Effects Multimodal Mind and Body Approach for MCI

February 23, 2026 updated by: Jian Kong, Massachusetts General Hospital

Modulation Effects of a Computer-based Multimodal Mind and Body Approach for Mild Cognitive Decline

The aim of this application is to develop a computer-based multimodal mind and body approach (CMMBA) for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This product will provide a new, cost-effective and easily accessible treatment option for MCI and potentially other age-related dementia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this Phase I R41 (STTR) application is to develop a computer-based multimodal mind and body approach (cbMMBA) to improve the cognitive function for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). This application, if successful, will provide a cost-effective and easily accessible treatment option for MCI and other age-related dementia, significantly improve the prevention of MCI development, and directly benefit patients suffering from the highly prevalent disorder, particularly for those who may have limited access to in-person mind and body interventions.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. report of cognitive decline / complaint by the patient, the patient's informant, or the physician;
  2. cognitive impairment is confirmed by objective cognitive measures (Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and neuropsychological testing), where objective cognitive impairment is defined as poor performance in one or more cognitive measures suggesting deficit in one or more cognitive domains;
  3. patient has preserved independence in functional abilities (measured by informant report, completion of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) checklists);
  4. not demented;

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. has severe visual or hearing impairment;
  2. has pre-existing musculoskeletal or other conditions, which prohibit BDJ performance and / or the application of acupressure at the selected points;
  3. has suffered from a neurological disorder (e.g., severe head trauma), psychiatric disease (e.g., major depression), or any other major medical disease that could potentially compromise their cognition;
  4. has had prior experience with BDJ or acupressure or relaxation techniques in the past year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A computer-based multimodal mind and body approach (cbMMBA)
cbMMBA will include three modules: BDJ (module 1), acupressure (module 2), and relaxation techniques including deep breathing, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation
cbMMBA will include three modules: BDJ, acupressure, and relaxation techniques including deep breathing, guided imagery, and progressive muscle relaxation.
Active Comparator: a standard cognitive training
The program uses paper puzzles (Sudoku, crosswords, word-search, etc.) to engage subjects
The program uses paper puzzles (Sudoku, crosswords, word-search, etc.) to engage subjects

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention
Time Frame: Through study intervention, an average of three months
Proportion of subjects who complete all assessments from the total number of subjects started the first intervention
Through study intervention, an average of three months
Fidelity
Time Frame: Through study interventions, an average of three months
session completed of total 30 classes
Through study interventions, an average of three months
Satisfaction to Intervention
Time Frame: Through study interventions, an average of three months
average score in a 1-5 scale, 5 indicates very satisfied with the intervention
Through study interventions, an average of three months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through study interventions, an average of three months
Adverse events were assessed by participant self-report at each study visit. An adverse event was defined as any unfavorable or unintended sign, symptom, or medical occurrence temporally associated with study participation, regardless of attribution. This outcome reports the number of participants who experienced ≥1 adverse event during the study period (each participant counted once).
Through study interventions, an average of three months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The Small Business Act permits SBIR/STTR grantees to withhold data for 4 years after the end of the grant award.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe