Preventing Violence by Teachers (ICC-T_Tz)

January 26, 2021 updated by: Tobias Hecker, PhD, Bielefeld University

Reducing Violent Discipline in School Settings Using Interaction Competencies With Children for Teachers (ICC-T): A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Tanzanian Public Primary Schools

Brief Summary:

Violence against children is regarded as a key contributor to poverty and damages lifetime prospects for children in disadvantaged communities. However, physical violence is legally accepted as a disciplinary measure in schools in 68 states worldwide. For example, in Tanzania, corporal punishment is still lawful at school. It is thus not surprising that recently very high rates of violence (~90%) were found at secondary schools. For children of primary school age, no such information is available from representative samples to date.

Moreover, in recent studies teachers often report having to resort to violent disciplinary methods referring to a lack of nonviolent disciplinary alternatives . However, only few interventions that aim at equipping teachers with non-violent action alternatives in Sub-Saharan Africa have been implemented, and even fewer have been scientifically evaluated.

Thus, in this study the investigators will implement and assess the efficacy of an intervention aimed at reducing the use of harsh and violent disciplinary measures in schools. Interaction Competencies with Children - for Teacher (ICC-T) aims to enable teachers to use non-violent disciplinary measures and to strengthen their competencies in non-violent interactions. Previously its feasibility and efficacy were proven in secondary schools in Tanzania. The present study aims to adapt ICC-T to, and evaluate its efficacy on, primary school level. The training is expected to improve the teacher-student relationships, change teacher's attitudes towards corporal punishment and their use of violent disciplinary measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Sampling will be based on a matched cluster randomized controlled trial design. Study participants (i.e. students, teachers) will be recruited from 6 regions in Tanzania. In each region two primary schools from different districts will be included. From each school 80 pupils and minimum 20 teachers will be recruited. The final sample will comprise 960 pupils in the age-range between 9 and 12 years and at least 240 teachers from 12 different primary schools.

From each region one primary schools will be randomly allocated to the intervention group (that will receive the ICC-T intervention training) and the control group (that will receive no training). The study will have two data assessment points: baseline assessment prior to the intervention and follow-up assessment three months after the intervention. In addition, feasibility data will be assessed in the intervention group at the beginning and the end of the intervention.

Study measures will cover the following topics: socio-demographic data, common disciplinary measure used at school, attitudes towards violent discipline measures, students' mental health problems.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

914

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
        • Dar es Salaam University College of Education

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 65 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Written informed consent (if underaged by parents & minors)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Acute drug or alcohol intoxication

    • Acute psychotic disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ICC-T
Interactions Competencies with Children - for Teachers (ICC-T) 5.5 days with 8 hours of training for teachers. Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting
Core training components include teacher-student interaction, maltreatment prevention, effective discipline strategies, identifying and supporting burdened students and implementation of the training materials into the school setting.
No Intervention: Control
The control schools do not receive any intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of teachers' use of emotional and physical violence
Time Frame: - The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention).
- The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will be used to assess teachers' use of emotional and physical violent discipline measures against students. Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by teachers. We hypothesize a stronger change of the use of violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
- The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention).
Change of student's exposure to emotional and physical violence by teachers
Time Frame: - The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention
- The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) will assess the students' self-reported experiences of emotional and physical violence by teachers at school. Higher scores indicate higher levels of violence that is used by teachers. We hypothesize a stronger change of exposure to violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
- The CTS will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of student's mental health
Time Frame: - The SDQ will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)
- The Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) will assess students' internalizing and externalizing problems. Higher scores indicate higher levels of students' mental health problems. We hypothesize a stronger change of mental health problems in the intervention group compared to the control group.
- The SDQ will be used at T1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)
Change of teachers' attitudes towards emotional and physical violence
Time Frame: - The adapted version of CTS will be used at T 1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)
- Teacher's attitudes towards emotional and physical violence will be assessed with an adapted version of the Conflict Tactic Scale (CTS). Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive attitudes towards violence. We hypothesize a stronger change of positive attitudes towards violence in the intervention group compared to the control group.
- The adapted version of CTS will be used at T 1 (baseline, prior to intervention) and T2 (follow-up, 3 months after intervention)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tobias Hecker, PhD, Bielefeld University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 8, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ICC-T-Primary-Tz-2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe