Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Expired Air in Healthy Volunteers: Comparison of Three Mass Spectrometry Techniques for the Characterization of Volatolome in Clinical Studies (VOC-COMPARE)

May 22, 2025 updated by: Hopital Foch
A major obstacle in precision medicine is the unavailability of biomarkers that are easy to access, non-invasive, measurable with high-performance techniques, fast, easy to use, reproducible, inexpensive and easily deployable on a large scale. The analysis of exhaled air (volatolomics) is an "omics" approach devoted to the analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) eliminated by the pulmonary route with real-time detection, at the patient's bedside. The reference technology for the analysis of VOCs is mass spectrometry (MS). Several types of mass spectrometers can be used, and, in the absence of a consensual and standardized method, have practical methods for carrying out different analyzes which also lead to the generation of specific signals whose nature, complexity and exhaustiveness of information generated are heterogeneous. The clinical studies carried out to date use one of the analytical techniques available, without the choice necessarily being guided by objective factors. The objective of this study is to fill this gap and compare the information obtained by three mass spectrometry techniques available to our team (proton transfer reaction - mass spectrometry (PTR-MS), Soft Ionization by Chemical Reaction in Transfer (SICRIT) , two-dimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GCxGC-MS)) for volatolome analysis. The comparative analysis of the different signals will make it possible to determine the interests and limits of each technique and thus to direct preferentially towards one, the other, or combinations of them for the realization of future clinical studies. One of the main challenges also consists in establishing the concordance of the signals generated by the different technological approaches, some employing prior chromatographic separation, others not, and some employing soft ionization methods while those of others are on the contrary hard. Thus, the availability of datasets obtained on the same population with these complementary approaches will allow significant progress for the identification of the COVs of interest in clinical studies, beyond the simple comparison of the analytical performances of the different methods.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Precision medicine, or personalized medicine or individualized medicine, represents an important source of hope for alleviating the social and economic burden of severe pathologies. There is no commonly accepted definition of the notion of "personalized medicine". However, according to the European Council, personalized medicine is a medical model that relies on the characterization of people's phenotypes and genotypes (e.g. through molecular profiling, medical imaging, lifestyle information) to offer the right therapeutic strategy to the right person at the right time and/or to establish the existence of a predisposition to a disease and/or to ensure targeted and timely prevention. Personalized medicine is linked to the broader notion of "patient-centred care", which takes into account the general need for health systems to better meet the needs of patients. Advances in research have made it possible to develop "omic" signatures of therapeutic responses to certain cancers or rare diseases. However, if a few omic or cellular biomarkers have been developed, they remain today insufficient and too complex to foresee their generalization for the individualized treatment of patients. Thus, today there is significant potential for the development of precision medicine for severe pathologies. A major obstacle in precision medicine is the unavailability of biomarkers that are easy to access, non-invasive, measurable with high-performance techniques, fast, easy to use, reproducible, inexpensive and easily deployable on a large scale.

The analysis of exhaled air (volatolomics) is derived from the latest "omics" technology, metabolomics, devoted to the analysis of small molecules in the body, and allows real-time detection, sick bed, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) eliminated through the lungs. Thousands of VOCs have been identified in exhaled air following infectious, inflammatory or pathological events with examples in the field of infectious diseases for the diagnosis of tuberculosis, invasive fungal infections, bacterial colonization of the airways or ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care patients . For viral infections, animal models of influenza infections and clinical studies in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease also suggest the benefit of VOC analysis . In this infectious context, the "respiratory fingerprint" detected reflects a mixture of metabolites of microbial origin, direct biomarkers of the presence of pathogenic agents, and metabolites generated by the host in response to the infection. Thus, the analysis of exhaled air, the main advantages of which are totally non-invasive sampling and the instantaneous analysis allowed by certain technologies (result in a few minutes) could be used for diagnosis, large-scale screening, surveillance of infections and prediction of response to treatment. The technological challenges for its realization are linked to the great chemical diversity of the VOCs to be studied and the particularly low abundance of many of them.

The reference technology for the analysis of VOCs is mass spectrometry (MS), which uses instruments consisting of - an ionization source whose function is to ionize the VOCs contained in exhaled air, - an analyzer which sorts the ions formed according to their mass to charge ratio (m/z) and - a detector which allows the quantitative analysis of the m/z signals of a sample . Several types of mass spectrometers can be used, and, in the absence of a consensual and standardized method, have practical methods for carrying out different analyzes which also lead to the generation of signals specific to each of them, the nature, the complexity and the completeness of the information contained being heterogeneous. Each type of instrument has advantages and disadvantages in terms of ease of sampling, speed of analysis, completeness of information and technical and analytical constraints for carrying out the analyses. For example, some instruments such as proton transfer reaction mass spectrometers (PTR-MS) or those using soft ionization by chemical transfer reaction (SICRIT) are relevant for perform measurements online and in real time, without storing a sample of exhaled air but vary by their mode of ionization and the resolution of the associated detectors. However, their level of information generated does not generally allow VOCs to be identified (soft ionization, absence of chromatographic separation, etc.). Indeed, once a signature of VOCs (characterized by their m/z) is discovered, their formal chemical identification is then the critical and obligatory step to improve knowledge on the physiology and regulatory processes of VOCs as well as to set up and clinically validate specific quantitative measurement methods based on portable technologies (sensors, etc.). Two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GCxGC-MS) is the most advanced technology at present for this purpose, combining two chromatographic columns with complementary stationary phases and ionization of VOCs by electron impact before MS detection. Compounds coeluting in conventional gas chromatography can be separated by GCxGC, and several teams have published proof-of-concept studies using GCxGC-MS for breath biomarker discovery for lung cancer diagnosis , tuberculosis or severe asthma phenotyping . One of the main challenges consists in establishing the concordance of the signals generated by the different technological approaches, some employing a preliminary chromatographic separation, others not, and some employing soft ionization methods whereas those of the others are on the contrary hard. Thus, the availability of datasets obtained on the same population with these complementary technological approaches will allow significant progress for the identification of the COVs of interest in clinical studies, beyond the simple comparison of the analytical performances of the different methods.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Grassin delyle

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy volunteer
  • At least 18 years old
  • Perfect command of the French language
  • Signature of an informed consent form
  • Affiliated to a health insurance plan

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women
  • People with known pathology(ies)
  • Active smoking
  • Deprived of liberty or under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group of healthy volunteers
This research will take place at the hospital and at the UFR Simone Veil-Santé with single sessions on the same day of approximately 10 minutes and 1 hour respectively. A list of healthy volunteers has already been established at the faculty. A provisional schedule for passing the various examinations provided for in the protocol is also scheduled. The experiments conducted at the UFR Simone Veil - Santé will take place within the Department of Health Biotechnology. This Department already has all the resources necessary for the successful completion of the study, in particular within the mass spectrometry platform which has the instruments (high resolution mass spectrometer Q-Exactive) and human resources (2 analytical science engineers, 1 data science engineer + technical staff and interns) required.

Collection of expired air as follows:

  • For online mass spectrometry techniques (PTR-MS and SICRIT)
  • For offline mass spectrometry (GCxGC-MS)

Performing volatolome analyses:

  • By PTR-TOF-MS (Ionicon) and SICRIT-HRMS (SICRIT module (Plasmion) coupled to a Q-exactive instrument (Thermofisher)) for online analyzes
  • By two-dimensional gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (Pegasus BT-4D, Leco) for the desorption tubes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To compare informations obtained by three different spectrometry techniques
Time Frame: one day
Compare the information obtained by three mass spectrometry techniques (PTR-MS, SICRIT, GCxGC-MS) for the analysis of volatolome during clinical studies
one day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1- Compare sampling techniques
Time Frame: one day
Compare the information obtained by three mass spectrometry techniques (PTR-MS, SICRIT, GCxGC-MS) for the analysis of volatolome during clinical studies
one day
2-Compare the profile of VOCs
Time Frame: one day
Compare the profile of VOCs of differents patients
one day
Determine the average time needed to perform each type of sample and associated analyzes
Time Frame: one day
Determine the average time needed to perform each type of sample and associated analyzes
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 8, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe