Guiding Catheters in Endovascular Stroke Therapy - Are Balloon Guided Catheters Superior? (BEST)

March 13, 2026 updated by: Michael Breckwoldt, University Hospital Heidelberg

Sind Ballonassistierte Führungskatheter in Der Endovaskulären Schlaganfalltherapie Der Vorderen Zirkulation überlegen? (BEST-Studie) Guiding Catheters in Endovascular Stroke Therapy - Are Balloon Guided Catheters Superior?

The BEST study is an academically initiated, single-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the potential advantages and disadvantages of using a guide catheter with or without a balloon in the interventional treatment of acute ischemic stroke.

The study population consists of adult patients with acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation for whom interventional recanalization therapy via catheter is indicated following interdisciplinary consultation between the Department of Neurology and Neuroradiology at Heidelberg University Hospital.

In addition to routine clinical treatment measures and data collection, patients will be interviewed by telephone after 90 days to assess their quality of life and level of independence using standardized scoring systems.

All medical devices used or investigated in this study bear the CE mark (Conformité Européenne ) and will be used within their intended purpose. Study participants will not be subjected to any additional invasive or burdensome procedures beyond normal usage.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Are balloon guide catheters in endovascular stroke therapy of the anterior circulation superior? (BEST) Background Meta-analyses on the use of balloon-guided catheters (BGK) suggest a better technical and clinical outcome after endovascular stroke therapy (EST). However, no randomised controlled trials exist to support these results, yet.

Study objective To investigate whether usage of BGK for EST of anterior circulation ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion results in improved degree of recanalization of the target vessel and the associated vascular territory.

Study population N = 110 patients (55 per group, 1:1 randomisation) with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation and intention to treatment with EST.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation (internal carotid artery-T, M1 (segment of the middle cerebral artery) or proximal M2 (M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery) occlusion) proven by either computed tomography (CT) or magentic resonance imaging (MRI)
  2. Estimated time between stroke onset / last seen well and study procedure of < 24 hours
  3. No relevant pre-stroke functional disability (pre-morbid modified Rankin Sacle (mRS) of 0 - 3)
  4. Neurological deficit with a National Instutute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of ≥ 4 and ≤ 25
  5. Age ≥ 18
  6. Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≥ 6 on baseline non-contrast CT < 4,5h after onset or CT perfusion / MRI > 4,5h after onset

Exclusion criteria

  1. Pre-existing stenosis in the target vessel requiring stent therapy
  2. Tandem occlusions of both cervical and intracranial vessels
  3. Prior intracranial hemorrhage or signs of intracranial hemorrhage during procedure
  4. Notably increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage
  5. Excessive vascular tortuosity that will likely result in unstable access or inability to access the target vessel
  6. Dissection of the extra- or intracranial cerebral arteries
  7. Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  8. Known severe illness with life expectancy less than 6 months
  9. Participating in another clinical trial during the follow-up period that could confound the treatment or outcomes of this investigation

Intervention EST is performed with usage of either i) a BGK (Stryker MERCI 9F, Stryker Flowgate2 8F) or ii) a standard guide catheter without balloon (Cordis Vista Brite Tip 8F) Study design Mono-centric, prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with blinded endpoint evaluation (PROBE design) Clinical Site Location Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany Endpoints Primary endpoint: Proportion of patients with successful technical recanalisation (expanded treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score 2c/3) Secondary endpoint (selected): Clinical outcome after 90 days using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS); severity of stroke symptoms after 24h measured by National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS); Infarct Growth between baseline and first follow-up MRI measured by volume of lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging; volume and number of peripheral emboli on follow-up MRI measured on diffusion-weighted imaging; safety endpoints.

Participant duration 3 months Estimated Study duration 2-3 years

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Baden-Wurttemberg
      • Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany, 69120
        • University Hospital Heidelberg

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an acute ischemic stroke
  • Location of the primary occlusion in the anterior cerebral circulation
  • Pre-therapeutic modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 3.
  • Written informed consent from

    1. the patient or
    2. their legal representative/guardian or
    3. patient enrollment by an independent physician and the principal investigator

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindications to interventional therapy
  • Patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage
  • Pregnancy/Breastfeeding
  • Pre-therapeutic mRS > 3
  • National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ≤ 4
  • Patients detained in an institution by court or government order
  • Patients who require intubation for treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ballon guide catheter
Thrombectomy of an acute ischemic stroke using a balloon-guided catheter
Mechanical thrombectomy is an endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke caused by a large-vessel occlusion. It involves advancing a catheter, with or without a balloon usually via the femoral or radial artery, to the occluded intracranial artery and mechanically removing the thrombus using a stent retriever, aspiration device, or a combination of both.
Placebo Comparator: Guide catheter without balloon
Thrombectomy of an acute ischemic stroke using a guide catheter without balloon
Thrombectomy of acute ischemic stroke using a guide catheter without balloon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful recanalisation
Time Frame: up to day 1
expanded treatment in cerebral ischemia (eTICI) Score ≥2c eTICI Grades: grade 0: no perfusion noted (0% reperfusion) grade 1: reduction in thrombus but without any resultant filling of distal arterial branches grade 2A: reperfusion of 1-49% of the territory grade 2B50: reperfusion of 50-66% of the territory grade 2B67: reperfusion of 67-89% of the territory grade 2C: extensive reperfusion of 90-99% of the territory grade 3: complete or full reperfusion (100% reperfusion)
up to day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after treatment

The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is a 7-point ordinal scale used to measure the degree of disability or dependence in daily activities, most commonly after stroke.

