The Effect of Pain Education on Chiropractic Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain

The Effect of Pain Education on Chiropractic Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain, Clinical Recommendations and Attitudes Towards People With Chronic Pain

Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide affecting just under 28 million people in the UK. Chronic pain conditions require a biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical model of care. Biomedical management lacks evidence of effectiveness but also has the potential to exacerbate the condition by raising fears and anxiety about potential pathological abnormalities.

Thus, the pre-registration phase is an important point where an individual's understanding of, and beliefs about, pain and people with pain may be shaped for the future. The need for improved and better education of healthcare professionals to support best practice for low back pain with the aim of integrating professionals' management of low back pain and fostering innovation in practice is well recognised. Pain education research with pre-registration chiropractors is lacking.

Therefore, this study aims to:

To compare the effect of two pain education intervention, through a multi-site randomised control trial, on the following three questionnaire based outcome measures:

1. Knowledge (understanding) of chronic pain
2. Attitudes towards chronic pain patients
3. Pain management behaviours

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Pain, Chronic; Education
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Pain neuroscience education; Other: Red Flag Education

Detailed Description

In 2011 Briggs et al described pain education at undergraduate level for healthcare professionals as 'woefully inadequate'. Pain Neurophysiology Education (PNE) can improve undergraduates' pain understanding/management, however previous RCTs used single discipline groups and immediate follow-up. Investigation of the effectiveness of this education on students across the multi-professional team with medium-to-long-term follow-up will provide important new information on the generalisability of existing data and whether or not any changes in pain understanding/management are maintained over time.

This study aims to contribute to the development of neuromusculoskeletal chiropractic education by identifying whether or not this education, which aims to up skill healthcare professionals of the future, is effective and can change their behaviours in practice to enhance patient care in chronic pain management. PNE has been shown to be useful in patient care in conjunction with other treatment methods. If this intervention is successful in altering pain attitudes and knowledge in keeping with modern science then students may feel more confident and able to manage pain post qualification. The findings of this study will support or refute the addition of PNE into healthcare professional undergraduate programmes

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 60
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United Kingdom
  • Abingdon, United Kingdom
    • McTimoney College of Chiropractic
  • Bournemouth, United Kingdom
    • The AECC University College
  • London, United Kingdom
    • London Southbank University
  • Pontypridd, United Kingdom
    • The Welsh institute of Chiropractic - University of South Wales

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Current Chiropractic students enrolled at either: Teesside University; The Welsh institute of Chiropractic - University of South Wales; The AECC University College; McTimoney College of Chiropractic; London Southbank University
• Willing to consent to attending two educational sessions followed by completing questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

• Chiropractic students not actively enrolled at either: Teesside University; The Welsh institute of Chiropractic - University of South Wales; The AECC University College; McTimoney College of Chiropractic; London Southbank University
• Participants will be excluded if they have previously received in depth education on red flags and or pain neurophysiology.
• Students not willing to consent to attending two educational sessions followed by the completion of questionnaires

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Double

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pain neuroscience education; Pain neuroscience education group. One-off, 70 minute duration session delivered by Dr Cormac Ryan.	Other: Pain neuroscience education; Pain neuroscience education lecture
Active Comparator: Red flag education; Red flags education group. One-off 70 minute duration session delivered by Dr Cormac Ryan.	Other: Red Flag Education; Red Flag education lecture

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
The 12-item Revised Pain Neurophysiology Quiz (change assessed)	This is a validated tool for assessing knowledge of pain physiology. Measures knowledge of pain physiology using a 12 point validated questionnaire. Low score is poor sign. Scores range from 0-12.	Immediate and 6-month follow-up
The 10-item Red Flags knowledge questionnaire (change assessed)	This is a questionnaire containing 10 yes/no questions to assess participants knowledge of red flags. Low score is a poor sign. Scores range from 0-10.	Immediate and 6-month follow-up
The 13-item Health Care Providers' Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale (HC-PAIRS) (change assessed)	this a validated measure of health care professionals attitudes towards the ability of patients with pain to function despite their pain. The Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale assesses attitudes and beliefs towards pain using a 13 item validated questionnaire. High score is a worse outcome. Scores range from 13-91.	Immediate and 6-month follow-up
Case vignette (change assessed)	Measures clinical practise behaviours in pain management. A validated proxy measure of clinical behaviour, MCQ weighted as appropriate or inappropriate according to current national clinical guidelines. A low score is considered good, and scores range from 4 to 20.	Immediate and 6-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Semi-structured Interviews	Participants will be invited to take part in a semi-structured interview based in realtion to their knowledge retention and subject understanding.	6-month follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Teesside University
• Collaborators: University of South Wales; London South Bank University; AECC University College; McTimoney College of Chiropractic

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 6, 2023
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 30, 2024
• Study Completion (Actual): November 19, 2024

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 11, 2022
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 28, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Estimated): November 20, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: November 19, 2024
• Last Verified: November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Chronic Pain
• Other Study ID Numbers: TeessideUniversity22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No