Minimally Invasive Right Colectomy Anastomosis Study (MIRCAST)

A Prospective Observational Multi-center 4 Cohort Study Comparing Robotic Assisted and Laparoscopic Invasive Right Colectomy and Intracorporeal Anastomosis Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis

Right colectomy (hemicolectomy) involves the removal of the cecum, the ascending colon, the hepatic flexure, the first one-third of the transverse colon, part of the terminal ileum, and the associated regional fat and lymph nodes, and is the accepted treatment for malignant neoplasms of the right colon.

A minimally invasive approach is commonly used for right colectomy, with studies reporting reduced complications, less blood loss, and hospital stay when compared to an open approach.

However, there remains controversy regarding whether robotic assistance is advantageous for this technique and whether an intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) is best.

MIRCAST is a prospective, observational, international, multi-center, 4-parallel-cohorts study. Sites or surgeons will select a cohort of the study for which they are qualified. Four cohorts will be the subject of study:

  1. Robotic Right Colectomy with ICA
  2. Robotic Right Colectomy with ECA
  3. Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with ICA
  4. Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with ECA

All patient assessments will be done according to the sites standard of care. Parameters routinely recorded during right colectomy surgery will be collected prospectively. Enrolled subjects will undergo assessments at the following intervals: pre-operative, operative, discharge, 30 days, 3 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

MIRCAST study is an observational, prospective, parallel cohorts, international, multi-center to compare robotic assisted and laparoscopic minimally invasive right colectomy, and intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis.

The research is coordinated by Marcos Gómez Ruiz MD PhD from Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla in Santander, Spain; the sponsorship is performed by Fundacion Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla (IDIVAL). The European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) endorses MIRCAST Study and will run a quality audit/independent monitoring of the study.

The objectives of study are to compare of the peri-operative complications after robotic assisted and laparoscopic minimally invasive right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis.

To Identify potential benefits of robotic assisted procedures for right colon resections.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Požega, Croatia
        • Recruiting
        • County Hospital Požega
      • Aabenraa, Denmark
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Hospital of Southern Denmark
      • Køge, Denmark
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Zealand University Hospital
      • Hämeenlinna, Finland
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Kanta-Hämeen Keskussairaala
        • Contact:
          • Arto Turunen
      • Kotka, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • Kymenlaakso Central Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Pälvi Vento
      • Lahti, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • Päijät-Häme Central Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jyrki Kössi
      • Oulu, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • Oulu University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Tero Rautio
      • Seinäjoki, Finland
        • Recruiting
        • Seinäjoki Central Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Tarja Pinta
      • Bordeaux, France
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Hôpital Haut-Lévèque- CHU
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Chu Estaing
        • Contact:
          • Anne DUBOIS
      • Montpellier, France
        • Recruiting
        • ICM - Institut Regional du Cancer de Montpellier
        • Contact:
          • Philippe ROUANET
      • Strasbourg, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHRU de Strasbourg Hôpital Civil
        • Contact:
          • Benoit ROMAIN Benoit
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • CHRU Nancy Brabois
        • Contact:
          • Laurent BRESLER
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
        • Contact:
          • Markus Winny
    • Athina
      • Athens, Athina, Greece
        • Recruiting
        • Eurokliniki Athinou
        • Contact:
          • Thalia Petropoulou
      • Florence, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • AOU-Careggi
        • Contact:
          • Andrea Coratti
      • Grosseto, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Ospedale La Misericordia
        • Contact:
          • Paolo Pietro Bianchi, MD PhD
      • Milan, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • IEO - European Institute of Oncology
        • Contact:
          • Wanda Luisa Petz
      • Roma, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
        • Contact:
          • Dominico D´Ugo
      • Rozzano, Italy
        • Recruiting
        • HUMANITAS Research Hospital
      • Torino, Italy
        • Not yet recruiting
        • IRCCS Istituto di Candiolo
        • Contact:
          • Dario RIBERO
      • Leiria, Portugal
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centro Hospitalar de Leiria
        • Contact:
          • Nuno Rama
      • Almería, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Complejo Hospitalario de Torrecardenas
        • Contact:
          • Pedro Antonio Sanchez Fuentes, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Angel Reina Duarte
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Francisco Rubio Gil
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Manuel Ferrer Marquez
      • León, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital de Leon
        • Contact:
          • Vicente Simó Fernández
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Vicente Simó Fernández
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre
        • Contact:
          • Eduardo Rubio Gonzalez
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Oscar García Villar
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • María Labalde Martinez
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Eduardo Rubio Gonzalez
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clínico San Carlos
        • Contact:
          • Mauricio García Alonso, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Oscar Cano Valderrama
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mauricio García Alonso
    • Alicante
      • Elche, Alicante, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital General Universitario de Elche
        • Contact:
          • Antonio Arroyo Sebastián, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Antonio Arroyo Sebastián
    • Asturias
      • Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Central de Asturias
        • Contact:
          • Nuria Truan Alonso
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nuria Truan Alonso
    • Cantabria
      • Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 39008
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
        • Contact:
          • Marcos Gómez Ruiz, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carmen Cagigas Fernández
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Julio José Del Castillo Diego
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Joaquin Alonso Martín
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Lidia Cristobal Poch
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Manuel Gómez Fleitas
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marcos Gómez Ruiz
    • Cataluña
      • Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Vall d´Hebrón
        • Contact:
          • Eloy ESPIN
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Franco Marinello
    • Pais Vasco
      • San Sebastián, Pais Vasco, Spain
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Donostia
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carlos Placer Galán
        • Principal Investigator:
          • José María Enriquez Navascues
      • Portsmouth, United Kingdom
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Portsmouth Hospital NHS Trust
        • Contact:
          • Jim Kahn

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Right colon tumor with indication for right colectomy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older.
  • Right colon tumor with indication for right colectomy (benign or malignant disease)
  • Patient has a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • Patients with adequate performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Scale score of ≤2)
  • Patient has signed and dated the Informed consent before patient inclusion in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a comorbid illness or condition that would preclude the use of surgery
  • Patients with cT4b tumors
  • Patients unwilling to comply with all follow-up study requirements
  • Patient undergoing emergency procedures
  • Planned colonic surgery along with major concomitant procedures (e.g. liver resections, other intestinal resections)
  • Metastatic disease
  • Pregnant or suspected pregnancy
  • Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Crohn´s Disease or Ulcerative Colitis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robotic Right Colectomy with ICA

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS), allows many types of complex MIS procedures using robotic systems to aid in surgical procedures providing more precision, flexibility and control than is possible with other MIS techniques.

Intracorporeal anastomosis: when the anastomosis is performed inside the abdominal cavity with a laparoscopic or robotic technique. A Pfannenstiel incision will be done exclusively for specimen extraction.

Anastomosis is performed inside the abdominal cavity with a laparoscopic or robotic technique
Procedure is performed using robotic instruments
Robotic Right Colectomy with ECA

Robot-assisted surgery (RAS), allows many types of complex MIS procedures using robotic systems to aid in surgical procedures providing more precision, flexibility and control than is possible with other MIS techniques.

Extracorporeal anastomosis: when the anastomosis is performed by pulling out the bowel through a laparotomy wherever that laparotomy is performed.

Procedure is performed using robotic instruments
Anastomosis is performed by pulling out the bowel through a laparotomy wherever that laparotomy is performed.
Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with ICA

Laparoscopic surgery, also called minimally invasive surgery (MIS), or keyhole surgery, is a surgical technique in which operations are performed far from their location through small incisions (usually 0.5-1.5 cm) elsewhere in the body.

Intracorporeal anastomosis: when the anastomosis is performed inside the abdominal cavity with a laparoscopic or robotic technique. A Pfannenstiel incision will be done exclusively for specimen extraction.

Anastomosis is performed inside the abdominal cavity with a laparoscopic or robotic technique
Procedure is performed using standard laparoscopic instruments
Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with ECA

Laparoscopic surgery, also called minimally invasive surgery (MIS), or keyhole surgery, is a surgical technique in which operations are performed far from their location through small incisions (usually 0.5-1.5 cm) elsewhere in the body.

