Effect of Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation Versus Needle Irrigation on Postoperative Pain and Periapical Healing

February 7, 2017 updated by: Noha Tawfik aly, Cairo University

Comparison of Postoperative Pain and Healing After Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation and Needle Irrigation in Patients With Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation versus needle irrigation on post-operative pain and healing in patients with permanent posterior teeth with apical periodontitis treated in a single visit.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Full medical and dental history using a dental chart for all patients treated in this study.

Clinical and radiographic examination will be done for all patients to verify the diagnosis of apical periodontitis with periapical radiolucency at least 2mm in diameter.

The treatment protocol and its associated risks and benefits will be explained to the eligible patients before obtaining informed consent. Endodontic procedures will be done in a single visit as follows: access cavity preparation using sterile round bur and Endo-Z bur, isolation using a rubber dam, canal preparation using a nickel-titanium rotary system then obturation. During mechanical preparation, irrigation will be done using passive ultrasonic irrigation (Experimental group) where ultrasonic activation will be done for irrigant-filled canals using the U- file tip (Varios NSK) in an ultrasonic device (P5 Newtron; Satelec Acteon) 1mm from the working length after each file change for 10 sec, or needle irrigation (Control group) where only the endodontic irrigation needle will be used; the irrigation protocol for each patient will be determined following a random-number sequence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18-55 years old.
  • Males and females.
  • Positive patient's acceptance to participate in the study.
  • Mature, permanent, mandibular, posterior teeth with apical periodontitis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medically compromised patients so that no other pain source or drug interaction could interfere with pain resulting from the endodontic therapy.
  • Patients who had received analgesic treatment recently (past 8 hours) as it can affect the results
  • Pregnant females.
  • Teeth with previous root canal treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Needle irrigation
Endodontic irrigation will be done using an endodontic needle.
Endodontic irrigation
EXPERIMENTAL: Passive ultrasonic irrigation
Endodontic passive ultrasonic irrigation will be done using an endodontic needle followed by passive ultrasonic agitation.
Endodontic irrigation followed by passive ultrasonic agitation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: 7 days
postoperative pain will be assessed using numerical rate scale (NRS).
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Periapical healing
Time Frame: 12 months
Periapical healing will be assessed using periapical index (PAI).
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Randa El-Bogdady, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: Suzan AW Amin, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe