Clinical and Histological Outcomes of Allogenic Amnion Chorion Membrane in the Healing of Free Gingival Graft Donor Site

December 17, 2021 updated by: Chun-Teh Lee, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to compare an allogenic amnion chorion membrane to a collagen dressing in palatal wound healing after harvesting free gingival graft (FGG).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

19

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients attending the Clinic for Graduate Periodontics at The University of Texas health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry who are in need of a Free Gingival Graft procedure to augment keratinized gingiva, augment ridge, or cover recession defects.
  • systemically healthy or with controlled common systemic conditions, such as hypertension, that will not affect wound healing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • size of the FGG that the patient needs bigger than the size of FGGs that have to be harvested in this study (two 8mm (width) x 10mm (length) x ≈1.5mm (thickness) FGG).
  • current heavy smokers(>10 cigarettes/day) (patients who stop smoking more than one year are eligible)
  • have diabetes or other systemic diseases that may comprise healing
  • take antibiotics and/or analgesics within one week before the procedure and have loss of sensation on the palate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Allogenic amnion chorion membrane
Allogenic amnion chorion membrane (ACM) is a minimally manipulated allograft amnion chorion tissue for use as a wound covering in dental surgery.
Allogenic amnion chorion membrane (ACM) is a minimally manipulated allograft amnion chorion tissue for use as a wound covering in dental surgery.
Active Comparator: Collagen dressing
Collagen dressing is used to cover wounds in dental surgery.
Collagen dressing is used to cover wounds in dental surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: baseline
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
baseline
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 4 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
4 days
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 10 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
10 days
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 14 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
14 days
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 21 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
21 days
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 28 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
28 days
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 45 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
45 days
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 60 days
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture. The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound. A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale. Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization. The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: baseline
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
baseline
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 4 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
4 days
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 10 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
10 days
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 14 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
14 days
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 21 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
21 days
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 28 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
28 days
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 45 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
45 days
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 60 days
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface. Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
60 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: baseline
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
baseline
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 4 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
4 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 10 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
10 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 14 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
14 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 21 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
21 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 28 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
28 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 45 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
45 days
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 60 days
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
60 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: baseline
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
baseline
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 4 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
4 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 10 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
10 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 14 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
14 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 21 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
21 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 28 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
28 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 45 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
45 days
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 60 days
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
60 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
baseline
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
4 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 10 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
10 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 14 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
14 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 21 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
21 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 28 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
28 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 45 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
45 days
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 60 days
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
60 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: baseline
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensitivity based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
baseline
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 4 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
4 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 10 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
10 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 14 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
14 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 21 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
21 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 28 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
28 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 45 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
45 days
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 60 days
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception. Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
60 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: baseline
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
baseline
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 4 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
4 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 10 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
10 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 14 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
14 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 21 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
21 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 28 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
28 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 45 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
45 days
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 60 days
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
60 days
Clinician's Feedback on the Wound Dressing Material as Assessed by a Questionnaire
Time Frame: at the time of placement of the wound dressing material
at the time of placement of the wound dressing material
Number of Neutrophil Cells as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: baseline
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested. The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope.
baseline
Number of Neutrophil Cells as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: 10 days
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested. The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope.
10 days
Change in Percentage of Collagen Density in Wound Area as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Masson's Trichrome-stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: baseline, 10 days
baseline, 10 days
Thickness of the Epithelium as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: baseline
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested. The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope, and Nikon NIS-Elements Advanced Research (AR) Imagine Software will be used to calculate the thickness of the epithelium.
baseline
Thickness of the Epithelium as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: 10 days
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested. The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope, and Nikon NIS-Elements Advanced Research (AR) Imagine Software will be used to calculate the thickness of the epithelium.
10 days
Angiogenesis as Indicated by Number of Blood Vessels as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Biopsy Sections Immunohistochemically Stained to Detect Factor VIII (Von Willebrandt Factor)
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
Angiogenesis as Indicated by Number of Blood Vessels as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Biopsy Sections Immunohistochemically Stained to Detect Factor VIII (Von Willebrandt Factor)
Time Frame: 10 days
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested. The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope, and the area of angiogenesis will be quantified using Nikon NIS Element AR Imagine Software.
10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chun-Teh Lee, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 3, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 17, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-DB-18-0303

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Palatal Wound

Clinical Trials on Allogenic amnion chorion membrane

Subscribe