Diagnostic Evaluation of Dementia with Lewy Bodies Using a Multimodal Approach (EEG-EDELY)

March 24, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Diagnostic Evaluation of Dementia with Lewy Bodies Using a Multimodal Approach: EEG, Cognitive, Biological and MRI Biomarkers

Dementia with Lewy body disease (DLB) is the second leading cause of degenerative cognitive disorder after Alzheimer's disease (AD). Its variable clinical expression makes diagnosis difficult. To date, there is no validated DLB diagnostic biomarker, despite several biomarkers in development (EEG, MRI, biology).

Studies have shown that an improvement in diagnostic performance could be obtained by combining different modalities biomarkers using machine learning.

The aim of this research is to identify the best combination of multimodal biomarkers for the diagnosis of DLB (EEG, MRI, biology, cognitive scores), using a machine learning approach applied to a clinical cohort.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Study population: Observational prospective cohort study including over 24 months at the GHU AP-HP. Nord Lariboisière, Cognitive Neurology Center : 50 probable DLB patients, 50 AD patients, and 30 control subjects with subjective cognitive impairment but without any element in favor of neurodegenerative disorders. Total clinical dataset n= 130.

Act :

  • 32-electrode EEG (resting state, passive auditory and active visual task).
  • 4 dry electrode EEG cap simultaneously with the 32-electrode EEG

Expected results: Improved DLB diagnosis performance using a combination of multimodal biomarkers (EEG, cognitive scores, plasma, brain MRI).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

130

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Recruiting
        • Centre de neurologie Cognitive
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Observational prospective cohort study included at the GHU AP-HP. Nord Lariboisière, Cognitive Neurology Center : 50 probable DLB patients, 50 AD patients, and 30 control subjects with subjective cognitive impairment but without any element in favor of neurodegenerative disorders

Description

Inclusion Criteria for DLB ant AD patients:

  • Neuropsychological assessment possible (good level in French language, absence of visual/auditory deficit limiting the cognitive assessment)
  • Dementia with Lewy bodies according to the revised criteria of Mc Keith 2017 or probable AD defined according to McKhann 2011 criteria including CSF biomarkers (an abnormal level of beta-amyloid 1-42 protein [Ab42] or a pathological Ab42/Ab40 ratio and an abnormal level of phosphorylated tau [p-tau])

Inclusion Criteria for control patients:

  • Neuropsychological assessment possible (good level in French language, absence of visual/auditory deficit limiting the cognitive assessment)
  • MMSE (Mini-mental State Examination) greater than or equal to 28, normal MemScreen test results, normal brain MRI and normal neurological examination

Exclusion Criteria (for all) :

  • Contraindication to MRI
  • Other neurological or psychiatric or toxic/iatrogenic disorders that may account for the cognitive impairment or for EEG abnormalities
  • Any unstable medical pathology and/or that may account for the cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
DLB patients
Dementia with Lewy bodies according to the revised criteria of Mc Keith 2017
32-electrode EEG (resting state, passive auditory and active visual task) + simultaneous recording with a 4 dry electrode EEG cap
AD patients
Alzheimer's disease according to McKhann et al., 2011 criteria including CSF biomarkers (an abnormal level of beta-amyloid 1-42 protein [Ab42] or a pathological Ab42/Ab40 ratio and an abnormal level of phosphorylated tau [p-tau])
32-electrode EEG (resting state, passive auditory and active visual task) + simultaneous recording with a 4 dry electrode EEG cap
Control
Subjective cognitive complaint, with a normal brain MRI and neurological examination, without any elements in favor of a neurodegenerative disease
32-electrode EEG (resting state, passive auditory and active visual task) + simultaneous recording with a 4 dry electrode EEG cap

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance of a composite multimodal score
Time Frame: 24 month
Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) of a composite multimodal score combining quantitative EEG metrics, plasma biomarkers, MRI volumetric markers and cognitive scores, to differentiate groups of patients (AD, DLB) and control subjects.
24 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison between groups of patients and controls of a composite EEG score combining several quantitative EEG parameters.
Time Frame: 24 month
24 month
Correlation between EEG parameters, biological biomarkers, MRI volumetric markers and cognitive scores assessed in the three groups (DLB, AD, controls)
Time Frame: 24 month
24 month
Reproducibility of 32-electrode EEG results with the 4 dry electrodes EEG cap
Time Frame: 24 month
24 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 11, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe