Auto-evaluation of Dyspnea

Dyspnea Evaluated by a Qualified Examiner in Patients With Lung Diseases

The primary aim of this study was to compare patients-rated evaluation and caregiver's assessment of dyspnea with the standard tools in pulmonology unit (Borg scale and visual analog scale) and the secondary aim was to performed an analysis depending on the diseases (lung cancer vs. other lung diseases) and to verify the agreement between the evaluation between both visual analog scale and modified Borg scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

271

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, 1200
        • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

all lung diseases

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥18 and
  • to have a diagnosis of acute or chronic respiratory disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  • mental or cognitive disorders
  • inability to understand the local language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
lung cancer
dyspnea assessment
Other Names:
  • evaluation
other lung diseases
dyspnea assessment
Other Names:
  • evaluation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
visual analog scale
Time Frame: 3 seconds
3 seconds
borg scale
Time Frame: 3 seconds
3 seconds

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2018

Last Verified

June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Autodyspnea

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Diseases

Clinical Trials on dyspnea

3
Subscribe