Accuscreen Equipment Evaluation For Newborn Hearing Screening

November 6, 2019 updated by: Julie Dawson

Equipment Evaluation for Newborn Hearing Screening. A Randomised Comparison of Screen Outcome Between Standard Madsen 'Accuscreen New' and Madsen 'Accuscreen New' With Fast Refer Disabled and Increased Test Time

An evaluation and comparison of results between the 'Accuscreen New' currently in use and an 'Accuscreen New' with different settings to see if the new settings reduce unnecessary referrals for babies from newborn hearing screening.

Babies will be tested with the standard and modified equipment. Referrals for diagnostic testing will be based on the standard equipment. A comparison in referrals between the standard and modified equipment will be made.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

All newborn babies undergo hearing screening, usually within the first few days of life and some are tested with the automated auditory brainstem response test (AABR). This involves recording activity from the hearing nerve and parts of the brainstem from three small sensors placed on the baby's head and neck when a series of clicking sounds are played in to the ear.

In March 2015 we started using an 'Accuscreen New' to record the AABR, which is approved by the Newborn Hearing Screening Programme (NHSP) and used widely across the UK. However, since introducing the new equipment the 'screen refer' rate increased significantly in very young babies (less than 48 hours old) and diagnostic testing showed they had satisfactory hearing. The impact of the increased referral rate caused increased delays on diagnostic testing and also lead to unnecessarily increased parental anxiety in relation to the hearing of their new born baby.

The equipment suppliers (GN Otometrics) and the NHSP Programme centre have agreed to an evaluation and comparison of results between the 'Accuscreen New' currently in use and an 'Accuscreen New' with different settings which we believe will reduce unnecessary referrals of so many young babies to Audiology (the modified equipment will test for up to 10 minutes to see if a response is present, instead of stopping after one or two minutes).

Babies will be tested with the standard and modified equipment. Referrals for diagnostic testing will be based on the standard equipment. A comparison in referrals between the standard and modified equipment will be made.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Norfolk
      • Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom, NR4 7UY
        • Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 4 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Babies undergoing newborn hearing screening

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Babies requiring AABR testing through newborn hearing screening

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Screen pass or screen refer
Time Frame: within 48 hours of birth
The referral rate is the number of babies who do not pass the newborn hearing screen.
within 48 hours of birth

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Julie Dawson

Collaborators

University of East Anglia
GN Otometrics

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Fitzgerald, BSc (Hons), Consultant Audiologist

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 214416

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Cambodia

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe