Effectiveness of a Personalized Health Profile on Specificity of Self-Management Goals

November 21, 2019 updated by: Nancy Mayo, McGill University

Effectiveness of a Personalized Health Profile on Specificity of Self-Management Goals Among People Living With HIV in Canada: A Blinded Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

With a growing number of people living with chronic diseases, the need to empower people for self-management is rising. A key element in self-management is goal setting but the extent to which meaningful actionable goals (i.e., SMART) can be set without direction from the health care team is not known. Providing people with specific feedback on actionable health outcomes may stimulate the setting of specific goals. To this end, a health outcome profile was computer generated from the existing outcome measures, at first and last recorded visits, of each person enrolled in the Positive Brain Health Now (+BHN) cohort from 5 sites in Canada. This profile will be tested with BHN participants who agreed to enrolled in sub-studies. The main outcome will be the extent to which goals are SMART by using specific words and actionable verbs. A measurement framework and an initial lexical (i.e., collection of vocabularies) has been developed for the goal evaluation. Using text mining techniques (i.e., tokenizing and pos-tagging), the specific components of each goal will be extracted and compared to the lexical using regular expression algorithms. The result will provide information on the specificity of participants' defined goals.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Introduction: With a growing number of people living with chronic diseases, the need to empower people to self-manage their condition is rising. A key element in self-management is goal setting, however, it is not known to what extent people living with chronic conditions are capable of setting their own actionable health-related goals. One possible strategy to improve goal-setting skills is to provide people with specific information about their health profile to stimulate the setting of specific goals. This study contributes to the understanding of the specificity of patient-formulated self-management goals by testing the effectiveness of providing feedback using a personalized health outcome profile.

Objective: To estimate among people living with HIV, to what extent providing feedback on their health outcomes, compared to no feedback, will affect number and specificity of person-defined self-management goals.

Design: A blinded, stratified, randomized controlled trial design will be conducted targeting all participants in the BHN2 (Action for Positive Brain Health Now) cohort in Canada.

Methods: A personalized health outcome profile has been produced for each person enrolled in the BHN1 cohort (Positive Brain Health Now) at cohort entry and at the last recorded visit. The same profile will be developed for the participants who will enroll in the BHN2 as they go through their visits. The profile covers information on brain health outcomes, health and quality of life ratings, and lifestyle factors. Participants from the BHN1 who agreed to enroll in the BHN2 as well as the new participants will be contacted. The intervention group will receive their personal profile along with instructions on goal-setting and tips to improve brain health; the control group will receive only the goal-setting instructions and tips. Over 800 members of the BHN cohort have sufficient data to generate the profile and will be recruited into the study. Persons will be instructed to enter their goals on a specialized web-based goal setting platform within 2 weeks of receiving their profile. At the close of the two-week period, the control group will receive their profile. Text mining techniques will be used to extract information from the person-defined goals and the specificity of the goal will be scored based on word matches to a developed goal-setting lexical.

Expected Results: The expectation is that the intervention group will set more goals and have more words matching the developed lexical than the control group. The total number of words per person-goal will be calculated for each group and Poisson regression will be used to estimate the rate ratio and 95% confidence intervals and compare rate ratios between men and women using an interaction term.

Conclusion: The effect of providing outcome feedback on setting effective self-management goals will be tested in this study. The results will provide a thorough understanding of the quality of person-defined goals using text mining. Moreover, this study provides evidence necessary for future studies using text mining as an inexpensive and timely way for evaluation of textual information.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

420

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • CHUM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

35 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

This study is a sub-study under the BHN trial. Eligibility criteria for the main BHN trial includes:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults age ≥ 35 who have been diagnosed as HIV positive for at least one year, - able to communicate adequately in French or English,
  • and able to give an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • dementia,
  • life expectancy of <3 years or other,
  • non-HIV-related neurological disorder,
  • known active central nervous system opportunistic infection or hepatitis C requiring Interferon treatment,
  • known Psychotic disorder,
  • current (within the past 12 months) substance dependence or abuse.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dashboard group
The intervention group will receive their personal profile via this e-mail along with instructions on goal-setting and tips to improve brain health.
The intervention of this study is grounded in the knowledge-to-action framework (Graham et al., 2006) and consists of providing feedback by sending participants their personalized health outcome profiles. As mentioned above, the context of our study is the BHN cohort. For all participants enrolled in the parent study, data on wide spectrum of health outcomes have been gathered. As part of the knowledge translation plan, a personalized profile of specific modifiable health outcomes called as "My Personalized Brain Health Profile" has been created for each participant (Appendix B). The profile covers information on brain health outcomes, health and quality of life ratings, and lifestyle factors.
No Intervention: No Dashboard group
The control group will receive only the goal-setting instructions and tips.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Goal specificity
Time Frame: "4 weeks" in total for each participant
The main outcome in this study is the specificity of self-management goals. For goal specificity, text mining techniques will be used. This outcome will be reported as a time-independent discrete variable - number of specific words (matched to a developed lexical) per person-goals.
"4 weeks" in total for each participant
Number of self-management goals
Time Frame: "4 weeks" in total for each participant
For this outcome number of goals per person as well as total number of goals per group will be reported.
"4 weeks" in total for each participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ABHN_Goals

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Disease

Clinical Trials on My Personal Brain Health Dashboard

3
Subscribe