Maxillary 3-implant Removable Prostheses Without Palatal Coverage on Locator Abutments

May 15, 2019 updated by: University of Tromso

Maxillary 3-implant Removable Prostheses Without Palatal Coverage on Locator Abutments - a Prospective Cohort Study

The aims of this clinical study conducted at a dental specialty clinic in Drammen, Norway are to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with an edentate upper jaw having been treated with a removable full prosthesis supported by 3 implants to restore function and aesthetics. Clinical variables beyond implant dimensions and intraoral location, such as recall routines, maintenance needs, patient satisfaction and quality of life, will also be appraised and contrasted with an aim to elucidate their association with clinical outcomes. Specific evaluation will be done with regard to the following outcome criteria:

  • crestal bone levels and periodontal conditions around implants
  • incidence rates of biological, technical, traumatic failures / complications related to implants
  • incidence rates of biological, technical, mechanical, esthetic failures/complications with prosthesis and prosthetic components A secondary objective is to identify the different risk factors for biological failures / complications, including the influence of medical conditions and tobacco use.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Materials and Methods The protocol is submitted to the Research Ethics Board of the Northern Norway in order to obtain ethics approval prior to commencing the study. All patients will obtain an invitation letter detailing the objectives of the study and requested to sign a consent letter prior to clinical examinations according to principles for good research practice. All patients will be offered a free implant hygiene session and prosthesis cleaning.

Study population All patients treated in a private dental clinic in Drammen, Norway having received a maxillary removable full prosthesis supported on 3 dental implants will be invited to attend evaluations of their intra-oral status annually after implant installation and solicited about treatment satisfaction and daily oral functions. These patients were initially not offered maintenance care at the completion of their treatment.

The implants that have been used are made from titanium with a microrough surface (Astra Tech Implant System, Dentsply Implants, Mølndal, Sweden). All implants have been placed according to the manufacturer's instructions (http://www.dentsplyimplants.no/nb-NO/Implantatsystem/Prosedyrer/Treatment-planning) and fitted with precision attachments (Locator, ZEST Anchors, Escondido, CA, USA. The removable prostheses were made from heat cured poly-methyl-metacrylate (PMMA) incorporating three active matrices).

Recall Procedure Each patient will be invited by letter followed up by a phone call to attend an examination visit. The patients will complete a questionnaire related to changes in general health aspects, their experiences and satisfaction with the reconstructions and eventual need for repair sessions during the last year. Specifically, the medical history and the smoking history (e.g. pack/years) will be assessed. Recordings will be made of general and local factors which may affect the prognosis of the implants and prosthesis. This includes the occurrence of systemic disease since implant placement, regular medication used by patients, smoking status, dental treatment received since implant placement, recall frequency at the dental hygienist and the last dental examination appointment.

Collection of Data from Patients' Charts

General information will be gathered from the patients' charts. Patients' age, self-reported smoking habits and the number of cigarettes per day, medical history, medication intake, reason for tooth loss and the date of prosthesis insertion will be recorded in "patient's summary forms". Type and distribution of implants will be retrieved from patients' charts. Cases with a chart documentation of an incidence of biological or mechanical complications during the follow-up period will be closely reviewed and recorded as following:

  1. History of implant loss (Biological complication):

    Period of service before failure is traced in months for each lost implant. Lost implants will be categorized in three groups: 1) "Early Failure" which refers to implants lost before the insertion of the definite prosthesis. 2) "One-year Failure" addressing implants failed within the first year of loading. 3) "Late Failure" including implants lost more than one year following the insertion of the final prosthesis (Roos-Jansåker et al 2006).

  2. History of peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis (biological complication):

    Any recorded incidence of inflammation and suppuration related to the gingival tissue surrounding implants in patients' charts will be gathered and transferred to "patients' summary forms".

  3. History of various technical problems encountered following the insertion of the removable prosthesis (mechanical complications):

Any history of mechanical complications such as attachment loosening/fracture and incidences of cracks, chippings and fractures in resin teeth, acrylic body and prosthesis will be recorded in "patients' summary forms".

Post-operation peri-apical radiographs, taken at the day of "stage-one" surgery, will be retrieved from patient's charts and used as the reference point of supporting bone level for each implant. Reference bone levels on mesial and distal sides are determined by measuring the distance between implant platform and the most apical point of the alveolar crestal bone surrounding implant. A mean value between the mesial and distal sides is used for each implant as the reference marginal bone level.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Drammen, Norway, 3044
        • Tannlege Arild Mo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients treated in a private dental clinic in Drammen, Norway

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Edentulous maxilla Competence to sign the informed consent form describing the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Lack of jaw bone for the placement of dental implants without the need for bone regeneration.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intra-oral status
Time Frame: 3 years
The radiographic examination will comprise periapical radiographs or an orthopantomogram. The clinical examination include a basic periodontal examination with the use of an UNC-15 (University of North Carolina) manual periodontal probe. Outcomes measured will be presence or absence of peri-implant suppuration or fistula, the modified plaque and sulcus bleeding indices) and the probing depths.
3 years
Condition of prosthesis and implants
Time Frame: 3 years
The removable prosthesis will be examined for any technical flaws. Adverse technical events include loss of retention, or fracture and/or chipping of the removable prosthesis. Adverse mechanical events include loosening of the male attachment or fracture of an implant. The stability of all implants will be assessed, and any sign of mobility along with pain and discomfort will be interpreted as a definitive sign of implant failure.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implant bone level changes
Time Frame: 3 years
Reference bone levels on the mesial and distal sides will be measured relative to baseline measurements made at the time of delivery of denture
3 years
Patient-reported satisfaction outcome
Time Frame: 5 years
A self-reported Denture Satisfaction Scale questionnaire (Allen et al. 2001).
5 years
Patient-reported quality of life outcome
Time Frame: 5 years
The short form version of the Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire (OHIP-20) (Allen & Locker 2002).
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Asbjørn Jokstad, DDS, PhD, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2019

Last Verified

April 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REK 2013/1446

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Maxilla

Clinical Trials on Denture supported by 3 dental implants

Subscribe