Optimal Volume, Rate, and Interval of Bolus Nerve Catheters for Shoulder Surgery

November 8, 2019 updated by: Duke University

Up-down Sequential Allocation Study to Determine the Optimal Volume, Rate, and Interval of Bolus of Ropivacaine 0.2% in Interscalene Continuous Nerve Catheters for Shoulder Surgery

The purpose of this study is to determine the ideal delivery of local anesthetics for pain control when using continuous interscalene peripheral nerve catheters for shoulder surgery.

The study will be conducted in three stages. In the first stage the ideal bolus volume of ropivacaine will be determined. In the second stage the optimal rate of delivery of the bolus (infusion rate) will be determined. Finally, once both the ideal volume and infusion rate has been determined, the optimal interval between boluses of local anesthetic will be determined.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine the ideal delivery of local anesthetics for postoperative analgesia when using continuous interscalene peripheral nerve catheters for shoulder surgery. New technology has emerged with electronic pumps that permit intermittent mandatory boluses of local anesthetic to be delivered in addition to continuous infusions. The pump would automatically deliver a bolus at a given interval, but would otherwise be idle for a period of time. This technology could improve the efficacy of local anesthetics, and thereby improve postoperative analgesia.

Continuous peripheral nerve catheters have been shown to improve pain control in several orthopedic surgical procedures when compared to opioids. However, it is not uncommon for patients to experience breakthrough pain in spite of a functional peripheral nerve block. Many times, this breakthrough pain can be managed with a bolus of local anesthetic administered by an anesthesia provider. Until recently, the vast majority of peripheral nerve catheter infusion pumps have only had the capability of providing a constant rate of local anesthetic administration. Newer technology allows for infusion pumps to deliver intermittent mandatory boluses of local anesthetic. This technique of local anesthetic administration has previously been evaluated with popliteal nerve blocks, but to our knowledge has never been evaluated for use with interscalene nerve catheters.

Currently, data would support the idea that a bolus of local anesthetic can improve analgesia with decreased side effects compared to a continuous infusion. However, there is little data evaluating the optimal volume of bolus, the optimal speed of delivery, or the optimal interval between local anesthetic boluses.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke Ambulatory Surgery Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, ≥18 years of age
  • Patients scheduled to undergo unilateral shoulder surgery at Duke University Medical Center, including arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, acromioplasty, hemiarthroplasty, and total shoulder replacement.
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) Physical Class 1-3.
  • BMI ≤40 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a contraindication to placement of interscalene nerve block. This includes abnormal clotting, skin infection involving the neck, the presence of neurological disorders or cervical spine disease, contralateral phrenic nerve dysfunction, or moderate-severe COPD (FEV1<80% of normal values and/or FEV1/FVC < 0.70)
  • Patients with chronic pain (pain existing for longer than 6 months), or taking chronic opioids (greater than 60 morphine equivalents per day) at time of surgery
  • Contraindications to or known drug interactions with local anesthetics
  • Patients who will be discharged home directly from PACU
  • Planned administration of another investigational product or procedure during the subject's participation in this study.
  • Patients who do not have the capacity to give legally effective consent
  • Suspected, or known addiction to or abuse of illicit drug(s), prescription medicine(s), or alcohol within the past 2 years.
  • Uncontrolled anxiety, schizophrenia, or other psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may interfere with study assessments or compliance.
  • Current or historical evidence of any clinically significant disease or condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may increase the risk of surgery or complicate the subject's postoperative course.
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Volume of bolus
Ropivacaine 0.2% volume increased or decreased by 1ml based on previous patient experience. If pain greater than or equal to 5/10 in the previous patient, the current patient will receive an increase in volume of bolus by 1ml. If pain is less than 5/10 in the previous patient the current patient will receive a decrease in volume by 1ml.
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Experimental: Rate of delivery of bolus
Ropivacaine 0.2% rate increased or decreased by 50ml/hr based on previous patient experience. If pain greater than or equal to 5/10 in the previous patient at 30 minutes, the current patient will receive an increase in rate of bolus by 50ml/hr. If the pain is less than 5/10 the rate will be decreased by 50ml/hr.
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Other Names:
  • Naropin
Experimental: Interval between bolus
Ropivacaine 0.2% interval increased or decreased by 1 hour based on previous patient experience. If the previous patient received pain score of 2/10 at 2 hours then the current patient will have an interval of three hours. If the pain is greater than 2/10, the interval will be shortened by 1 hour.
Change in administration of ropivacaine. Rate, Volume and Interval of bolus altered.
Other Names:
  • Naropin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal Volume of Ropivacaine 0.2% bolus via interscalene catheter
Time Frame: 1 day
Up-down sequential allocation alteration of volume to determine optimal volume of bolus
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal Rate of Ropivacaine 0.2% administration bolus via interscalene cathter
Time Frame: 1 day
Up-down sequential allocation alteration of rate to determine optimal rate of bolus
1 day

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Optimal Interval of Ropivacaine 0.2% administration of bolus via interscalene catheter
Time Frame: 1 day
Up-down sequential allocation alteration of interval to determine optimal interval of bolus
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joshua R Dooley, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

February 21, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 8, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe