Ankle Taping and Functional Ankle Instability

August 7, 2018 updated by: Yea-Ru Yang, National Yang Ming University

Effects of Rigid Ankle Tape and Fibular Tape on Functional Performance in Participants With Functional Ankle Instability

Background and purpose:

Ankle inversion sprains are the commonest injuries of the lower extremities. Taping is routinely used after ankle sprain to support the joint and prevent reinjury. The effect of taping on functional performance in participants after ankle sprain has received little attention and generally with inconsistent findings. Besides, the perception of confidence and reassurance that may come with the ankle being taped might lead to the improvement of functional mobility performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of rigid ankle tape and fibular tape on functional performance, self-efficacy and perceived stability, confidence and reassurance during functional tasks in participants with functional ankle instability.

Methods:

This study is a randomized controlled trial. Forty subjects with functional ankle instability will be recruited and randomly assigned into the rigid tape group and the fibular tape group. Participants will perform functional mobility tests with and without the ankle taped. The functional tests are: figure-8 hopping test, lateral hopping test, star excursion balance test (SEBT), single-leg stance and stair decent test. Secondary outcome measures were self-efficacy and perception measure.

Statistics:

Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to determine the effects of intervention on each dependent variable. Model effects were group, time (pre, post), and their interaction. Post hoc pairwise comparisons between pre and post in each group, and independent t test between groups, were used to document the difference. The statistical significance was set at p less than 0.05.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 112
        • National Yang-Ming University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. participants had to have sustained at least two ankle sprain from a sudden inversion trauma, at least one month prior, which resulted in pain and swelling over the lateral ligament and limping, and have at least moderate functional ankle instability
  2. a score of <27 on the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)
  3. anterior drawer test: negative
  4. talar tilt test: negative

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. if they had sprained their ankle within two weeks of testing
  2. had a neurological or vestibular disorder or were unable to understand the nature of the protocol and test instructions.
  3. have received intervention for ankle instability
  4. PI's research assistant -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: rigid tape group
Device: Rigid tape
This taping method used an anchor, two stirrups, three figure-six's (two preventing inversion and one preventing eversion), heel lock and a lock off. Adhesive rigid strapping tape (Leuko Sports Tape, Beiersdorf Australia Ltd, North Ryde) of 3.8 cm thickness was used for all participants
Experimental: fibular tape group
Device: Fibular tape
This taping method used a rigid strapping tape to reinforce a posterior-superior mobilisation of the distal fibula. Tension was applied on the tape in a posterior and superior direction. Adhesive rigid strapping tape (Leuko Sports Tape, Beiersdorf Australia Ltd, North Ryde) of 3.8 cm thickness was used for all participants

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Figure-8 hopping test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
This test consists of hopping twice around a 5 m course on the test foot in a figure-8, as quickly as possible. The time taken for the participant to complete two circuits of the figure-8 was measured using a stopwatch, and the average of the two best times out of three attempts was recorded.
Change from baseline at one hour
Lateral hopping test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
participants were instructed to hop laterally 30 cm and back for a total of 10 repetitions. The total time was recorded with a handheld stopwatch to the nearest 0.01 second.
Change from baseline at one hour
Star excursion balance test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
This test examined the ability to balance on the affected leg while reaching in various directions with the other foot. Participants stood on the test foot at the central point, and using the other foot reached as far as possible in each of three of the 8 directions of the star excursion balance test (anterior, posterior and postero-medial, relative to the test foot). Only three directions were used due to redundancy among the eight directions. Participants made three attempts in each test direction with the average of the best two attempts for each direction recorded in centimetre
Change from baseline at one hour
Single-leg stance test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
Participants were instructed to balance on one leg for 30 s with their eyes closed, arms at their side, and the other foot touching the medial side of the supporting calf. If they lost their balance, participants were instructed to keep their eyes closed and attempt to re-establish their balance. The number of foot movements made by the stance foot during the 30 s was counted. A foot movement was counted if any of the following occurred: loss of contact with the ground by any part of the foot; a change in foot direction; or each instance when the contralateral foot touched the ground. The lowest total number of foot movements from three attempts was recorded.
Change from baseline at one hour
Stair decent test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
Participants were instructed to run down a flight of 11 stairs as quickly as possible, ensuring that they made contact with every step with one foot, and without using the handrail.The time taken from the first step to touchdown by both feet at the bottom of the flight of stairs was measured. The two best times out of three attempts was averaged.
Change from baseline at one hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
The self-efficacy questionnaire was modified from the pain self-efficacy questionnaire, to compare participants' self-reported confidence in performing a range of functionally challenging tasks. The questionnaire consisted of 17 items related to tasks of increasing difficulty. Participants rated their level of confidence in their ability to perform each activity.
Change from baseline at one hour
Self-perception measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one hour
Three perception measures were recorded at the completion of each functional test to determine whether there was a difference in participants' perceptions between the tape and no tape conditions. Participants recorded their perception of ankle stability, confidence and reassurance. Stability was defined as "how stable your ankle felt during the test", confidence as "how positive you felt during the test", and reassurance as "how safe you felt during the test".
Change from baseline at one hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

National Yang Ming University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 6, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 27, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 7, 2018

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • YM106003F

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Sprains

Clinical Trials on Rigid tape

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Moldova

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe