Zanzibar Arts for Children's Eyesight Pilot Trial (ZANZI-ACEII)

December 10, 2024 updated by: Ving Fai Chan, Queen's University, Belfast

Utilizing Traditional and Modern Music Performance in Eye Health Education to Improve Child Eye Health Service Uptake in Zanzibar

In Zanzibar, around 22,000 children (4% of those aged 6 to 12) need treatment for eye issues like conjunctivitis or require glasses. A 2017 study found that 42% of rural children needing glasses didn't have them. Many locals distrust Western medicine and prefer traditional remedies, rejecting public health efforts such as posters and brochures.

Globally, eye health promotion has been underfunded and overlooked. Research suggests community-designed interventions and behavior change studies are needed to promote sustainable eye health practices. Arts-based interventions using traditional storytelling and performances have been effective in Africa, improving health outcomes in areas like food hygiene and mental health. Health campaigns in schools might be less effective since parents make health decisions for their children.

This study aims to see how well using both traditional and modern music performances in an eye health education program can break down cultural barriers and increase children's use of eye health services in schools and communities. The investigators want to answer three main questions:

  1. How effective is a 6-month music-based eye health education program in schools and communities at improving eye health knowledge and service use among parents and children?
  2. What factors influenced the success of the 6-month music-based eye health education program?
  3. What are the costs and benefits of this 6-month program in increasing eye health service use among children in schools and communities?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Problem: Zanzibar has about 22,000 children (4% of 6-to-12-year-old children) needing conjunctivitis treatment or spectacle correction (Ministry of Health, unpublished report). A 2017-case study showed that about 42% of children in rural Zanzibar communities who needed a pair of glasses did not have them.(1) Local stakeholders engagement revealed that underlying suspicions of Western medicine and public health initiatives led people to continue using traditional, less effective healing methods. Although health posters and brochures have successfully increased service uptake in other contexts,(2) our engagement with stakeholders revealed rejection of such initiatives among the Zanzibari community, such as when the posters were removed or vandalized.

Worldwide, eye health promotion has received limited attention and funding.(2) A Cochrane review(3) and The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health(4) suggested that behavior change and co-design studies are needed to provide evidence on promoting sustainable behavior changes among the community and children with eye problems. Health-focused arts-based interventions have been shown to catalyze behavioral changes in Africa because they are built on traditional oral and performance methods.(5) A review(6) has shown that traditional music incorporated into health promotion campaigns to improve food hygiene, perinatal mental health and Ebola in Gambia yielded highly positive results. Less effective may be health promotion strategies implemented in school settings only because parents are the ultimate decision-makers of health choices for their children.

Research questions: The study aims to explore "the effectiveness of utilizing traditional and modern music performances in an eye health education strategy implemented in school and community settings to reduce socio-cultural barriers and subsequently increase child eye health service uptake". The specific research questions are:

  1. How effective is a 6-month arts-based eye health education strategy implemented in school and community settings to improve parents' and children's eye health literacy and eye service uptake?
  2. Which factors influenced the uptake of the 6-month arts-based eye health education strategy?
  3. What are the cost and benefits of a 6-month arts-based eye health education strategy on improving eye health service uptake among children in school and community settings?

A: Assess the effectiveness of a 6-month arts-based eye health education program implemented in school and then community settings to improve parents' and children's eye health literacy and eye service uptake

  1. Trained teachers will screen approximately 8000 children in eight intervention schools (with art-based eye health education program) and eight control schools (without any health education program) and refer approximately 400 children with vision <6/12 or/and refractive error (RE) and obvious eye diseases for free ocular management at the local eye clinics (current practice). Teachers in enrolled schools will maintain an eye health register to record the names of children who failed vision screening tests and are then referred for treatment, the reasons for referral, and follow up on which children attended an eye examination at the referral clinics. With an estimated prevalence of children with refractive error and obvious eye diseases of 5%, the investigators will have a sufficient sample size for analysis in this pilot trial.
  2. Before the intervention, the investigators will administer a baseline demographic profile survey to all 400 children with refractive error and obvious eye diseases and their parents, 400 children with normal vision and their parents, followed by a baseline knowledge and attitude survey. Children referred for further ocular management will be followed up at Month 3 to determine the proportion of them who have gone for an eye examination at the hospital (baseline uptake rate). The enrolment will begin in Month 4. Subsequently, the eye health education will be broadcasted at intervention schools once during morning assembly, once during recess and once before school on Monday and Friday starting at Month 4. At Month 10, the endline 1 data (children's knowledge and attitude survey, eye health register checks) will be collected to determine follow-up scores and rates.
  3. At Month 11, a popular local radio station will broadcast eye health education in the musical form three times a day. At Month 14, the second follow-up data (parents' knowledge and attitude survey, eye health register checks) will be collected to determine endline 2 follow-up scores/rates.
  4. The primary outcomes are the change in the proportion of children accessing eye health services and the change in children's and parents' knowledge and attitude scores from baseline and endline 1 and endline 2. The secondary outcomes are the proportion and causes of children failing eye health screening, the proportion of children wearing spectacles during an unannounced visit and the children's self-reported compliance to eye medication treatment.

B: Explore in what ways social, cultural and artistic factors influenced the uptake of the arts-based eye health education strategy

  1. Stakeholders involved in the music pieces' co-creation process will be invited to identify and reflect on the achievements, gaps, and barriers between what was intended by them and what was received by the intended audience. Stakeholders include Ministries' representatives, community and religious leaders, artist groups, parents, children, teachers and traditional healers. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted 6 months after the program implementation.
  2. A series of small group discussions and individual interviews will be held with various target audiences of the intervention to ascertain responses to the intervention by those not involved in its design. These will include children, their guardians, teachers, health care practitioners, traditional healers, radio broadcasters and cultural workers from the context to determine 'audience reception'.
  3. Thematic analysis will be conducted to ascertain (i) the efficacy of the makers' intentionality for the intervention concerning the reception of the pieces in context ('fitness-for-purpose'); (ii) the conceptual impact of the content of the music pieces in terms of the socio-cultural barriers addressed and myths dispelled, and how this intervention has contributed to new and/or existing counter-narratives of eye health; (iii) the reception of the music form of the pieces, including associated with past (heritage), current and aspirational (contemporary) genres and registers, and in what ways such artistic and cultural associations have contributed to the intervention's efficacy.

C: Determine the cost and benefits of a short-term arts-based eye health education strategy on improving eye health service uptake among children to inform upscale investment decisions

  1. The investigators will develop a costing tool to (i) identify the main implementing costs, including the time and skills to develop the radio broadcast; (ii) calculate the costs of the intervention's roll-out to schools and the wider community; (iii) determine the costs that the intervention may save in the longer term, such as from absenteeism or treatment made unnecessary because of early treatment.
  2. The pilot will enable us to cost the intervention and how affordable it is. By looking at the uptake of the intervention in schools and the community, the investigators can compare the costs and benefits of the strategies. Value is defined as cost relative to benefits, whereas budget impact is about costs only. Both are widely used for healthcare investment decisions in LMIC. This will enable policymakers to assess how affordable the intervention is. Understanding what are given up when a new intervention is funded (what else could have done with these resources) and the return on investment is crucial to helping policymakers decide whether the program is worth the investment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1295

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zanzibar, Tanzania
        • Ministry of Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary and secondary schools with student school-going rates of approximately 75%
  • schools with similar number of boys and girls
  • schools within 5km of the nearest eye centres.
  • school children who have either an obvious eye disease tested using a pen torch test and/or a presenting distance visual acuity ≤6/12 in either eye, and their parents.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • primary and secondary schools with student school-going rates of less than 75%
  • schools with imbalance number of boys and girls
  • schools above 5km of the nearest eye centres.
  • school children who do not have either an obvious eye disease tested using a pen torch test and/or a presenting distance visual acuity ≤6/12 in either eye, and their parents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Musical pieces developed by the Ministry of Education and Vocational Training will be played at intervention schools using compact discs. These will be broadcast once during morning assembly, once during recess, and once before school ends on Mondays and Fridays for 3 months. After this period, a popular local radio station will broadcast the music pieces three times a day during peak hours.
An arts-based eye health intervention featuring traditional and contemporary music pieces will be broadcasted at both school and community levels.
Active Comparator: Comparator
A popular local radio station will broadcast the music pieces three times a day during peak hours, coinciding with the times when the intervention group is receiving the same program (community broadcast).
An arts-based eye health intervention featuring traditional and contemporary music pieces will be broadcasted at community levels.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of children accessing eye health services
Time Frame: Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Proportion of children who have gone for eye treatment at the referral sites over those who failed eye health screening and referred to the referral site; measured in percentage, the higher the percentage the better the referral rate
Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Children spectacle compliance
Time Frame: Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Possession of glasses at school during an unannounced examination will be measured as either yes or no. A higher proportion of "yes" responses indicates better compliance.
Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Children eye drops usage compliance
Time Frame: Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Self-reported completion of eye drop treatment will be measured as either yes or no. A higher proportion of "yes" responses indicates better compliance.
Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Cost-benefit analysis
Time Frame: Through study completion, 6 months after the intervention is implemented.
Costs will be measured by the program expenses, while benefits will be assessed by the proportion of children who voluntarily seek eye treatment at referral sites compared to those who failed the eye health screening and were referred. A higher proportion of treated children per US dollar spent indicates a higher cost-benefit ratio.
Through study completion, 6 months after the intervention is implemented.
Parents knowledge and attitude
Time Frame: Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
A 27-item questionnaire will be used for measurement. Each question requires a yes or no response. A higher number of "yes" answers indicates better knowledge and attitude.
Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Children's knowledge and attitude
Time Frame: Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
A 27-item questionnaire will be used for measurement. Each question requires a yes or no response. A higher number of "yes" answers indicates better knowledge and attitude.
Three months and six months after the intervention is implemented
Cost effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: Through study completion, 6 months after the intervention is implemented.
Cost will be measured by the program expenses, while effectiveness will be assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5Q-Y questionnaire). A higher score per US dollar indicates greater cost-effectiveness.
Through study completion, 6 months after the intervention is implemented.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ving Fai Chan, PhD, Queen's University, Belfast

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MHLS 23_32

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe