Effect of Using Placental Membranes on Healing and Post-op Pain After Gum Surgery

February 12, 2025 updated by: Chia-Yu Chen, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Wound Healing Following Palatal Graft Harvest Using Two Surgical Protocols - a Pilot Study

When harvesting autogenous free grafts to treat periodontal conditions (e.g., lack of attached keratinized tissue, ridge defects, and other mucogingival deformities), the hard palate is the preferred donor site. The primary disadvantage of this technique is the creation of a second surgical site. This sacrificial traumatic lesion on the palate is associated with significant post-operative morbidities, including patient discomfort, infection, inflammation, hemorrhage, and necrosis.

A pilot, blinded Randomized Control Trial will be conducted with subjects who are treatment planned to receive free gingival graft palatal harvest surgery. The palatal wound donor site for treatment group 1 will not receive an allograft membrane; while the donor site for treatment group 2 will receive an amnion-chorion allograft membrane (BioXclude) secured with a suture.

The severity of pain at the palatal wound site will be assessed using an at home survey (Visual Analog Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, & Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scale). The healing of the palatal donor site will be evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively (PVS impression, optical scan, endoscopy, and ultrasnonography).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02120
        • Harvard School of Dental Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients age 18 and above
  • No reported systemic disease that would compromise healing, such as Diabetes with A1c level >7.0%, endocrine disorders, hypertension above Stage II based on AHA 2017, osteoporosis, or immunodeficiency
  • Healthy periodontium or demonstrating stable periodontal condition following conventional periodontal therapy.
  • Clinical indication for periodontal mucogingival surgery utilizing palatal graft harvest e.g., shallow palatal vaults classified by Reiser et al. (1996) the average distance as 7 mm from the CEJ of maxillary teeth to the neurovascular bundle
  • No history of previous palatal harvesting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Smoker
  • Pregnancy [confirmed via patient self-identification]
  • Systemic condition requiring antibiotic prophylaxis prior to any invasive procedure. The list of such conditions includes:

    1. Prosthetic cardiac valves, including transcatheter-implanted prostheses and homografts
    2. Prosthetic material used for cardiac valve repair, such as annuloplasty rings and chords.
    3. Previous infective endocarditis
    4. Unrepaired cyanotic congenital heart disease or repaired congenital heart disease, with residual shunts or valvular regurgitation at the site of or adjacent to the site of a prosthetic patch or prosthetic device.
    5. Cardiac transplant with valve regurgitation due to a structurally abnormal valve.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease e.g., Diabetes with A1c level > 7.0% endocrine disorders, hypertension above Stage II based on AHA 2017, osteoporosis, or immunodeficiency)
  • Use of medications, such as Dilantin (aka Phenytoin), Cyclosporin, and Nifedipin, that would adversely affect periodontal tissues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Sutures
Patients assigned to Sutures group will not have the allograft placed on the donor site. One current clinical standard of practice is to place sutures on donor site. Patients assigned to Sutures group will have sutures placed on donor site.
Sutures (e.g. interrupted, crisscross compression) to be placed on palate
Experimental: Allograft and Sutures
Patients assigned to Allograft and Sutures will have allograft placed and secured with sutures on the donor site.
allograft to be placed on palate
Other Names:
  • BioXclude

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain as evaluated by subjects using the Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 60 days

The primary purpose of this study is to determine patient-reported outcome measures (i.e., pain) during the immediate post-operative period (i.e., 60 days). The Visual Analogue Scale survey will be completed by the patients during clinical visits and remotely.

The scale ranges from a score of 0 to 10, with a higher score corresponding to more severe pain experienced post-op.

60 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wound volumetric changes
Time Frame: 60 days
At the time of the procedure and post-op days 14 and 60, a research team member will administer the survey, take an impression, endoscopic image, ultrasonography, photograph the surgical site, and collect extra measurements, probing depth (PD), recession (REC), & clinical attachment level (CAL), of the participants' mouth. These records will combined to report volumetric changes of donor site in mm^3.
60 days
Patient satisfaction as evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 60 days
The secondary purpose of this study is to determine patient-reported outcome measures (i.e., satisfaction) during the immediate post-operative period (i.e., 60 days). The Visual Analogue Scale survey will be completed by the patients during clinical visits and remotely. The scale ranges from 0 to 10, with a higher score corresponding to a higher degree of satisfaction.
60 days
Pain management (medication usage)
Time Frame: 60 days
The secondary purpose of this study is to determine patient-reported outcome measures (i.e., medication usage) during the immediate post-operative period (i.e., 60 days). The survey will be completed during clinical visits and remotely. The survey will ask the following: "Did you take any medications for pain management of the palatal wound site? What medications & how much?"
60 days
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: 60 days
In order to address the subject nature of pain, subjects will be administered the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in the survey (completed during clinical visits and remotely). Each answer choice will be assigned a number, with a higher number reflecting a higher degree of pain experience ("Not at all" is 0; "All the time" is 4). A total score will be calculated as the sum of all answer choices. Total score ranges from 0 to 52, with a higher score corresponding to higher frequency of feelings and thoughts related to pain.
60 days
• Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference - Short Form 8a
Time Frame: 60 days
In order to address the subject nature of pain, subjects will be administered the PROMIS pain interference form in the survey (completed during clinical visits and remotely). Each answer choice will be assigned a number, with a higher number reflecting a higher degree of pain interference ("Not at all" is 0; "Very much" is 4). A total score will be calculated as the sum of all answer choices. Total score ranges from 0 to 32, with a higher score corresponding to a higher degree of pain interference.
60 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Postoperative

Clinical Trials on Sutures

Subscribe