Clinical Evaluation of Multifocal Intraocular Lens: OPTIVIS.TM (MFIOL)

April 18, 2018 updated by: ANNA MARTÍNEZ PALMER, Parc de Salut Mar

Clinical Evaluation of Multifocal Intraocular Lens: OPTIVIS.TM (Evolución clínica de Lente Intraocular Multifocal: OPTIVIS.TM)

This study evaluated visual outcome after cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of either a diffractive - refractive (hybrid) multifocal intraocular lens (MFIOL) or monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) as a control grup.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PURPOSE: To present the outcomes of hybrid multifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses (IOL)

SETTING: Parc de Salut Mar, Universidad Pompeu-Fabra - Autónoma, Barcelona, Spain.

DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial.

METHODS: Consecutive patients with bilateral cataract were included. Phacoemulsification with randomized implantation of either a monofocal IOL (AR40e, AMO-Abbot 30 Laboratories Inc. Abbot Park, Illinois, USA) or multifocal IOL (OptiVis™, Aaren Scientific, Inc, Ontario, CA, USA) was performed by the same surgeon and under the same conditions. Over a 3-month follow-up, the main outcome measures were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity at 60 cm (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA), uncorrected near visual acuity at 33 cm (UNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), spherical equivalent (SE), contrast sensitivity (CS), presence of dysphotopsia, use of spectacles and patient satisfaction with the test VF-14 (Visual Function Index) .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • senile cataract with Snellen visual acuity ≤ 0.5,
  • motivation for spectacle independence for near vision (as the study was conducted in Spanish public health care system, entering study was the only option to get multifocal lens, as they are not provided by public health care, and the patients were conscious of the possibility of randomization to monofocal group.)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • corneal astigmatism ≥ 1.10 diopters (D) and irregular astigmatism,
  • axial length < 21.5 or ≥ 25 mm,
  • pupillary diameter in mesopic conditions in distance vision ≤ 2.5 mm and ≥ 6 mm,
  • ocular pathology that could affect the visual function and/or intraocular lens centering and intraoperative or postoperative complications.
  • highly demanding patients and those whose profession could be affected by a multifocal design (professional drivers, jewelers etc.) were also excluded (as in the Spanish public health care system secondary procedures needed to satisfy patients' expectation, such as LRI´s, LASIK, PRK´s, are not available).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multifocal IOL (OptiVis)

Ambulatory surgery was performed by the same, experienced surgeon, under topical anesthesia, using as a technique phacoemulsification with small incision (2.75) in clear cornea in the most curved meridian.

The randomly assigned IOL (in this arm: a hybrid (refractive-diffractive) multifocal IOL (OptiVis, Aaren Scientific) was implanted in the capsular bag. The second eye with the same type of lens of the first eye was operated within 2-4 weeks.

All the surgeries were performed under topical anesthesia using a standard phacoemulsification procedure with Infiniti Vision System (all from Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, TX).
Other Names:
  • a hybrid multifocal intraocular lens
Active Comparator: Monofocal IOL

Ambulatory surgery was performed by the same, experienced surgeon, under topical anesthesia, using as a technique phacoemulsification with small incision (2.75) in clear cornea in the most curved meridian.

The randomly assigned IOL (in this arm: a monofocal IOL (AR40e, AMO) was implanted in the capsular bag. The second eye with the same type of lens of the first eye was operated within 2-4 weeks.

All the surgeries were performed under topical anesthesia using a standard phacoemulsification procedure with Infiniti Vision System (all from Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, TX).
Other Names:
  • AR40e, AMO-Abbot 30 Laboratories Inc.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual function
Time Frame: The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Changes in visual acuity in logMAR: uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) at 6 m, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 60 cm (in the OptiVis group only, as they were supposed to provide intermediate distance vision in contrary to monofocal lenses), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 33 cm. All measured using Snellen acuity charts under photopic conditions.
The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contrast sensitivity (CS)
Time Frame: The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Changes in monocular and binocular CS were measured in mesopic conditions, without glare at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12 and 18 cycles per degree (cpd) using the Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT, OPTEC 6500®, Stereo Optical Co. Inc)
The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Refractive Outcomes
Time Frame: The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
The predictability of the refractive outcome. Postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) and SE within ±0.50 D of the attempted spherical correction (emmetropy) and within ±1.00 D of the attempted spherical correction (emmetropy).
The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Spectacle dependence
Time Frame: The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Spectacle dependence, determined by questionnaire (Do you wear glasses for distance/near vision?).
The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Presence of dysphotopsia
Time Frame: The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Presence of dysphotopsia (halos, glare), spontaneously mentioned or elicited in response to questioning were determined by questionnaire.
The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)
Patient satisfaction was also assessed with the VF-14 test, consisting of 14 questions evaluating various patient activities.
The last follow-up visit (3 months after the surgery)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ana Martinez Palmer, PhD, Parc de Salut Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 4, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 4, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

June 4, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 1, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2013/5432/I

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data are available now as the conducted study was finished and until the publication will be in press. After that all data will be available via journal requests

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requesters will be required to sign a Data Access Agreement

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract Senile

Clinical Trials on OptiVis, Aaren Scientific

3
Subscribe