- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03055715
Prognostic Evaluation of Tumor Volume and Its Changes in Radical Radiotherapy of Advanced NSCLC
Multicentric Retrospective Prognostic Evaluation of Tumor Volume and Their Change in the Curative-intended, Radical Radiotherapy of Locally Advanced NSCLC
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
The prognostic relevance of the 'gross tumor volume' (GTV) in radiotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in stage III is adressed in a limited number of studies in the literature. The review article by Dubben et al., that comprises data until 1998, highlights the GTV as an important indicator and influencing factor for the therapeutic success after radiotherapy, albeit not being dominant over the T-stage (Dubben et al. 1988). In general, an increase in tumor volume correlates with a higher T-stage (Martel et al. 1997), but no congruence can neccessarily be assumed between the tumor volume and the T-determinator. Since the TNM-classification is primarily surgical however, it also does not provide sufficient information for prognosis when surgical therapy is not the first choice.
Available evidence suggests that the GTV in particular at the beginning of therapy acts as a statistically significant prognostic indicator regarding overall survival and / or local tumor control (Martel et al. 1997; Bradley et al. 2002; Basaki et al. 2006; Etiz et al. 2002; Werner-Wasik et al. 2001; Wer-ner-Wasik et al. 2008; Stinchcombe et al. 2006; Dehing-Oberije et al. 2008; Willner et al. 2002; Ball et al. 2013). A direct comparison between different studies is, however, often hampered due to the large variation of measurement time points during therapy, as well as the employed definition of the tumor volume. For example, all studies include patients whose GTV was determined after (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy. In addition, three studies even combine the tumor volume of the primary tumor with affected lymph nodes (Etiz et al. 2002; Werner-Wasik et al. 2008; Dehing-Oberije et al. 2008). Furthermore, no agreements can be found in the literature concerning volume changes during therapy. Nonetheless, all studies report a volume reduction at the end of therapy, albeit not always significant. In a study containing 10 patients treated with helical Tomotherapy, the authors observed a relative median tumor reduction during therapy of 1.2% per day (0.6-2.3%) (Kupelian et al. 2005).
The response of NSCLC to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy is slow (Woodford et al. 2007) with tumors reaching their maximum response or minimal volume after 5-11 months after exposure (Werner-Wasik et al. 2001). If the tumor volume is determined too early, i.e. directly after the end of therapy, the results can lead to misinterpretation resulting in an overestimation of the tumor volume or correspondingly an underestimation of the therapeutic response (Siker et al. 2006). According to Bell et al., the predictive value of tumor volume changes in the first 18 months after radiotherapy is of particular importance. During this time, a significantly increased mortality was observed for larger tumor volumes.
Incorporation of a PET/CT in the context of the radiaton plan is advantageous with respect to the precise traget-volume definition and sparing of risk organs (Ruysscher et al. 2005; Nestle et al. 2006; Lavrenkov et al. 2005; van Baardwijk et al. 2007; Edet-Sanson et al. 2012; Ruysscher und Kirsch 2010; As-hamalla et al. 2005; Bradley et al. 2004; van Baardwijk et al. 2006; Vanuytsel et al. 2000). The superiority of PET compared to stand-alone CT was also shown in two meta-analysis (Gould et al. 2001; Gould et al. 2003). The importance of the 'standardized uptake value' (SUV) or the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) as well as the change in these parameters during radiotherapy has been repeatedly demonstrated (Berghmans et al. 2008, Gillham et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2011; van Elmpt et al. 2012; Edet-Sanson et al. 2012; van Baardwijk et al. 2007; Vera et al. 2014; Vanuytsel et al. 2000; Feifei Na et al. 2014; Lopez Guerra et al. 2012; Lee et al. 2007; Lee et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2011; Xiang et al. 2012). These studies show partly a statistically significant correlation between tumorale FDG-accumulation before, during or after radiotherapy, or the decreasing accumulation during radiotherapy, respectively, and the overall survival. The results, however, suffer from a large uncertainty regarding the distinct influence corresponding to the SUV. Other studies report a significantly weaker association of the SUV and survival (Hoang et al. 2008; IKUSHIMA et al. 2010; Lopez Guerra et al. 2012). Due to the dynamic variations in the SUV and MTV during radiotherapy, a change in the prognostic validity during radiotherapy can be assumed. According to van Elmpt and others, the FDG uptake during the second (van Elmpt et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2011) or fifth week of exposure is crucial for survival (Edet-Sanson et al. 2012). Work by van Baardwijk et al. shows an increase in the SUV in some patients during the first week of therapy, which is explained by radiation-triggered inflammation and tumor-biological changes due to radiotherapy (van Baardwijk et al. 2007). The results demonstrate that the appearance of tumor necrosis during radiotherapy or changes in the metabolic tumor situation or oxygenation affect the SUV parameter crucially (Hoang et al. 2008, Huang et al. 2014; Huang et al. 2011). In this context, tumorhypoxia and the corresponding effects on the metabolism of glucose are of particularly importance: A hypoxia-simulated upregulation of the membranic glucose transporter with consecutive increase of cellular FDG uptage can lead to a false SUV value, calling for a combination of SUV or MTV with other prognostic parameters as well as hypoxia-specific imaging (FMISO-PET) (Ikushima et al. 2010, Berghmans et al. 2008). Consequently, the optimal timevpoint for carrying out a PET during / after radiotherapy is not well defined, especially when the protracted tumor response after completion of radiotherapy is taken into account, leaving the integration of additional PET measurements during radiotherapy exclusively to clinical studies.