0 - No symptoms.

  1. - No significant disability. Able to carry out all usual activities, despite some symptoms.
  2. - Slight disability. Able to look after own affairs without assistance, but unable to carry out all previous activities.
  3. - Moderate disability. Requires some help, but able to walk unassisted.
  4. - Moderately severe disability. Unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance, and unable to walk unassisted.
  5. - Severe disability. Requires constant nursing care and attention, bedridden, incontinent.
  6. - Dead.
Up to 90 days after treatment
24hr NIHSS
Time Frame: 24 Hours after treatment

The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a standardized clinical scoring system used to quantify neurological deficit in patients with acute stroke. It assesses level of consciousness, language, motor strength, sensory function, visual fields, coordination, and neglect.

Scores range from 0 (no deficit) to 42 (severe stroke), with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. NIHSS is widely used to guide acute treatment decisions, assess stroke severity, and predict clinical outcomes.

24 Hours after treatment
7d NIHSS
Time Frame: Up tp Day 7 after treatment

The NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is a standardized clinical scoring system used to quantify neurological deficit in patients with acute stroke. It assesses level of consciousness, language, motor strength, sensory function, visual fields, coordination, and neglect.

Scores range from 0 (no deficit) to 42 (severe stroke), with higher scores indicating greater neurological impairment. NIHSS is widely used to guide acute treatment decisions, assess stroke severity, and predict clinical outcomes.

Up tp Day 7 after treatment
Technical success
Time Frame: Periprocedural

The expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) score is an angiographic grading scale used to assess the degree of cerebral reperfusion after endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

It ranges from 0 (no reperfusion) to 3 (complete reperfusion), with intermediate grades reflecting increasing levels of partial reperfusion. The eTICI score is commonly used to evaluate the technical success of mechanical thrombectomy, with eTICI 2b-3 generally considered successful reperfusion.

eTICI Grades: grade 0: no perfusion noted (0% reperfusion) grade 1: reduction in thrombus but without any resultant filling of distal arterial branches grade 2A: reperfusion of 1-49% of the territory grade 2B50: reperfusion of 50-66% of the territory grade 2B67: reperfusion of 67-89% of the territory grade 2C: extensive reperfusion of 90-99% of the territory grade 3: complete or full reperfusion (100% reperfusion)

Periprocedural
First-Pass-Effekt, Number of Participants with reperfusion on first pass
Time Frame: Periprocedural

The First-Pass Effect (FPE) in mechanical thrombectomy describes the achievement of successful reperfusion after a single thrombectomy device pass, without the need for additional attempts.

It is typically defined as eTICI 2c or 3 reperfusion on the first pass. The First-Pass Effect is clinically relevant because it is associated with shorter procedure times, less endothelial injury, fewer complications, and better functional outcomes compared with reperfusion requiring multiple passes.

Periprocedural
Time to visualization
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Time interval between the start of thrombectomy and visualization of the occlusion, in minutes
Periprocedural
Time to first pass
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Time interval between the start of thrombectomy and the first recanalization maneuver, in minutes
Periprocedural
Time to success
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Time interval between the start of thrombectomy and successful recanalization defined as eTICI 2c or 3 reperfusion, in minutes
Periprocedural
Number of Passes
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Number of passes / manouvers done required to achieve recanalization or unsuccessful termination of treatment determined by treating physician
Periprocedural
Number of Participants with Distal emboli
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Embolization in previously unaffected territories during thrombectomy
Periprocedural
Infarct growth
Time Frame: up to 48 hours after treatment
Infarct growth between imaging before therapy and 24-48 hours after treatment
up to 48 hours after treatment
Number of emboli
Time Frame: Day 1 - 2
Number and volume of peripheral emboli (measured in diffusion-weighted imaging of the follow-up MRI examination)
Day 1 - 2

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: up to 90 days after treatment
Proportion of patients who died after 90 days
up to 90 days after treatment
ICH
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after treatment
Number of patients with intracranial hemorrhage
Up to 90 days after treatment
Procedural complications
Time Frame: Periprocedural
Number of procedural complications
Periprocedural

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael O Breckwoldt, MD, PhD, University Hospital Heidelberg
  • Study Director: Markus Möhlenbruch, MD, PhD, University Hospital Heidelberg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The IPD may not be shared since participants have not consented to secondary use or data sharing.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke

Clinical Trials on Ballon guide catheter

Subscribe