Patient-Centered Decision Support to Improve Diabetes Management in Pre-Teens and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes (CHICAT1)

August 3, 2022 updated by: Tamara S. Hannon, Indiana University
Investigators propose to study an intervention that will provide patient-centered, automated decision support to diabetes providers with the goals of improving adherence to medical recommendations (both patients and providers), improving self-management, and ultimately improving health outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Investigators propose to study an intervention that will provide patient-centered, automated decision support to diabetes providers with the goals of improving adherence to medical recommendations (both patients and providers), improving self-management, and ultimately improving health outcomes. Computer decision support systems (CDSS) have scientifically demonstrated advantages for improving care, and the potential to revolutionize diabetes care because they allow for increased reactive and proactive contact with the health care team, real-time adherence support, and intensification of treatment. In this study,investigators will implement the ADA recommended standards of care using a CDSS developed by the research group - the Child Health Improvement through Computer Automation (CHICA) system.9 One of the greatest strengths of the CHICA system is its ability to implement evidence-based recommendations from authoritative sources, in this case the ADA, in a format that integrates easily into routine care. A second strength of the CHICA system is its ability to screen for patient-centered concerns, including barriers to optimal care such as literacy, socioeconomic issues (i.e., food insecurity, housing insecurity, etc.), and mental health issues (i.e., depression). The provider is alerted, and safety mechanisms are set in motion (i.e., referral to mental health provider, etc.) to address identified issues. In order to ensure that we design the most effective CDSS intervention possible, the study team, in collaboration with the Patient Engagement Core (PEC) of the Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute, will partner with adolescents, parents, and other stakeholders in a way that exceeds standard expectations for the engagement of these parties in research. Investigators have experience working directly with patients to elucidate patient-centered outcomes, identify determinants of adherence, and to co-design interventions that are inherently more patient-centered.10-14 By combining a patient-centered design approach along with CDSS investigators will be able to individually tailor recommendations to meet the real needs of patients, taking into account the adolescent patient's perspective and input. This truly innovative approach will offer improved technology-based support systems for diabetes management along with attention to patient-centered goals using co-designed interventions for diabetes self-management.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Riley Hospital for Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adolescents with type 1 diabetes
  2. Parents of adolescents with type 1 diabetes
  3. Friends/siblings of adolescents with type 1 diabetes
  4. Community partners who work with adolescents with type 1 diabetes
  5. Diabetes care providers

    -

    Exclusion Criteria:

    -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patient-Centered Decision Support
Intervention - computer decision support in diabetes clinic. Investigators will use a computerized decision support system to aid clinicians to provide standard of care management while introducing patient-centered guidelines and outcomes measures. The intervention is the use of an electronic decision support tool. The decision support tool consists of a series of questions answered by the patients that will then allow the health care provider to address specific needs during the visit.
Patient-Centered Decision Support to Improve Diabetes Mgmt. We will use a computerized decision support system to aid clinicians to provide standard of care management while introducing patient-centered guidelines and outcomes measures.The intervention is the use of an electronic decision support tool. The decision support tool consists of a series of questions answered by the patients that will then allow the health care provider to address specific needs during the visit.
No Intervention: Standard Care
Standard pediatric diabetes care will be compared to the computerized decision support system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HbA1c value
Time Frame: 4 years
Measure of HbA1c value for youth subjects
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: 4 years
Number of episodes of hypoglycemia during study
4 years
DKA
Time Frame: 4 years
Number of episodes of DKA during study
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tamara Hannon, MD, Indiana University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 27, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1612394802
  • 1DP3DK113183-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Arm 1

3
Subscribe