Silicone vs Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

A Observer Blind Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial to Determine the Equivalence of a Silicone Gel With Superoxidized Water vs. a Pirfenidone Gel for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids

Justification:

Keloid scars are a major medical and cosmetic problem, especially in darker skin types that predominate in Mexico. It is estimated that hypertrophic scars affecting from 1.5 to 4.5% of the general population. However, the exact prevalence is unknown but studies show that going from 32 to 67%. And there are studies documenting that this prevalence is higher in Hispanic and black individuals and in the pediatric population.

Keloid scars can become highly symptomatic disfiguring and which affects the quality of life of patients and their self-esteem.Problem Statement:

Is silicone gel solutions superoxidation with equal or better than the gel 8% pirfenidone to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars?

Goal:

To evaluate the efficacy of a silicone gel-oxidation with solutions compared to a gel containing 8% pirfenidone.

Hypothesis:

If the silicone gel solutions superoxidation is equal or better than gel 8% pirfenidone to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars, then the reduction in the ECV and the EVA will be similar in the first group than the second.

Design:

Comparative, observer blind, experimental and prospective study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

This is a comparative, non-inferiority, experimental, prospective, longitudinal pilot study with blind evaluator, in patients with keloid or hypertrophic scars. Twenty patients per group randomly assigned to receive identical tubes of either a silicone-based gel with superoxidized water, or an 8% pirfenidone gel. Follow-up was scheduled at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks recording the location, mechanism of the scar, time of evolution, skin phototype, accompanying symptoms, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and validated scar assessment tools (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale, Vancouver Scar Scale, and the Analog Visual Scale for Keloids).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 01710
        • Hospital General Manuel Gea González

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • keloid or hypetrophic scar

Exclusion Criteria:

  • collagen diseases pregnancy previous treatment for 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Topical Silicone Gel
A gel containing silicone
topic aplication
Other Names:
  • Kelodacyn
Active Comparator: Topical Pirfenidone Gel
A gel containing pirfenidone
topic aplication
Other Names:
  • kitoscell

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dermatology Life Quality Index Score
Time Frame: 3 months
A life quality index for dermatological conditions
3 months
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale Score
Time Frame: 3 months
A validated scale (POSAS and OSAS) to assess relevant clinical characteristics of scars.
3 months
Vancouver Scar Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
A validated scar scale
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jose Contreras-Ruiz, Hospital General Dr Manuel Gea Gonzalez

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe