Accuracy of Acoustic Rainbow Monitoring (ARM) Sensor

October 22, 2018 updated by: Masimo Corporation
The purpose of the study was to conduct a side by side comparison of the accuracy of the respiratory rate (RR) between our Acoustic Rainbow Monitoring (ARM) sensor and the Oridian Microcap Capnograph in healthy adults. Our hypothesis was that the ARM sensor would have comparable or a better performance than the capnograph.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92618
        • Masimo Clinical Lab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy adult volunteers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • under age of 18

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test group
The subjects will be enrolled into the test group and will receive ARM sensor.
Acoustic Monitoring sensor that monitors respiratory rate
Other Names:
  • RAS-125c

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of Respiratory Rate determination
Time Frame: 40 minutes
Accuracy is calculated using ARMS analysis
40 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 17, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

May 22, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • TR18351C-TP15637A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on ARM sensor

Subscribe