Extracorporeal anastomosis: when the anastomosis is performed by pulling out the bowel through a laparotomy wherever that laparotomy is performed.

Anastomosis is performed by pulling out the bowel through a laparotomy wherever that laparotomy is performed.
Procedure is performed using standard laparoscopic instruments

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgical wound infection
Time Frame: 30 days
(CDC definition [Health Protection Agency. Surveillance of Surgical Site Infection in England: October 1997-September 2005. London: Health Protection Agency; 2006): Superficial incisional, affecting the skin and subcutaneous tissue. These infections may be indicated by localised (Celsian) signs such as redness, pain, heat or swelling at the site of the incision or by the drainage of pus.
30 days
Clavien Dindo Complication
Time Frame: 30 days
Complications according to Clavien Dindo Classification.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: 2 years
The length of time from either the date of diagnosis or the start of treatment for a disease, such as cancer, that patients diagnosed with the disease are still alive
2 years
Disease Free Survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 2 years
Length of time after primary treatment for a cancer ends that the patient survives without any signs or symptoms of that cancer.
2 years
Local Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of cancer that has recurred at or near the same place as the original (primary) tumor
2 years
Distant metastases rate
Time Frame: 2 years
Rate of Cancer that has spread from the original (primary) tumor to distant organs or distant lymph nodes
2 years
Rate of Unplanned Conversions to open surgery
Time Frame: 7 days
When anything apart of the anastomosis had to be done through the laparotomy. If the anastomosis is not completely performed in an intracorporeal approach, the case is considered also converted
7 days
Operative time (min)
Time Frame: 7 days
Operative time from skin to skin in minutes
7 days
Complete mesocolic excision (CME)
Time Frame: 30 days
Complete Mesocolic Excision is defined as complete resection of the mesocolon with its anatomical envelope. Anatomical report should include any defect on CME specimen (Hohenberger W, Weber K., Matzel K., Papadopoulost T., Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation - technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Disease 11, 354-365 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01735.x)
30 days
Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes
Time Frame: 30 days
Number of harvested Lymph nodes according to the definitive pathological report.
30 days
R0 Resection
Time Frame: 30 days
Rate of resection without any affected margins during the surgical procedure.
30 days
Length of Stay (LOS, days)
Time Frame: 3 months
In hospital stay of the patient from the day that they are admitted before surgery to the day that they are fit to leave the hospital after the procedure.
3 months
Ventral hernia (assessed 1& 2 years after the right colectomy)
Time Frame: 1 and 2 years after the procedure
Incidence of ventral hernia 1 year after the procedure and 2 years after the procedure at the laparotomy site.
1 and 2 years after the procedure
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year after the procedure
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Score 3 months and 1 year after the procedure.
3 months and 1 year after the procedure
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR29
Time Frame: 3 months and 1 year after the procedure
Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CR29 Score 3 months and 1 year after the procedure.
3 months and 1 year after the procedure
C-Reactive Protein value (CRP) days 1 & 3 postoperative
Time Frame: 1 and 3 postoperative days.
CRP values on postoperative day 1 and 3.
1 and 3 postoperative days.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procalcitonine (PCT) days 1, 3 & 5 postoperative
Time Frame: 1, 3 and 5 postoperative days
PCT values on postoperative dates 1, 3 and 5
1, 3 and 5 postoperative days
Time to deambulation
Time Frame: 30 days
Time until patient gets out of bed and engages in light activity (such as sitting, standing, or walking)
30 days
Return to work/activity
Time Frame: 30 days and 3 months
o Time to start working/activity at patient´s job again
30 days and 3 months
Pain evaluation
Time Frame: Postoperative days 1, 3 and 5
Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at postoperative days. Scores will range from 0 to 10 (0 no pain and 10 a pain you would rather prefer to die).
Postoperative days 1, 3 and 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marcos Gómez Ruiz, MD PhD, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, IDIVAL
  • Study Chair: Galo Peralta, MD, Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe