Long-term Evaluation of Nasopharyngeal Airway in Hypotonia

December 1, 2025 updated by: Louise O'Brien, University of Michigan
This research is studying the long term use of a nasal airway device (self-supporting nasopharyngeal airway; "ssNPA") in children with hypotonic upper airway obstruction to learn about its effectiveness and tolerability as a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children with Hypotonic Upper Airway Obstruction (HUAO) that took part in the original study (HUM00189669/NCT04846400 or HUM00220966/NCT05527652 trials)
  • Willingness to continue device usage.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of OSA (apnea/hypopnea index; AHI > 10 or AHI >5 with lowest oxygen level ≤75%)
  • At least one symptom of OSA (such as frequent snoring, daytime sleepiness, or hyperactive/inattentive behaviors)
  • Previous adenotonsillectomy (unless tonsillectomy not possible)
  • Tonsil size 2+ or smaller

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants that were non-compliant with the Self-Supporting Nasopharyngeal Airway (ssNPA) device during participation in the parent study listed above
  • Any medical reason why ssNPA therapy may not be suitable
  • Active COVID 19 infections Moderate/severe tracheobronchomalacia
  • Need for anticoagulative therapy
  • Bleeding disorder
  • Restrictive thoracic disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-Supporting Nasopharyngeal Airway (ssNPA)
Participants will use the device up to 24 months.

The ssNPA device is a flexible, medical-grade silicone, nasal tube that is self-inserted into the airway through one nostril and worn during the night. It can also be used during the day. The device works by supporting collapsed airway muscles and keeping the airway open.

In addition to wearing the device, study team members will call monthly and collect certain data, and medical information and participants will be asked to have a sleep study at the 12-month visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) severity measured by the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) assessed by overnight polysomnography
Time Frame: Approximately 1 year
Device efficacy will be measured by apnea/hypopnea index.
Approximately 1 year
Long term device tolerability assessed by self-report from caregivers
Time Frame: 2 years
This is a one question (likert scale 1-10) that participants' caregivers will complete at the final assessment (higher scores indicating better device tolerability).
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Long-term impact on sleep quality will be assessed by the mean score on the parent report of sleep quality
Time Frame: 1-2 years
This will be a on a scale 1-10 (higher score is better).
1-2 years
Long-term impact on daytime sleepiness will be assessed by the mean score on the children's Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)
Time Frame: 1-2 years
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a self-administered form with eight items investigating sleep propensity in different real-life situations during the preceding months. Each item can receive 0-3 points, thus the final score ranges from 0 (best score) to 24 (worse score).
1-2 years
Long-term impact on quality of life will be assessed with the OSA-18
Time Frame: 1-2 years
This is an obstructive sleep apnea-specific quality of life tool for children and the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL), a standard health-related quality of life instrument. Scores range from 0-126 with higher scores indicting worse impact. There are several dimensions of the PedsQL: Physical Functioning, Emotional Functioning, Social Functioning and School Functioning. Each domain will be scored on a scale of 0 (never have problems) to 4 (almost always have problems) and transformed on a scale of 0-100 by reverse scoring (0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0). Psychosocial Health Summary Score is the sum of the items over the number of items answered in the Emotional, Social, and School Functioning scales. Physical Health Summary Score is the Physical Functioning Scale Score. The total quality of life score is the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all scales.
1-2 years
Family Impact Questionnaire (FIQ)
Time Frame: 1-2 years
This tool measures parent's perceptions of the child's negative impact on the family. The FIQ is a 50-item, four-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much) that asks about the impact the child has had on the family (e.g., social life, finances, marriage, and siblings) compared to the impact other children his/her age have on their families. Higher score is more significant impact.
1-2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Louise M O'Brien, PhD, MS, University Michigan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 23, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe