Transforming the Cascade Of Hepatitis C Care

January 14, 2021 updated by: Norman Randall Kolb, University of Pittsburgh

Transforming the Cascade of Hepatitis C Care

Several factors are barriers to effective Hepatitis C care: 1) The majority of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV)-positive patients (45-85 percent) are unaware that they are infected; 2) Only a small minority of those in need of treatment receive it; 3) Members of minorities and older patients are even less likely to receive needed care; and 4) Until recently, even those who were treated had a low chance of clearing the virus or achieving cure; 5) It is possible that older attitudes and expectation of futility might continue to persist among patients and provider in primary care settings.

Community Health Centers are often the most culturally appropriate and accessible choices, particularly for underserved populations, with the benefit of ongoing trust and relationships with patients. Therefore, these can be ideal places to deliver complex HCV care if they possess the needed expertise. However, most community-based primary care and community health centers lack access to Hepatitis C evaluation and treatment services, leading to a major public health problem.

Thus, investigators propose to implement and evaluate a pragmatic trial to implement and evaluate a multi-disciplinary model for HCV treatment at Currently, the treatment initiation rates at each of these sites is estimated as less than 10%. The investigators hypothesize that our project will increase the rate of participation in all the steps of the HCV care cascade and ultimately lead to more than doubled rates of treatment uptake

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Primary Objective:

Determine uptake, effectiveness and safety of IFN-free, DAAs among "real world" patients, including those with multiple comorbidities, in the primary care setting.

Secondary Objective(s):

  1. Demonstrate the transformation of the cascade of Hepatitis C Care at 3 primary care clinics in terms of changes from baseline in rates for rates of access to HCV care including HCV screening, evaluation, treatment consideration, treatment uptake, completion, loss to follow-up, and treatment success rate.
  2. Advance understanding of hepatitis C related decision-making in the era of Interferon (IFN)-free Direct acting agents (DAAs) by examining the context, needs, motivators, barriers, and preferences among patients and providers to the delivery of hepatitis C treatment at primary care clinics

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

325

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15232
        • UPMC Shadyside Family Health Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with detectable HCV RNA level, currently receiving care at any of these three community health centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients with detectable HCV RNA level, currently receiving care at any of these three community health centers

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Criteria for automatic specialty referral (exclusion from treatment at community health centers) Child Turcotte Pugh Class B or C Any history of decompensated liver disease or hepatocellular carcinoma Evidence of renal disease (GFR <50) or coexisting autoimmune condition HIV of hepatitis B co-infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients achieving sustained viral response 12 weeks post treatment (SVR 12) over a three year intervention period.
Time Frame: three years
measure percentage of patients moving through the cascade of care to cure of condition (SVR 12)
three years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) screening
Time Frame: three years
Percentage of at risk patients in the practice who have a completed HCV antibody test
three years
Rate of Chronic Hepatitis C evaluation
Time Frame: three years
Percentage of patients with a positive HCV antibody test who have a HCV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) viral load completed
three years
Rate of treatment consideration
Time Frame: three years
Percentage of consented patients with a positive HCV viral load who have a clinical evaluation and assessment of psychosocial readiness for treatment documented in the medical record
three years
Rate of treatment uptake
Time Frame: three years
Percentage of patients recommended for treatment who begin medical treatment
three years
Rate of treatment completion
Time Frame: three years
Percentage of patients that began treatment who complete the recommended course of therapy
three years
Rate of patients lost to follow up
Time Frame: three years
Percent of consented patients with a positive HCV viral load who are lost to follow up
three years
Hepatitis C capacity building among family medicine physicians (provider practice and perceived confidence):
Time Frame: three years
Endpoints related to HCV capacity building among family medicine physicians: Evaluate comfort and skill among family physicians to evaluate and treat HCV infection as measured on a qualitative survey of physicians
three years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

January 14, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C, Chronic

Subscribe