Pilot Study to Evaluate "Intégrer et Accompagner Les Consommations d'Alcool!" (IACA!)'s Impact and Transferability (VITAE)

February 15, 2022 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Pilot Study to Evaluate Impact and Transferability of an Alcohol Focused Harm Reduction Support System Based on Mental Health Recovery Named IACA!

In France, alcohol consumption is the second most common cause of so-called preventable cancers after tobacco. Since 2014, in the "Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur" (PACA) region, the association Santé! has been developing an innovative intervention to support people suffering from alcohol-related addiction. This intervention, called IACA! must therefore be evaluated on a larger scale before conclusions about its effectiveness can be drawn from a comparative trial.

This evaluation requires significant human and material resources. It is therefore recommended to first assess the transferability of IACA! in other care centers in a pilot study.

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Detailed Description

In France, 11% of cancers in men and 4.5% of cancers in women are attributed to alcohol consumption. It is the second leading cause of so-called preventable cancers, accounting for 28,000 alcohol-related cancers out of 352,000 new cases of cancer affecting annually adults (over 30 years of age). Overall, alcohol is among the top 3 factors contributing to Disability-Adjusted life year (DALYs) in France in 2017. Some cancer risks can be quantified as early as one drink a day (oesophagus, oral cavity, pharynx and breast in women). However, the risks associated with alcohol consumption remain influenced by the quantities consumed. There is therefore an interest, particularly for consumers of the largest quantities, in reducing the quantities consumed. In Europe, while people who drink more than 60 g/d of alcohol for men and 40 g/d for women are estimated to represent only 16.1% of the population for men and 9.3% for women, they represent 87% and 82% of alcohol-related morbidity and mortality respectively. Subjects with addiction (or substance use disorders) have an increased risk of social harm (1.5 to 3 times that of alcohol users without addiction), a higher mortality (1.4 to 6.5 compared to the general population) with a life expectancy of 9 to 20 years shorter than that of the general population. Moreover, even if the quantities consumed are not a valid individual diagnostic criterion, studies show a strong association between the quantity consumed and the diagnosis of addiction. Finally, some studies suggest that the prevalence of secondary harm from alcohol use follows an exponential curve as a function of alcohol consumption.

Since 2014, in the PACA region, the association Santé! has been developing an intervention to support people suffering from alcohol-related addiction. This intervention, called IACA! (Integrating and supporting alcohol consumption), differs from the support provided during rehabilitation cures and aims to: fight against discrimination and exclusion of people who drink alcohol, re-engage these individuals in the care process (because they have generally left it) by using the appropriate levers, promote well-being, improve quality of life and recovery and support the recovery in control of consumption. Thus, IACA!, through its philosophy and implementation, is based both on the risk reduction approach historically deployed with drug users and on the recovery approach, developed in the field of mental health. The first one-year results of this program were promising since, of 17 people who received the intervention, all had a social or health benefit, 13 of whom were associated with stabilization (n=4), reduction (n=7) or cessation (n=2) of alcohol use.

These promising results must therefore be evaluated on a larger scale before conclusions about its effectiveness can be drawn from a comparative trial. This type of evaluation requires significant human and material resources. It is therefore recommended to first assess in the field: 1) the conditions under which such an intervention is deployed in other centres (adaptations implemented by other centres to deploy IACA! for example, without distorting the intervention), 2) the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention in other centres (are the human and material resources on site sufficient for the successful deployment of the intervention?), 3) the acceptability and feasibility of the large-scale evaluation envisaged.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France
        • CH Perrens - Equipe Addiction
      • Bordeaux, France
        • MéRISP - Université U1219

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This research will investigate three types of populations:

  • Individuals receiving support from the IACA! Intervention (called beneficiaries),
  • Professionals implementing the IACA! Intervention i.e. the pairs in charge of accompanying the beneficiaries in the centers as well as the persons in charge of these centers,
  • Professionals from Santé! supporting the deployment of the IACA! intervention.

The beneficiaries are all persons integrating the program in the project's partner sites and consuming alcohol.

The professionals will be specialized educators, social workers, nurses, social and solidarity economy advisors, etc.

Description

Inclusion criteria common to the 3 populations:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • whatever the gender
  • Non-opposition to participate

Inclusion criteria for professionals from centers implementing IACA! :

Concerning professionals in contact with the patients:

  • Having been trained at IACA!
  • Working in the centers participating in the implementation of IACA!

Concerning the persons in charge of the centers :

These professionals are those who have participated in the deployment of the IACA! method in their centers

Criteria for the inclusion of health professionals ! Participating or having recently participated in the implementation of IACA!

Exclusion Criteria:

The beneficiaries will be excluded if they have a severe somatic or psychiatric pathology that is incompatible with understanding the assessment tools; difficulty understanding and/or writing French; if they are unreachable by telephone, if they are participating in another research project with an ongoing exclusion period, if they are placed under court protection and if they are pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Severity of alcohol use
Time Frame: 12 months after the start of IACA
12 months after the start of IACA

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Utility dimension of viability - alcohol consumption
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Average number of units of alcohol consumption in the past 30 days
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - alcohol consumption
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Average number of units of alcohol consumption in the past 30 days
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - alcohol consumption
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Average number of units of alcohol consumption in the past 30 days
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - alcohol consumption
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Average number of units of alcohol consumption in the past 30 days
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - alcohol consumption
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Average number of units of alcohol consumption in the past 30 days
12 months (M12)
Utility dimension of viability - craving
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Craving: average frequency and intensity in the last 30 days
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - craving
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Craving: average frequency and intensity in the last 30 days
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - craving
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Craving: average frequency and intensity in the last 30 days
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - craving
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Craving: average frequency and intensity in the last 30 days
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - craving
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Craving: average frequency and intensity in the last 30 days
12 months (M12)
Utility dimension of viability - severity
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Severity score for addictive substances and behaviors
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - severity
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Severity score for addictive substances and behaviors
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - severity
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Severity score for addictive substances and behaviors
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - severity
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Severity score for addictive substances and behaviors
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - severity
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Severity score for addictive substances and behaviors
12 months (M12)
Utility dimension of viability - disorders
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Presence of alcohol and other substance use disorders (past 12 months and past)
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - disorders
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Presence of alcohol and other substance use disorders (past 12 months and past)
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - disorders
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Presence of alcohol and other substance use disorders (past 12 months and past)
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - disorders
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Presence of alcohol and other substance use disorders (past 12 months and past)
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - disorders
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Presence of alcohol and other substance use disorders (past 12 months and past)
12 months (M12)
Utility dimension of viability - Other substances
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Number of days of use of other substances/behaviours in the past 30 days
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - Other substances
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Number of days of use of other substances/behaviours in the past 30 days
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - Other substances
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Number of days of use of other substances/behaviours in the past 30 days
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - Other substances
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Number of days of use of other substances/behaviours in the past 30 days
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - Other substances
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Number of days of use of other substances/behaviours in the past 30 days
12 months (M12)
Utility dimension of viability - Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Inventory of medical, psychosocial and psycho-educational contacts in the last 30 days
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - Inventory
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Inventory of medical, psychosocial and psycho-educational contacts in the last 30 days
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - Inventory
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Inventory of medical, psychosocial and psycho-educational contacts in the last 30 days
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - Inventory
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Inventory of medical, psychosocial and psycho-educational contacts in the last 30 days
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - Inventory
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Inventory of medical, psychosocial and psycho-educational contacts in the last 30 days
12 months (M12)
Utility dimension of viability - QoL
Time Frame: Baseline (M0)
Quality of life
Baseline (M0)
Utility dimension of viability - QoL
Time Frame: 3 months (M3)
Quality of life
3 months (M3)
Utility dimension of viability - QoL
Time Frame: 6 months (M6)
Quality of life
6 months (M6)
Utility dimension of viability - QoL
Time Frame: 9 months (M9)
Quality of life
9 months (M9)
Utility dimension of viability - QoL
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
Quality of life
12 months (M12)
Conditions of transferability
Time Frame: 9 to 12 months (M9 to M12)
Conditions of transferability linked to the characteristics of the stakeholders and the context: contextual conditions for success within the centres, the characteristics of professionals and patients influencing outcomes
9 to 12 months (M9 to M12)
Viability and implementation
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Implementation of IACA! (process, resources, activities) including the respect of IACA! success principles (skills, postures)
6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Viability and utility
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
"utility" dimension (as a complement to the secondary criteria) of viability through the recovery mechanisms identified as successful mental health recovery
6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Viability and affordability
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Affordability for professionals and beneficiaries (financial, geographical, social and cultural levers and brakes of the intervention)
6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Viability and evaluability
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Evaluability of IACA: carrying out this evaluation, the availability of professionals and beneficiaries to answer questionnaires and interviews, missing data in the questionnaires etc.
6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Viability and adaptability
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Adaptability of IACA! (integration of the action into the context and the current organisation of the centres)
6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Viability and acceptability
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Acceptability of IACA! by professionals and beneficiaries
6 to 12 months (M6 to M12)
Feasibility study capacity
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
The centres' capacity for inclusion (eligibility, recruitment rate, refusal rate)
12 months (M12)
Feasibility study complicance
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
The compliance rates; understanding, acceptability and feasibility of study questionnaires and data collection tools;
12 months (M12)
Feasibility study ressources
Time Frame: 12 months (M12)
The ressources required (time required to complete all study forms, professional/centre capacity, etc.)
12 months (M12)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Linda Cambon, PhD, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux University U1219
  • Study Director: François Alla, MD, PhD, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux University U1219
  • Study Director: Marc Auriacombe, MD, PhD, CNRS USR 3413 SANPSY, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux Hospital University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 16, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 16, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcoholism

Subscribe