In conclusion, evidence from available literature regarding the prognostic and predictive value of tumor volume before and particularly its changes during radiotherapy of locally advanced NSCLC is conflicting and inconclusive. Currently available studies often include only a small number of patients with partly overlapping patient cohorts. Current data is additionally limited due to the highly heterogeneous GTV detection time points as well as the definition and detection methodology of tumor volumes.
Based on the observation that a significant tumor volume reduction occurs during radiotherapy, a reevaluation of the tumor volume during radiotherapy could allow an adaptation of the target volumes with dose escalating in the tumor area, while at the same time, improving the protection of organs at risk.
The prognostic or predictive significance of absolute tumor volumes or their change under radiotherapy is to be evaluated multicentrically and its integration into already existing prognostic models is to be multicentrically validated.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
- Univ.-Klinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie
-
-
-
-
-
Antwerp, Belgium
- Iridium Cancer Network
-
-
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 10117
- Department of Radiooncology, Charité Campus Mitte und Campus Virchow Berlin
-
Cologne, Germany, 50937
- Department of Radiooncology Cologne
-
Dresden, Germany, 01307
- Department of Radiooncology Dresden
-
Dusseldorf, Germany, 40225
- Department of Radiooncology, Düsseldorf
-
Düsseldorf, Germany, 40210
- Department of Radiooncology, Duesseldorf
-
Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Radiooncology, Erlangen
-
Halle, Germany, 06120
- Department of Radiooncology, Halle
-
Hamburg, Germany, 20246
- Department of Radiooncology, Hamburg
-
Hannover, Germany, 30625
- Department of Radiooncology, Hannover
-
Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
- Department of Radiooncology, Heidelberg
-
Jena, Germany, 07743
- Department of Radiooncology, Jena
-
Kiel, Germany, 24105
- Department of Radiooncology, Kiel
-
Lubeck Hansestadt, Germany, 23562
- Department of Radiooncology Lübeck
-
Mannheim, Germany, 68167
- Department of Radiooncology, Mannheim
-
Muenster, Germany, 48143
- Department of Radiooncology, Muenster
-
Munich, Germany, 81377
- Department of Radiooncology, Munich (LMU, Campus Großhadern)
-
Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiooncology, Munich (TUM)
-
Regensburg, Germany, 93047
- Department of Radiooncology, Regensburg
-
-
-
-
-
Sevilla, Spain
- Department of Radiooncology, Sevilla
-
-
-
-
-
St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie, St. Gallen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed NSCLC (Adeno / SCC) Stage UICC III A or B
- CT based radiation treatment planning (PET- or PET-CT-based if available)
- completed curative-intended radiotherapy ± chemotherapy (achieved total dose ≥ 60 Gy normofractionated or ≥ 50 Gy hypofractionated)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Stereotactic radiotherapy
- Second malignancy <5 years before diagnosis of NSCLC
- Pleural effusion ipsilateral, extensive atelectasis ipsilateral
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
Locally advanced NSCLC-patients
Inoperable stage III (A and B) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with indication for radical radiotherapy.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Overall Survival (months)
Time Frame: 5 months
|
from the start of Radiotherapy until death / last seen during follow up
|
5 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Absolute Basal Gross Tumor Volume (ml) before Radiotherapy (GTV1)
Time Frame: 5 months
|
in ml (cc) as detected by initial planning CT or diagnostic CT before the start of RT
|
5 months
|
Absolute Gross Tumor Volume before Radiation Boost (GTV2)
Time Frame: 5 months
|
in ml (cc) as detected in re-planning CT or CBCT before initiation of radiation boost
|
5 months
|
Relative Gross Tumor Volume Changes (delta GTV related to basal GTV)
Time Frame: 5 months
|
percental increase / decrease of GTV in relation to basal GTV1
|
5 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christian Ostheimer, MD, Klinik fuer Strahlentherapie, Martin-Luther-Universitaet Halle-Wittenberg
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ARO 2017-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III
-
Oslo University HospitalAstraZenecaActive, not recruitingCancer | NSCLC | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer | NSCLC, Stage III | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIINorway, Finland, Lithuania, Estonia
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterAstraZenecaRecruitingNSCLC | Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | PD-L1 Gene Mutation | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIIA | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIUnited States
-
Alexander ChiNot yet recruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Carcinoma | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIChina
-
Stanford UniversityAstraZenecaRecruitingNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIUnited States
-
Northwestern UniversityBristol-Myers Squibb; National Cancer Institute (NCI)UnknownStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Recurrent Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma | Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer | Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung CancerUnited States
-
AIO-Studien-gGmbHBristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly and Company; Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC; Pfizer; Gilead... and other collaboratorsRecruitingSmall-cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage I | Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IIGermany
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7United States
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)TerminatedStage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Mesothelin PositiveUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)NRG OncologyTerminatedStage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer AJCC v7United States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisBristol-Myers SquibbTerminatedNon Small Cell Lung Cancer | Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV | Non Small Cell Lung Cancer Stage III | Non-Small Cell Carcinoma of LungFrance