Cognitive Training After Stroke : Effects and Mechanisms

June 11, 2021 updated by: Lars Tjelta Westlye, Oslo University Hospital

Kognitiv Trening Etter Hjerneslag: Effekter og Mekanismer #2015/1282

Stroke is a major cause of severe cognitive and physical disability. Despite the high and increasing incidence, and large health, economic, social and personal consequences, studies designed to remedy cognitive impairments and improve rehabilitation care following stroke are lacking. A promising line of research have shown that weak electrical current (tDCS) can be a safe, cost-effective, and potent treatment when combined with other rehablitational approaches.

The underlying mechanism is assumed that tDCS facilitates neuronal signaling, improving plasticity and facilitating rehablitational outcome. But further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms at hand, and to better evaluate the potential clinical utility.

The scope for the current project is to investigate both cognitive and neuronal effects of tDCS in combination with cognitive training , with the ultimate goal to improve current rehabilitational healthcare. To achieve this we will use multimodal MRI, EEG, and a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological asessment, to describe and evaluate the effect of tDCS in rehabilitation purposes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants are randomly assigned to either active or sham condition, using codes provided by the manufacturer and implemented by an in-house Matlab script, pseudo-randomizing participants while maintaining balance in groups of 20. tDCS stimulation is applied at six occasions for each participant, with a minimum of 48 hours between stimulations, aiming at an average of two stimulations per week. Stimulation current is1000 μA, stimulation time was 20 min for the active group with a ramp-up time of 120 s and fade-out time of 30 s. The current intensity is limited to 1 mA to limit the risk of adverse events due to the electrical stimulation. The sham stimulation consists of ramp-up followed by 40 s of active stimulation and then fade-out, following factory settings.

Cognitive training will be done by the computerized working memory training program (Cogmed Systems AB, Stockholm, Sweden) consisting of 25 online training sessions. In this study, to increase feasibility, we utilize 17 sessions over a period of three to four weeks, corresponding to approximately five weekly training sessions. On average, we aim at two training sessions combined with tDCS per week with a minimum of one day between each tDCS session. The remaining CCT sessions are performed at home.

Neuropsychological assessments and MRI assessments are conducted three times: at baseline 1, after a waiting period of 2-4 weeks (baseline 2, before intervention) and immediately post intervention. Self-reported symptoms of fatigue and depression are assessed at five time points, before, during and after completing intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo University Hospital
      • Oslo, Norway
        • Oslo University Hospital Ullevål

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- MR/CT revealing ischemic or hemorrhagic damage (stroke).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of illness or damage to the CNS, besides stroke.
  • <18 years of age
  • Extensive cognitive decline or dementia
  • Severe psychiatric disorders
  • Substance or alcohol abuse
  • Contraindications for MRI.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active stimulation
Participants recieving active trancranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Parameters: 20 minutes anodal tDCS 1mA. Two times a week, for three weeks. Anode placed at F3, cathode placed at right cerebellum.
Placebo Comparator: Sham stimulation
Participants recieving passive / sham trancranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) Two times a week, for three weeks. Anode placed at F3, cathode placed at right cerebellum.
Sham Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evidence of change in neural activity in attentional-related brain areas after receiving anodal tDCS, as measured with functional MRI
Time Frame: One and a half year
Change in activation patterns during multiple object tracking (MOT) at first baseline, before initiating training (second baseline, on average 4 weeks after baseline measure), and after a three-week intervention (post-intervention assessment)
One and a half year
Evidence of structural changes after receiving anodal tDCS, as measured with structural MRI
Time Frame: One and a half year
Structural MRI
One and a half year
Evidence of increased attentional and working memory capacity after receiving anodal tDCS
Time Frame: One and a half year
Rate of improvement in Cogmed tasks
One and a half year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evidence of increased attentional capacity after receiving anodal tDCS
Time Frame: One and a half year
Performance change in The Theory of Visual Attention (TVA) computerized paradigm.
One and a half year

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evidence of change in fatigue severity after receiving tDCS
Time Frame: One and a half year
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), a seven-point Likert scale on subjective fatigue severity/impact. 9 items scored from 1 (less symptoms) to 7 (most severe symptoms). Scores are reported as mean scores, lowest possible mean = 1, highest possible mean = 7.
One and a half year
Evidence of change in symptoms of depression after receiving tDCS
Time Frame: One and a half year
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), self-reported depressive symptoms. Scale consists of 9 items, scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). Scores are reported as sum scores, range 0 (less symptoms) - 27 (more symptoms)
One and a half year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lars T. Westlye, Ph.D, University of Oslo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 11, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Subscribe