Study of the Metrological Properties of Two Assessment Grids of the Driving Capacity After a Cerebrovascular Accident (ROADTRIP) (ROADTRIP)

April 6, 2021 updated by: University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study of the Metrological Properties of Two Assessment Grids of the Driving Capacity After a Cerebrovascular Accident :Recommendations of the HAS (Hight Autority of Health in France) and Test Ride for Investigation Practical Fitness to Drive

Precise recommendations concerning the methods of evaluation for the resumption of the driving after a not evolutionary stroke were recommended recently by the High Authority of Health. These describe among others elements to be estimated during the test on the road, in the presence of the driving instructor who remains Gold standard.

However, no standardized assessment grid serving as decision-making tool is at present validated.

Actually the test made by the unit of evaluation of the automobile resumption of the university hospital on the road, in a car of apprenticeship with double pedals and in the presence of a professional binomial (driving instructor and occupational therapist) then validated by the opinion of the doctor of the service. The current standard is thus very subjective and lack of sensibility.

It is necessary to study the metrological properties of both available assessment grids (that established from the recommendations of the HAS and TRIP), none of them reached a level of validation enough in this population.

The TRIP is this day validated only at the elderly people. The hypothesis of the search is an insufficiency of TRIP to estimate the patients presenting aftereffects of cerebrovascular accident.

The main objective of this work is to validate the new assessment grid after a study of its metrological properties in the situation of the driving on the road.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Detailed Description

The patients will benefit a medical consultation to estimate the possibility of inclusion in the study. During this consultation, the results of the neuropsychological and ophthalmological examinations will be explored and a specificity of the sensitive-driving deficits presented by the patient will be estimated to recommend the arrangements of necessary vehicle if necessary.

All the inclusive patients will benefit then the first test of driving in "ecological" situation accompanied by a lasting driving instructor during 45minutes. The evaluation will be realized by a present occupational therapist and a neuropsychologist in the vehicle, on two different assessment grids.

The second test on road will be for the part of included patients and will be made with the driving instructor and the therapist.

Then, the third test on road will be realized after sessions on driving simulator for the part of the patients requiring a re-entrainment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63000
        • Chu Clermont-Ferrand

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 Years to 80 Years
  • Cognitive and/or sensitive-motor disorders after a cerebrovascular accident
  • Candidate for resumption of driving on the road and having to pass an aptitude test
  • French legal protection

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for resumption of driving on the road (visual field amputation, binocular visual acuity less than 5/10; cognitive impairment not compatible with driving; other medical contraindication).
  • Protected populations not concerned by the study (guardianship, curatorship, deprived of the freedoms, safeguarding of justice).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Behavoiral
The evaluation will be realized on two different assessment grids during the test on the road

The data assessed during the road test from the two assessment grids (recommendations of the HAS and Test ride for investigation practical fitness to drive) :

road position, vehicle control, track management, safety distances, speed, visual behavior, traffic signs, vehicle overtaking, anticipatory reactions and capabilities adaptation, attentional skills, decision-making, communication with other road users, assessment of specific situations such as insertion on a 2x2 lane, mechanical management and general impressions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The metrologic properties of the two evaluation grids (evaluation grids based on HAS and TRIP recommendations)
Time Frame: at day 1
Acceptability will be based on the calculation of missing data at the level of each item and for the overall score of the study grids. Internal Consistency will be determined through Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Internal validity will be determined by study of correlation between the domains composing of the HAS and TRIP grids. Reproducibility .the Kappa concordance correlation coefficient will be used to determine the test-retest reliability. Internal validity will be determined by study of the correlation between of HAS and TRIP grids. External validity will be based on the study of correlations of scores from HAS and TRIP grids (Pearson or Spearman according to statistical distribution).
at day 1
The metrologic properties of the two evaluation grids (evaluation grids based on HAS and TRIP recommendations)
Time Frame: at 1 month
Acceptability will be based on the calculation of missing data at the level of each item and for the overall score of the study grids. Internal Consistency will be determined through Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Internal validity will be determined by study of correlation between the domains composing of the HAS and TRIP grids. Reproducibility .the Kappa concordance correlation coefficient will be used to determine the test-retest reliability. Internal validity will be determined by study of the correlation between of HAS and TRIP grids. External validity will be based on the study of correlations of scores from HAS and TRIP grids (Pearson or Spearman according to statistical distribution).
at 1 month
The metrologic properties of the two evaluation grids (evaluation grids based on HAS and TRIP recommendations)
Time Frame: at 3 months
Acceptability will be based on the calculation of missing data at the level of each item and for the overall score of the study grids. Internal Consistency will be determined through Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Internal validity will be determined by study of correlation between the domains composing of the HAS and TRIP grids. Reproducibility .the Kappa concordance correlation coefficient will be used to determine the test-retest reliability. Internal validity will be determined by study of the correlation between of HAS and TRIP grids. External validity will be based on the study of correlations of scores from HAS and TRIP grids (Pearson or Spearman according to statistical distribution).
at 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The sensitivity to change
Time Frame: at 3 months
The ability of the instrument to highlight a variation deemed relevant by experts, will be explored. The analyses described above for the tests-retest comparisons analyses will be re-implemented, the calculation of the effect-size will be performed for each grid
at 3 months
The sensitivity to change
Time Frame: at day 1
The ability of the instrument to highlight a variation deemed relevant by experts, will be explored. The analyses described above for the tests-retest comparisons analyses will be re-implemented, the calculation of the effect-size will be performed for each grid
at day 1
The sensitivity to change
Time Frame: at 1 month
The ability of the instrument to highlight a variation deemed relevant by experts, will be explored. The analyses described above for the tests-retest comparisons analyses will be re-implemented, the calculation of the effect-size will be performed for each grid
at 1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylvie Bardoux, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 4, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 4, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AOI 2016 BARDOUX
  • 2017-A02276-47 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on On-road driving evaluation

Subscribe