A Study of Neurostyle Brain Exercise Therapy Towards Enhanced Recovery (nBETTER) for Stroke (nBETTER)

February 25, 2018 updated by: Tan Tock Seng Hospital

A Pilot Feasibility Clinical Trial of Neurostyle Brain Exercise Therapy Towards Enhanced Recovery (nBETTER) for postStroke Arm Paresis

A feasibility trial of Neurostyle Brain Exercise Therapy Towards Enhanced Recovery (nBETTER) system for Brain Computer Interface (BCI) neurofeedback for rehabilitation of the subacute and chronic hemiplegic upper limb aimed at improving upper limb recovery for subacute to chronic stroke patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Stroke remains the 4th cause of death in Singapore and despite advances in neuro-medical care and rehabilitation, 40-50% of stroke survivors are left with permanent neuro-disability and a reduced quality of life. The previous 2 decades has seen exponential leaps in the development of rehabilitation technologies which enhance neuroplasticity and rehabilitation outcome. One of these potentially useful technologies is nBETTER System, was developed by Institute for Infocomm Research, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR). nBETTER is a portable, internet-connected device that detects the imagination of movement of stroke-affected limb using a Electroencephalography (EEG)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) thus delivering visually engaging feedback for directed neurofeedback aimed at improving upper limb recovery for subacute to chronic stroke patients. The pilot study aims to recruit 13 patients using a multi centre trial design to investigate nBETTER system feasibility and safety for rehabilitation of subacute to chronic stroke patients with upper limb motor impairment and to determine clinical efficacy, safety and feasibility of such a system when it is delivered with standard occupational therapy.

The investigators primary hypothesis is that nBETTER is a feasible and safe prototype in stroke survivors (> 3 months) with moderate to severe arm impairment (FMMA 10-50). The primary outcome is a gain of 15% in Fugl-Meyer motor scores at 6 weeks after 18 sessions (total of 27 hours) of supervised training by occupational therapists and bioengineers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 308433
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 21-80 years with first-ever clinical stroke diagnosed on CT or MRI brain imaging.
  2. Stroke duration of 3-24 months.
  3. Stroke type: ischemic or haemorrhagic
  4. Fugl-Meyer motor score of the upper limb range from 10-50
  5. Ability to pay attention and maintain supported sitting for 1.5 hours continuously
  6. Able to give own consent and understand simple instructions
  7. Fulfils BCI resting brain states on initial screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Recurrent clinical stroke
  2. Functional status: severe aphasia or inattention, unstable medical conditions which may affect participation (e.g. unresolved sepsis, postural hypotension, end stage renal failure) or anticipated life expectancy of <1 year due to malignancy or neurodegenerative disorder)
  3. Hemispatial neglect (visual or sensory) or severe visual impairment despite visual aids
  4. History of epilepsy, severe depression or active psychiatric disorder
  5. Skull defect or previous cranial surgery as this would affect physical fit of EEG cap interface
  6. Local arm factors: severe spasticity Modified Ashworth scale >2 in any region, visual analogue scale (VAS score) >4/10, fixed joint contractures or joint replacements, patients with poor skin conditions which would contraindicate repetitive arm training.
  7. TMS contraindications: females with reproductive potential not on reliable contraception; pregnancy; cardiac pacemakers; orthodontics (braces); metal implants.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: nBETTER and Conventional Therapy
Intervention: nBetter therapy
60 minutes of nBETTER training followed by 30 minutes of conventional therapy occupational therapy. Total of 18 sessions over 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Upper extremity Fugl-Meyer motor score post training
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
As above
Baseline and week 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Assessment (TMS)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
As above
Baseline and week 6
Change in Grip Strength
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Grip Strength measures hand force in kgf
Baseline and week 6
Change in Frenchay Arm Test of Function (FAT)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6

Frenchay Arm Test of Function (FAT) measures 5 tasks:

  • Stabilize ruler and draw line
  • Grasp and lift cylinder without dropping
  • Pick up half glass and drink
  • Replace sprung clothes peg
  • Comb hair from top down (sides and back of head)
Baseline and week 6
Change in Modified Ashworth Scale score (MAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Modified Ashworth Scale score (MAS) measure spasticity of wrist and hand finger flexors on a scale from 0 to 4
Baseline and week 6
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 6
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain on a scale from 0 to 10
Baseline and week 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen S Chua, MBBS, FRCP, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 28, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 16, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

May 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Subscribe