- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06598189
Ear-Seizure Detection (EarSD) Study (EarSD001)
Real-time Seizure Detection, Classification, and Prediction Using a Low-Cost Low-Burden Ear-worn System
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Stephanie Stephens
- Phone Number: 508-856-3939
- Email: Stephanie.Stephens1@umassmed.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Charles Hill
- Email: Charles.hill6@umassmed.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
- Recruiting
- Ummmc-Memorial Campus
-
Contact:
- Charles Hill, BS
- Phone Number: (508) 856 4667
- Email: charles.hill6@umassmed.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Felicia Chu, MD
-
Contact:
- Stephanie Stephens, BS
- Phone Number: (508) 856-3939
- Email: stephanie.stephens1@umassmed.edu
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01655
- Recruiting
- Ummmc-University Campus
-
Contact:
- Charles Hill, BS
- Phone Number: (508) 856 4667
- Email: charles.hill6@umassmed.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Felicia Chu, MD
-
Contact:
- Stephanie Stephens, BS
- Phone Number: 508) 856-3939
- Email: stephanie.stephens1@umassmed.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Patients admitted to UMass Memorial Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) for long term video-EEG monitoring as part of standard care of both focal and generalized epilepsy.
- Willing to wear the wearable device.
- Ability to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects wearing other ear devices such as hearing aids.
- Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent.
- Irritation of the skin where the device is to be placed.
- Patients with intracranial electrodes placement.
- Prisoners
- Cognitive impaired individuals
- Pregnant Women
- Children (Age 0-17)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ear-Worn Group
All consented patients admitted to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) who are on continuous EEG (cEEG) will wear the ear-worn seizure detection device (EarSD) and there will be no randomization. The Ear-SD Device will be simultaneously worn by EMU patients on continuous video 21 electrode EEG (International 10-20 system) and single channel electrocardiogram (ECG). Daily skin assessment will be conducted and electrodes will be replaced as needed. At the end of the study, a self-reported short qualitative survey will be conducted to assess the overall experience of the enrolled subjects. The EarSD device and electrodes will be removed at the end of the study with the last skin examination. |
The Ear-SD is a purely EEG recording device Continuous Electroencephalogram (cEEG), Electromyogram (EMG), Electrooculogram (EOG), Photoplethysmogram (PPG), Electrodermoactivity (EDA), and Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU).
The Ear-SD device rests on the ears and connects to the scalp by two sticker electrodes.
Standard 21-channel scalp-continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) with video recording and electrocardiogram (ECG)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Seizure Recording Criteria 1
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
Recordings of Bioelectrical signal of subjects with the wearable device and simultaneous continuous EEG data is collected for the duration of hospitalization of participants.
Outcome measures reported include number of seizure events per participant.
|
Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
|
Seizure Recording Criteria 2
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
Recordings of Bioelectrical signal of subjects with the wearable device and simultaneous continuous EEG data is collected for the duration of hospitalization of participants.
Outcome measures reported include average duration of each seizure in minutes and seconds and total recording time in hours aggregated to arrive at one reported value seizure classification.
|
Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
|
Seizure Recording Criteria 3
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
Recordings of Bioelectrical signal of subjects with the wearable device and simultaneous continuous EEG data is collected for the duration of hospitalization of participants.
Outcome measures reported include reported value seizure classification.
Seizure classification includes Unclassified (UC), Focal Onset Aware (FOA), Focal Onset Impaired (FOIA), Focal to Bilateral Tonic-Clonic (FBTC).
|
Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
|
Data Interpretation
Time Frame: up to 2 years
|
EarSD extracted EEG signals from the log file plotted alongside EDF files from cEEG are measured and compared to detect seizure onset and offset times for data interpretation.
Two-minute segments of cEEG European Data Format (EDF) consisting of non-seizure signals from periods before and after the seizures, and non-seizure signals from periods of daily activities like talking, eating, and walking are involved in the comparison to detect seizure onset and offset times.
Prediction measurement of Seizure Sensitivity (SS) and False Positivity Rate per hour (FPR/h) are measured from the recorded data signals.
Seizure Sensitivity (SS) is the ratio between the (number of predicted seizures)/(total number of seizures) = (number of true alarms)/(total number of seizures).
FPR/h is the number of alarms that do not correspond to seizures raised in one hour.
FPR/h = ((Number of false alarms/Interictal Duration) - (Number of False Alarms × Refractory period)).
|
up to 2 years
|
|
Seizure Accuracy/Prediction
Time Frame: up to 5 years
|
EarSD recordings from each electrode are separated and filtered to eliminate noise and artifact and results in 12 output signals (6 signals/ear) for comparison against cEEG EDF files for accuracy and precision.
Mean, standard and average deviation, skewness, kurtosis, lowest and highest value, and the root mean square amplitude are measured from the dataset and are normalized between 0 and 1 then passed into the seizure detection and prediction Machine Learning (ML) model.
ML model consisting of algorithms using deep neural networks (DNN), recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory networks (LSTM), classifies whether the signals are a seizure signal vs non-seizure signal, the focal type (left side/right side) and predicts the accuracy of seizures a minute ahead with the goal of achieving 96 percent or better accuracy and reducing the number of false positives.
|
up to 5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Qualitative Satisfaction Survey
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
At the end of the study, patients' experience and perception of the EarSD device are collected using a paper-based 7-question survey measured on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree.
A maximum total point score of 35 represents a better reported satisfactory score from participants and having a good experience with the device and its comfortability for daily activities.
The survey is a self-administered report, and participants will be asked about the comfortability and perceived utility of the device.
|
Through study completion, an average of 7 Days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Felicia Chu, MD, UMass Neurology Department
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Beniczky S, Conradsen I, Wolf P. Detection of convulsive seizures using surface electromyography. Epilepsia. 2018 Jun;59 Suppl 1:23-29. doi: 10.1111/epi.14048.
- Vandecasteele K, De Cooman T, Chatzichristos C, Cleeren E, Swinnen L, Macea Ortiz J, Van Huffel S, Dumpelmann M, Schulze-Bonhage A, De Vos M, Van Paesschen W, Hunyadi B. The power of ECG in multimodal patient-specific seizure monitoring: Added value to an EEG-based detector using limited channels. Epilepsia. 2021 Oct;62(10):2333-2343. doi: 10.1111/epi.16990. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
- Barranco R, Caputo F, Molinelli A, Ventura F. Review on post-mortem diagnosis in suspected SUDEP: Currently still a difficult task for Forensic Pathologists. J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Feb;70:101920. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101920. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
- Blachut B, Hoppe C, Surges R, Elger C, Helmstaedter C. Subjective seizure counts by epilepsy clinical drug trial participants are not reliable. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Feb;67:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.10.036. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
- Prior PF, Virden RS, Maynard DE. An EEG device for monitoring seizure discharges. Epilepsia. 1973 Dec;14(4):367-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1973.tb03975.x. No abstract available.
- Manabe, H., Fukumoto, M., & Yagi, T. (2015a). Conductive rubber electrodes for earphone-based eye gesture input interface. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 19(1), 143-154. doi:10.1007/s00779-014-0818-8
- A. H. Shoeb and J. Guttag, "Application of Machine Learning To Epileptic Seizure Detection," in 2010 International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Jun. 2010. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Application-of-Machine-Learning-ToEpileptic-Shoeb-Guttag/57e4afe9ca74414fa02f2e0a929b64dc9a03334d.
- Zandi AS, Javidan M, Dumont GA, Tafreshi R. Automated real-time epileptic seizure detection in scalp EEG recordings using an algorithm based on wavelet packet transform. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010 Jul;57(7):1639-51. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2010.2046417.
- Doyle OM, Temko A, Marnane W, Lightbody G, Boylan GB. Heart rate based automatic seizure detection in the newborn. Med Eng Phys. 2010 Oct;32(8):829-39. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.05.010. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
- Jansen K, Varon C, Van Huffel S, Lagae L. Peri-ictal ECG changes in childhood epilepsy: implications for detection systems. Epilepsy Behav. 2013 Oct;29(1):72-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.06.030. Epub 2013 Aug 10.
- C. Bagavathi, S. M, S. M. Nair, and S. R, "Novel Epileptic Detection System using Portable EMG-based Assistance," in 2022 International Conference on Applied Artificial Intelligence and Computing (ICAAIC), May 2022, pp. 1762-1765. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9793109.
- Djemal A, Bouchaala D, Fakhfakh A, Kanoun O. Wearable Electromyography Classification of Epileptic Seizures: A Feasibility Study. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;10(6):703. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10060703.
- S. Ganesan, T. A. A. Victoire, and R. Ganesan, "EDA based automatic detection of epileptic seizures using wireless system," in 2011 International Conference on Electronics, Communication and Computing Technologies, Sep. 2011, pp. 47-52. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6077068.
- Poh MZ, Loddenkemper T, Reinsberger C, Swenson NC, Goyal S, Sabtala MC, Madsen JR, Picard RW. Convulsive seizure detection using a wrist-worn electrodermal activity and accelerometry biosensor. Epilepsia. 2012 May;53(5):e93-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03444.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
- Z. Liang and T. Nishimura, "Are wearable EEG devices more accurate than fitness wristbands for home sleep Tracking? Comparison of consumer sleep trackers with clinical devices," in 2017 IEEE 6th Global Conference on Consumer Electronics (GCCE), Oct. 2017, pp. 1-5. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8229188.
- ANSI/AAMI ES60601-1:2005, Medical electrical equipment-Part 1: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance. (2005). Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation.
- DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health, "Guidance Document Device: Electrocardiograph Surface Electrode Tester". (1997).
- IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety on Non-Ionizing Radiation, "IEEE Std C95.6TM-2002: IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields. (2002).
- Costa G, Teixeira C, Pinto MF. Comparison between epileptic seizure prediction and forecasting based on machine learning. Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56019-z.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Brain Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Epilepsy
- Nervous System Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Seizures
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Diagnostic Techniques, Neurological
- Electrodiagnosis
- Electroencephalography
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00001889
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.