Evaluation and Intervention of Cognitive Function in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.

This study is a randomized controlled, single-center study of the cognitive function of diabetic patients in the Department of Endocrinology in our hospital. Through the collection of clinical data during the outpatient or hospitalization period, as well as the clinical data of follow-up at different times in the later period, the conclusion is drawn after statistical analysis. For the population who passed the observational study in the first part, patients who meet the conditions of intervention will be further screened to enter the intervention study in the second part. Patients with type 2 diabetes who meet the enrollment criteria and enter the second part are randomly divided into 3 groups according to 1:1:1; 1.Lifestyle intervention group; 2. Metformin treatment group; 3. Dapagliflozin treatment group; There are four groups with healthy control (no intervention). Follow-up review and blood samples were taken after 12 weeks respectively. After the first follow-up, follow-up can be extended to 24 weeks depending on the patient's wishes. Combined with the number of patients with diabetes in endocrinology department of our hospital in the past, and considering the nature of this study and other factors, 90 patients with type 2 diabetes and 30 healthy controls were included for research and analysis.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

A large amount of evidence indicates that diabetes (DM) is related to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), vascular dementia and Alzheimer disease (AD). Biological, clinical and epidemiological data all support the close link between diabetes and Alzheimer disease. AD and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have common pathological features, including inflammation, changes in insulin signaling, or vascular damage. Event-related potential (ERP) is a specific stimulus that acts on the sensory system or a certain part of the brain. When the stimulation is given or withdrawn, the potential change in the brain area is caused. It is suitable for the assessment of brain dysfunction, especially for the assessment of people with early subclinical disease states. Among them, P300 belongs to a kind of ERP, which is an endogenous special evoked potential related to cognitive function. It can identify and evaluate early changes in cognitive function. Therefore, it can be recognized in clinical neurological or psychiatric diseases. The change of cognitive function provides reliable objective indicators, which is of great significance for early drug intervention and treatment and improving the long-term quality of life of patients. Studies have found that anti-diabetic drugs can improve cognitive and memory impairment, and have a positive effect on mitochondrial and synaptic function, neuroinflammation and brain metabolism. Anti-diabetic drugs can be developed as the treatment of MCI and AD diseases in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Both basic and clinical trials have evidence that metformin has considerable potential for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction in T2DM. Basic experiments have confirmed that SGLT-2 inhibitors may improve the pathological state of AD, but the clinical evidence is still unclear. As the representative drug of SGLT-2, dapagliflozin, as the intervention drug in this study, focuses on its effect on improving the cognitive function of diabetic patients, and compares its effectiveness in improving cognitive function with metformin.

This study is a randomized controlled, single-center study of the cognitive function of diabetic patients in the Department of Endocrinology in our hospital. Through the collection of clinical data during the outpatient or hospitalization period, as well as the clinical data of follow-up at different times in the later period, the conclusion is drawn after statistical analysis. For the population who passed the observational study in the first part, patients who meet the conditions of intervention will be further screened to enter the intervention study in the second part. Patients with type 2 diabetes who meet the enrollment criteria and enter the second part are randomly divided into 3 groups according to 1:1:1;1.Lifestyle intervention group; 2. Metformin treatment group; 3. Dapagliflozin treatment group; There are four groups with healthy control (no intervention). Follow-up review and blood samples were taken after 12 weeks respectively. After the first follow-up, follow-up can be extended to 24 weeks depending on the patient's wishes. Combined with the number of patients with diabetes in endocrinology department of our hospital in the past, and considering the nature of this study and other factors, 90 patients with type 2 diabetes and 30 healthy controls were included for research and analysis.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. some patients with type 2 diabetes were observed and studied:

    • type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to the 1999 WHO standard and the course of disease was less than 1 year;
    • no hypoglycemic drugs were used or stopped for more than 12 weeks;
    • 40-60 years old (including both ends);
    • able to understand the procedures and methods of this study, willing to strictly abide by the clinical trial plan to complete the trial, and voluntarily signed the informed consent form.
  2. healthy controls were age, sex and weight matching:

    • 40-60 years old (including both ends);
    • normal blood glucose: fasting blood glucose<6.1mmol/l, postprandial 2-hour blood glucose <7.8mmol /l;
    • able to understand the procedures and methods of this study, willing to strictly abide by the clinical trial plan to complete this trial, and voluntarily signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactation;
  • acute complications (including DKA, hypertonic coma) not corrected;
  • history of cerebral hemorrhage and stroke;
  • other neurological and mental disorders that clearly affect cognitive function, such as anxiety, depression, AD, PD;
  • the New York Heart Association (NYHA) defines congestive heart failure as Class III or IV;
  • active liver disease and / or obvious abnormal liver function, defined as AST >2.5 times the normal upper limit and / or ALT>2.5 times the normal upper limit and / or total bilirubin > 1.5 times the normal upper limit;
  • moderate and severe renal insufficiency [using CKD-EPI formula to calculate eGFR<60ml/ (min*1.73m2)];
  • malignant tumor has not been cured;
  • AD family history (first-degree relatives such as parents, siblings, children, etc.). (10) Alcohol or drug abuse within 3 months, which, according to the researchers, may affect the participants' participation in the study or the status of the subjects, resulting in drug use or compliance during the trial (alcohol abuse is defined as alcohol intake of more than 15g a day for women and more than 25g for men (15g alcohol equals 450mL beer, 150mL wine or 50mL low spirits), more than twice a week);
  • long-term intravenous administration, oral administration and intra-articular administration of corticosteroids for more than 7 days within 2 months before screening;
  • patients with thyroid dysfunction with unstable treatment dose within 3 months (such as thiourea, thyroid hormones);
  • severe trauma or infection that may affect blood glucose control within 1 month;
  • patients with severe systemic diseases who were judged by the researchers to be unsuitable for enrollment;
  • conditions that other researchers considered inappropriate to participate in this clinical trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lifestyle intervention group
patients did not take any hypoglycemic drugs and adopted diet, exercise and other lifestyle intervention measures to control blood sugar.
patients did not take any hypoglycemic drugs and adopted diet, exercise and other lifestyle intervention measures to control blood sugar.
Experimental: Metformin treatment group
on the basis of lifestyle intervention, patients were given metformin 2-3 times a day (starting with 2times), 0.5g each time.
patients did not take any hypoglycemic drugs and adopted diet, exercise and other lifestyle intervention measures to control blood sugar.
Take it regularly for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Metformin Hydrochloride
Experimental: Dapagliflozin treatment group
on the basis of lifestyle intervention, patients took Dapagliflozin orally, once a day, 10mg at a time.
patients did not take any hypoglycemic drugs and adopted diet, exercise and other lifestyle intervention measures to control blood sugar.
Take it regularly for 12 weeks
Other Names:
  • Dapagliflozin 10Mg Tab
No Intervention: Healthy control group
no intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event-related potential (ERP)
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Event-related potential (ERP) is a potential change in a region of the brain caused by the addition of a specific stimulus to a specific part of the sensory system or brain when the stimulus is given or withdrawn. It is suitable for the assessment of cerebral dysfunction, especially for the population with early subclinical disease. Among them, P300 belongs to a kind of ERP, which is an endogenous special evoked potential related to cognitive function, and can recognize and evaluate the early changes of cognitive function, it can provide reliable and objective indexes for the change of cognitive function in clinical nerve or mental disease, and is of great significance for early drug intervention and improvement of patients'long-term quality of life.

The measurements of P300 include the determination of the latency and amplitude of N2, P3a and P3b.

12 weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) is a rapid screening tool for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) developed by Professor Nasreddine in 2004, the cognitive areas assessed included attention and concentration, executive function, memory, language, visual structure skills, abstract thinking, calculation and orientation. The total score of the scale was 30. The test result showed that the normal score was ≥26.
12 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE) includes the following seven aspects: time orientation, place orientation, immediate memory, attention and calculation, delayed memory, language, visual space. A total of 30 questions, the correct answer to each score of 1, wrong answer or do not know the score of 0, the total score of the scale ranges from 0 to 30. The test scores are closely related to the educational level, and the normal cut-off points are as follows: illiteracy>17 points, primary school>20 points, junior middle school and above>24 points.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glycated hemoglobin(HbA1c、GHb)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The concentration of glycosylated hemoglobin can effectively reflect the average blood glucose level in the past 8-12 weeks. After 12 weeks of intervention, the changes of glycosylated hemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes reflect the therapeutic effect, and the intervention measures are adjusted according to glycosylated hemoglobin.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 28, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe