual time-weighted average in MAP were calculated as area under the measurement-time curve from predose through 2.5 hours of MAP divided by the time period over which the measurements were made (ie, AUCmap0-2.5 hr /2.5 hours). Data were analyzed using a linear mixed effects regression model with fixed effects for treatment and period and random effect for subject; Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only). |
Days 2 and 5 from predose to 2.5 hours after sumatriptan dosing.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: From the first dose of study drug (sumatriptan, placebo or erenumab) until 84 days after the last dose (89 days). Part 1 includes AEs from day 1 to predose on day 4 and Part 2 includes AEs from day 4 through day 89.
|
Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and according to the following: Grade 1 = Mild AE, asymptomatic or mild symptoms; Grade 2 = Moderate, minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; Grade 3 = Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4 = Life-threatening consequences, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5 = Death related to AE. |
From the first dose of study drug (sumatriptan, placebo or erenumab) until 84 days after the last dose (89 days). Part 1 includes AEs from day 1 to predose on day 4 and Part 2 includes AEs from day 4 through day 89.
|
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to 6 Hours for Sumatriptan
Time Frame: Day 2 and day 5 at 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.
|
Plasma concentrations of sumatriptan were quantified using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 6 hours post dose (AUC6hr) after the 2nd 6 mg dose of sumatriptan was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ; 0.100 ng/mL) were set to 0 before data analysis. Log-transformed AUC6hr was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect. Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only). |
Day 2 and day 5 at 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.
|
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity for Sumatriptan
Time Frame: Day 2 and day 5 at 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.
|
Plasma concentrations of sumatriptan were quantified using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) after the 2nd 6 mg dose of sumatriptan was estimated as the sum of AUClast and Clast/λz where Clast is the last observed concentration and λz is the first-order terminal rate constant estimated via linear regression of the terminal log-linear decay phase. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.100 ng/mL) were set to 0 before data analysis. Log-transformed AUCinf was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect. Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only). |
Day 2 and day 5 at 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.
|
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Sumatriptan
Time Frame: Day 2 and day 5 at predose, 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.
|
Plasma concentrations of sumatriptan were quantified using a validated high performance liquid chromatographic method with tandem mass spectrometry detection. Sumatriptan plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) (0.100 ng/mL) were set to 0 before data analysis. Log-transformed maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with treatment as a fixed effect and subject as a random effect. Sumatriptan Alone data include participants from both Groups A (Parts 1 and 2) and B (Part 1 only). |
Day 2 and day 5 at predose, 1 hour (prior to 2nd sumatriptan injection), 1 hour 10 minutes, 1.25, 1.5, 2, 3, 4.5, and 7 hours relative to the first 6 mg dose of sumatriptan.
|
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies
Time Frame: Baseline and day 89
|
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. All samples were first tested in an electrochemiluminescence-based bridging assay to detect antibodies capable of binding to erenumab (Binding Antibody Assay). Samples confirmed to be positive for binding antibodies were subsequently tested in a cell-based assay to determine neutralizing activity against erenumab (Neutralizing Antibody Assay). If a post-dose sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the sample was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies. Binding/neutralizing antibody positive is defined as participants with an antibody positive postbaseline results and with a negative or no result at baseline. |
Baseline and day 89
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Serotonin Agents
- Serotonin 5-HT1 Receptor Agonists
- Serotonin Receptor Agonists
- Vasoconstrictor Agents
- Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists
- Erenumab
- Sumatriptan
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20140255
- 2015-004537-28 (EudraCT Number)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy Subjects
-
BiogenCompletedHealthy Adult Subjects | Healthy Elderly SubjectsUnited States
-
PfizerCompletedHealthy Adult Subjects and Healthy Elderly SubjectsBelgium
-
PfizerRecruitingHealthy Subjects | Healthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)CompletedHealthy | Healthy Subjects | ImmunosuppressionUnited States
-
Lund UniversityCompletedHealthy Subjects | Diet, HealthySweden
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterCompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy AdultsNetherlands
-
Shouyao Holdings (Beijing) Co. LTDNot yet recruiting
-
Abbisko Therapeutics Co, LtdNot yet recruiting
-
Vigonvita Life SciencesNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on Placebo
-
SamA Pharmaceutical Co., LtdUnknownAcute Bronchitis | Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionKorea, Republic of
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCannabis UseUnited States
-
AstraZenecaParexel; Spandauer Damm 130; 14050; Berlin, GermanyCompletedMale Subjects With Type II Diabetes (T2DM)Germany
-
Heptares Therapeutics LimitedCompletedPharmacokinetics | Safety IssuesUnited Kingdom
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveUnited Kingdom, Netherlands
-
ItalfarmacoCompletedBecker Muscular DystrophyNetherlands, Italy
-
Shijiazhuang Yiling Pharmaceutical Co. LtdXuanwu Hospital, BeijingCompleted
-
GlaxoSmithKlineCompletedInfections, BacterialUnited States
-
West Penn Allegheny Health SystemCompletedAsthma | Allergic RhinitisUnited States