- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03713073
Clinical and Histological Outcomes of Allogenic Amnion Chorion Membrane in the Healing of Free Gingival Graft Donor Site
December 17, 2021 updated by: Chun-Teh Lee, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The purpose of this study is to compare an allogenic amnion chorion membrane to a collagen dressing in palatal wound healing after harvesting free gingival graft (FGG).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
19
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients attending the Clinic for Graduate Periodontics at The University of Texas health Science Center at Houston School of Dentistry who are in need of a Free Gingival Graft procedure to augment keratinized gingiva, augment ridge, or cover recession defects.
- systemically healthy or with controlled common systemic conditions, such as hypertension, that will not affect wound healing.
Exclusion Criteria:
- size of the FGG that the patient needs bigger than the size of FGGs that have to be harvested in this study (two 8mm (width) x 10mm (length) x ≈1.5mm (thickness) FGG).
- current heavy smokers(>10 cigarettes/day) (patients who stop smoking more than one year are eligible)
- have diabetes or other systemic diseases that may comprise healing
- take antibiotics and/or analgesics within one week before the procedure and have loss of sensation on the palate
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Allogenic amnion chorion membrane
Allogenic amnion chorion membrane (ACM) is a minimally manipulated allograft amnion chorion tissue for use as a wound covering in dental surgery.
|
Allogenic amnion chorion membrane (ACM) is a minimally manipulated allograft amnion chorion tissue for use as a wound covering in dental surgery.
|
|
Active Comparator: Collagen dressing
Collagen dressing is used to cover wounds in dental surgery.
|
Collagen dressing is used to cover wounds in dental surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: baseline
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
baseline
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 4 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
4 days
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 10 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
10 days
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 14 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
14 days
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 21 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
21 days
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 28 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
28 days
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 45 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
45 days
|
|
Size of Wound Area
Time Frame: 60 days
|
The wound area will be assessed by means of a clinical picture.
The picture will be taken with an angulation perpendicular to the wound.
A periodontal probe will be placed by the wound as a reference scale.
Wound area is defined as the area without epithelization.
The wound area on the picture will be measured by ImageJ.
|
60 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: baseline
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
baseline
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 4 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
4 days
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
10 days
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
14 days
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
21 days
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
28 days
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 45 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
45 days
|
|
Number of Participants Stratified as Per the Degree of Epithelialization of Wound
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Epithelialization is measured by means of bubble formation after dripping hydrogen peroxide (3%) to the wound surface.
Less bubbles indicate greater epithelialization, and epithelialization will be ranked as total, partial or none.
|
60 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: baseline
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
baseline
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 4 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
4 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 10 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
10 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 14 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
14 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 21 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
21 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 28 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
28 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 45 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
45 days
|
|
Relative Difference in Color of Wound Site Compared to Adjacent Gingiva
Time Frame: 60 days
|
The color of wound site will be compared to the adjacent gingiva by using a 4-point scale: 1. Obvious difference; 2. Noticeable difference; 3. Disguisable difference; or 4. No noticeable difference in comparison with adjacent gingiva.
|
60 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: baseline
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
baseline
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 4 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
4 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
10 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
14 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
21 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
28 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 45 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
45 days
|
|
Number of Participants With Haemostasis of Wound Area
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Haemostasis is achieved when no bleeding of the wound site is actively seen.
|
60 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
baseline
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 4 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
4 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
10 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
14 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
21 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
28 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 45 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
45 days
|
|
Pain as Assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Pain will be assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Scores range form 0 to 10. 0 indicates no pain, 1 indicates minimal pain, and 10 indicates severe pain.
|
60 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensitivity based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
baseline
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 4 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
4 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
10 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
14 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 21 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
21 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 28 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
28 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 45 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
45 days
|
|
Sensibility of the Wound Area as Indicated by Number of Participants Who Lost Sensation as Assessed by a 3-point Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Sensibility will be assessed with a periodontal probe using a rubbing movement and pin-pressure nociception.
Patients will be asked to rate their sensibility based on a 3-point verbal descriptor scale (VDS): no loss of sensation, mild/moderate loss of sensation, or severe loss of sensation.
|
60 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: baseline
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
baseline
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 4 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
4 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 10 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
10 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 14 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
14 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 21 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
21 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 28 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
28 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 45 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
45 days
|
|
Volume of Wound
Time Frame: 60 days
|
The wound area will analyzed with an intraoral scanner, and three-dimensional images will be reconstructed to determine the volume of the wound.
|
60 days
|
|
Clinician's Feedback on the Wound Dressing Material as Assessed by a Questionnaire
Time Frame: at the time of placement of the wound dressing material
|
at the time of placement of the wound dressing material
|
|
|
Number of Neutrophil Cells as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: baseline
|
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested.
The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope.
|
baseline
|
|
Number of Neutrophil Cells as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested.
The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope.
|
10 days
|
|
Change in Percentage of Collagen Density in Wound Area as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Masson's Trichrome-stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: baseline, 10 days
|
baseline, 10 days
|
|
|
Thickness of the Epithelium as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: baseline
|
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested.
The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope, and Nikon NIS-Elements Advanced Research (AR) Imagine Software will be used to calculate the thickness of the epithelium.
|
baseline
|
|
Thickness of the Epithelium as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-Stained Biopsy Sections
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested.
The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope, and Nikon NIS-Elements Advanced Research (AR) Imagine Software will be used to calculate the thickness of the epithelium.
|
10 days
|
|
Angiogenesis as Indicated by Number of Blood Vessels as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Biopsy Sections Immunohistochemically Stained to Detect Factor VIII (Von Willebrandt Factor)
Time Frame: baseline
|
baseline
|
|
|
Angiogenesis as Indicated by Number of Blood Vessels as Assessed by Light Microscopy of Biopsy Sections Immunohistochemically Stained to Detect Factor VIII (Von Willebrandt Factor)
Time Frame: 10 days
|
Gingival specimen biopsies (4mm in diameter, 1.5mm in thickness) will be harvested.
The histological sections will be evaluated using a Nikon light microscope, and the area of angiogenesis will be quantified using Nikon NIS Element AR Imagine Software.
|
10 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Chun-Teh Lee, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 3, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 17, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
January 17, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 17, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 17, 2018
First Posted (Actual)
October 19, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 19, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 17, 2021
Last Verified
December 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-DB-18-0303
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Palatal Wound
-
University of MilanFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore PoliclinicoCompletedPalatal Wound | Palatal Donor Site Wound HealingItaly
-
Abant Izzet Baysal UniversityCompleted
-
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita...Unknown
-
University of CagliariCompleted
-
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita...Unknown
-
King Abdullah University HospitalJordan University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingWound Healing | Palatal Wound | Inflammatory Cytokines | Donor Site ComplicationJordan
-
British University In EgyptCompleted
-
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita...Completed
-
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita...Completed
-
UPECLIN HC FM Botucatu UnespCompleted
Clinical Trials on Allogenic amnion chorion membrane
-
Loma Linda UniversityMaxxeusNot yet recruiting
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreNot yet recruiting
-
Hams Hamed AbdelrahmanRecruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityActive, not recruitingBadly Broken Maxillary Premolars Indicated for Extraction | Badly Broken Down Vital TeethEgypt
-
Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)CompletedPain, Postoperative | Gingival DiseasesUnited States
-
Minia UniversityCompletedGingival Recession, LocalizedEgypt
-
MiMedx Group, Inc.TerminatedPharynx Cancer | Larynx Cancer | Pharyngocutaneous FistulaUnited States
-
Applied Biologics, LLCUnknownOsteoarthritis, KneeUnited States
-
MiMedx Group, Inc.TerminatedTreatment of Partial Thickness BurnsUnited States
-
MiMedx Group, Inc.CompletedKidney Cancer | Partial Nephrectomy | Renal Function AggravatedUnited States