Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin With an Allogenic Dermal Matrix

July 10, 2024 updated by: Hom-Lay Wang, DDS, MSD, Ph D, University of Michigan

Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin With an Allogenic Dermal Matrix, Compared to the Connective Tissue Graft: A Parallel-arm, Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-blind, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial

The study aims to test the non-inferiority of an Allogenic Dermal Matrix with Platelet-Rich Fibrin for treatment of gingival recessions in comparison to the Connective Tissue Graft.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Currently the Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) is referred to as the gold standard in terms of the grafting material for the treatment of gingival recession defects. This study test the non-inferiority of the Allogenic Dermal Matrix (ADM) with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) to that of the CTG, in terms of the amount of root coverage obtained after the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Periodontally and systemically healthy adults
  • Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20%
  • Presence of at least one 3 mm or deeper gingival recession, with at least 1.5 mm of Keratinized tissue, and 1 mm of gingival thickness) requiring surgical intervention for root coverage
  • No interproximal attachment/bone loss
  • No prior experience of root coverage procedures within the last 1 year
  • The patient must be able to perform good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for undergoing periodontal surgery
  • Teeth with more than Grade II mobility, or furcation involvement of Class III
  • Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported), or nursing women
  • Untreated/active periodontitis, or other untreated acute infections at the surgical site
  • Untreated malignancies at the surgical site
  • Persistence of uncorrected gingival trauma from traumatic toothbrushing
  • Presence of severe tooth malposition, rotation or clinically significant super-eruption
  • Self-reported current smoking more than 10 cigarettes/day or pipe or cigar smoking, or active tobacco chewing, or chronic vaping
  • Patients with any known history of blood disorders or complications such as abnormal concentration of thrombin and factor XIII in plasma, or hemophilia
  • Patients with significant co-morbidities, such as obesity, uncontrolled diabetes, immunosuppression, severe endocrine-induced bone diseases, signs of malnourishment, those receiving immunosuppressive therapy, poor tissue oxygenation or perfusion, and pre- or post-operative radiation
  • Patients with known sensitivity to Polysorbate 20, Cefoxitin, Lincomycin, polymyxin B, Vancomycin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Connective Tissue Graft
A connective tissue graft from the patient's palate will be used
Describes the flap design for both treatment arms
Experimental: Allogenic Dermal Matrix with Platelet-Rich Fibrin
An allogenic dermal matrix with the patient's platelet-rich fibrin will be used
Describes the flap design for both treatment arms

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean root coverage (mRC)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Measured as a percentage of the total baseline recession defect that coverage was obtained at.
Assessed at 6 months
Complete root coverage (CRC)
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Measured as a percentage of total treated sites, that obtained a full coverage of the recession defect
Assessed at 6 months
Keratinized tissue (KT) gain
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Measured in mm
Assessed at 6 months
Gingival thickness (GT) gain
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Measured in mm
Assessed at 6 months
Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs)
Time Frame: Measured from the day of the procedure up to a maximum of 1 month
In terms of pain/discomfort at the palatal donor site or patient's arm. Measured using a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest).
Measured from the day of the procedure up to a maximum of 1 month
Duration of surgical procedure
Time Frame: During surgery
Including the length of surgical procedure, drawing of blood, and preparation of PRF, harvesting of the autogenous CTG. Measured in minutes.
During surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Professionally evaluated esthetic score
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 months
Assessed using the Root coverage Esthetic Score (RES) system (from 0 lowest, to 10 highest)
Assessed at 6 months
Soft tissue volume changes over time
Time Frame: Changes of from baseline (prior to treatment) compared with 3 and 6 months
Assessed using 3D scanner imaging in the units of mm
Changes of from baseline (prior to treatment) compared with 3 and 6 months
Soft tissue volume changes over time
Time Frame: Measured throughout the study to assess changes from immediate post-op (right after the completion of surgical appointment) until the final recall at 6 months
Assessed using dental ultrasonography in the units of mm
Measured throughout the study to assess changes from immediate post-op (right after the completion of surgical appointment) until the final recall at 6 months
Soft tissue blood flow changes over time
Time Frame: Measured throughout the study to assess changes from immediate post-op (right after the completion of surgical appointment) until the final recall at 6 months
Assessed and quantified using dental ultrasonography
Measured throughout the study to assess changes from immediate post-op (right after the completion of surgical appointment) until the final recall at 6 months
Patient-reported esthetics
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and at 6 months, and compared between these time points to provide subjective esthetic results
Based on a visual analogue scale (VAS), measured as numbers from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest).
Measured at baseline and at 6 months, and compared between these time points to provide subjective esthetic results
Patient-reported satisfaction
Time Frame: Measured at 6 months to provide the satisfaction score in VAS scale
Based on a visual analogue scale (VAS), measured as numbers from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest).
Measured at 6 months to provide the satisfaction score in VAS scale
Patient-reported post-operative pain as measured with a mobile application
Time Frame: From the day of the procedure until 1 month after the surgical time point
Measured using a mobile application at the recession grafted site, the donor site on the palate, and the donor site for the venopuncture.
From the day of the procedure until 1 month after the surgical time point

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hom-Lay Wang, DDS MSD PhD, University of Michigan
  • Principal Investigator: Shayan Barootchi, DMD, MS, University of Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 29, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

March 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe